lasfar

lasfar — CS2 Stats

DK76561198259853771[U:1:299588043]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,471Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,032Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,410 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,410 → 1,410
+3Tracked matches · now 1,471
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,479 +8,795 10 Dec – 30 Apr · 5 days played
12,68421,479peak 21,47910 Dec30 Apr
Faceit ELO: 1,410 +0 22 Sept – 25 Sept · 2 observations
1,4101,410peak 1,41022 Sept25 Sept
21,479Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,410Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2025-11-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,410
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 121 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3——
Win rate33%——
K/D1.04——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate44.0%48.2%50.9%7.0% short
Shot accuracy9.0%13.2%13.7%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.071.090.05 short
Match win rate45.9%46.9%48.4%2.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlasfarFACEITLevel 9 · 1,410 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,410csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning59
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLWLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.9
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time538ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 10 Dec →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 5 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · nuke, 6 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2212–1055%0.00
mirageC188–1044%-0.01
infernoA169–756%0.01
ancientS1510–567%-0.01
nukeA159–660%-0.01
anubisA85–363%0.01
overpass—21–150%0.01
vertigo—22–0100%-0.00
train—20–20%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,073Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
3,654Matches
45.9%Match win rate
44.0%Headshot %
9.0%Shot accuracy
9,569MVPs
1,286Hours (in match)
3,580Bombs planted
719Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,685
AWP6,459
MP74,644
Knife1,941
SCAR-201,933
FAMAS1,773

Lifetime map wins

4,786dust2
3,857inferno
2,387nuke
1,732vertigo
1,238lake
1,142train
295cbble
105office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,218Matches
49%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
75.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27046%0.9613.7
Dust225449%0.9614.3
Ancient15648%0.9814.1
Nuke14355%0.9913.8
Inferno13049%0.9314.3
Anubis13049%0.9413.6
Vertigo7050%0.8914.1
Train3855%0.9715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
538msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
8.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9538% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient1–13-0.0517%9 Sept →
inferno13–70.0520%5 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0819%30 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.019%30 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0121%30 Aug →
ancient13–70.0322%24 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0221%22 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0121%22 Aug →
mirage13–40.0313%20 Aug →
dust222–25-0.0228%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0816%12 Aug →
inferno10–130.1120%12 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0945%5 Aug →
inferno13–110.0010%5 Aug →
inferno13–80.0218%3 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0219%1 Aug →
inferno13–90.0319%26 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0110%25 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0315%25 Jul →
nuke13–100.008%25 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0421%12 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0719%12 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.045%5 Jul →
anubis13–110.0918%5 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0512%23 May →
inferno13–5-0.0019%17 May →
dust27–13-0.0411%14 May →
mirage7–130.0123%13 May →
overpass16–190.0211%12 May →
ancient13–90.0415%12 May →
overpass13–11-0.0117%9 May →
anubis5–13-0.0219%5 May →
nuke13–70.0316%5 May →
ancient11–13-0.0112%4 May →
nuke8–130.0422%4 May →
mirage13–110.0218%1 May →
dust216–120.0225%30 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.039%30 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0216%30 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.018%25 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0133%24 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0122%24 Apr →
dust213–40.0820%24 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0125%20 Apr →
inferno11–130.0314%19 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0115%11 Apr →
inferno16–190.0121%11 Apr →
nuke13–50.0117%9 Apr →
nuke6–130.0420%6 Apr →
ancient13–110.0513%6 Apr →
mirage3–8-0.0522%4 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0520%30 Mar →
vertigo9–10.0612%30 Mar →
dust215–150.0520%30 Mar →
anubis13–60.0913%29 Mar →
inferno13–90.0216%28 Mar →
mirage2–130.0214%18 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0221%18 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0112%16 Mar →
nuke13–4-0.0129%15 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0124%15 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0313%8 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0521%3 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0513%3 Mar →
nuke13–80.0717%3 Mar →
anubis13–70.0321%1 Mar →
inferno13–60.0418%22 Feb →
inferno16–19-0.0412%31 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.015%25 Jan →
anubis13–100.0213%25 Jan →
dust213–20.0716%25 Jan →
ancient13–40.0216%25 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0316%25 Jan →
dust213–160.0132%20 Jan →
dust213–50.0419%16 Jan →
mirage5–13-0.0415%11 Jan →
mirage13–10.0623%11 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0213%8 Jan →
mirage7–130.0118%8 Jan →
mirage13–40.019%7 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.013%6 Jan →
train14–160.0111%4 Jan →
dust213–110.0713%27 Dec →
dust213–10-0.0621%20 Dec →
train7–13-0.0217%19 Dec →
dust213–40.1314%10 Dec →
mirage13–100.0316%10 Dec →
nuke16–13-0.0316%6 Dec →
mirage5–6-0.0240%5 Dec →
nuke12–12-0.0226%5 Dec →
vertigo13–7-0.079%5 Dec →
mirage12–12-0.0012%5 Dec →
nuke16–13-0.0219%4 Dec →
mirage13–110.0013%3 Dec →
dust27–13-0.0318%16 Nov →
nuke1–12-0.110%12 Nov →
dust212–16-0.049%12 Nov →
mirage13–70.0328%11 Nov →
inferno2–13-0.0525%11 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0026%11 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.