sander

sander — CS2 Stats

NO76561198257016544[U:1:296750816]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

443Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since
781Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingClutch Specialist
CSDB Leaderboard#55062 of 240785 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 7 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,779 -590 7 Feb27 Mar · 18 days played
20,67424,052peak 24,0527 Feb27 Mar
24,131Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-02-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate31.9%45.7%46.8%14.9% short
Shot accuracy18.6%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.051.06above
Match win rate40.5%45.7%46.3%5.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsanderFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning41
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42553Last 10042%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility4.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time618ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 10.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 12 Feb
30%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 16 Feb
422msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 11 Feb
13–4Biggest win · nuke, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15mirageWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD1961332%-0.01
nukeA159660%-0.00
infernoC145936%0.00
anubisC146843%-0.00
ancientC145936%-0.00
dust2B137654%-0.02
overpassC83538%0.00
cache2020%-0.07
shelter110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,840Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,126Matches
40.5%Match win rate
31.9%Headshot %
18.6%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
4,932MVPs
781Hours (in match)
1,628Bombs planted
433Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,713inferno
1,836dust2
1,617cbble
1,263train
803nuke
271safehouse
250bank
228lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

102Matches
60%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
105.8ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21050%1.1820.9
Mirage1060%1.7120.6
Inferno978%1.6820.8
Anubis580%1.4218.6
Ancient560%1.9520.8
Vertigo367%1.5325.0
Nuke367%1.0816.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
610msReaction time
16.1%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.92HE damage / grenade
4.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6665% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.0638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.007%5 Sept
anubis13–80.058%5 Sept
ancient13–11-0.048%5 Sept
nuke9–130.055%5 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0519%28 Aug
nuke13–40.0418%28 Aug
cache6–13-0.0521%28 Aug
anubis8–130.0014%28 Aug
shelter13–60.0513%2 Aug
dust21–13-0.0512%2 Aug
overpass13–50.0417%2 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0518%1 Aug
inferno13–50.0813%1 Aug
mirage16–140.0414%1 Aug
anubis7–130.019%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0113%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0722%19 Jul
ancient7–130.078%16 Jul
inferno3–13-0.028%16 Jul
anubis10–130.0213%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0325%15 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0711%15 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0315%15 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0411%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.1015%30 Apr
dust210–130.0215%27 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0515%27 Mar
nuke13–9-0.118%26 Mar
dust213–11-0.068%26 Mar
nuke9–13-0.104%26 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0923%26 Mar
ancient15–15-0.1014%23 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0821%23 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0123%20 Mar
nuke16–140.0516%19 Mar
dust213–10-0.0129%19 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0417%19 Mar
dust213–10-0.0817%25 Feb
dust26–13-0.099%18 Feb
inferno9–130.049%18 Feb
inferno7–130.0210%18 Feb
inferno13–110.0211%17 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0610%17 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0815%16 Feb
ancient5–130.008%16 Feb
nuke15–150.1116%16 Feb
anubis13–60.017%16 Feb
inferno13–110.047%16 Feb
dust27–13-0.0330%16 Feb
overpass1–130.0013%15 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0118%15 Feb
anubis8–130.058%15 Feb
overpass8–13-0.058%15 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0012%14 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0110%14 Feb
nuke13–40.0613%14 Feb
mirage8–130.0510%14 Feb
mirage5–13-0.019%13 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0613%13 Feb
mirage16–12-0.009%13 Feb
nuke16–120.0313%13 Feb
ancient7–130.0013%13 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0424%13 Feb
dust26–13-0.0415%13 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0810%13 Feb
inferno13–60.106%12 Feb
ancient13–60.0413%12 Feb
ancient13–60.146%12 Feb
mirage13–6-0.057%12 Feb
dust213–110.0215%12 Feb
mirage13–100.0316%12 Feb
anubis13–100.0711%11 Feb
overpass8–130.1011%11 Feb
mirage11–130.0612%11 Feb
dust213–80.0315%11 Feb
ancient13–4-0.058%11 Feb
nuke13–60.047%11 Feb
overpass13–11-0.033%11 Feb
ancient4–13-0.029%11 Feb
ancient13–60.078%10 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0211%10 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0210%10 Feb
nuke13–50.0110%10 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0313%10 Feb
ancient6–13-0.038%10 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0218%9 Feb
ancient6–13-0.097%9 Feb
dust210–13-0.0119%9 Feb
anubis13–80.0115%9 Feb
ancient11–130.014%9 Feb
overpass9–10.0710%9 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0216%8 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0220%8 Feb
dust213–9-0.0412%8 Feb
mirage3–13-0.045%7 Feb
anubis13–10-0.046%7 Feb
nuke16–12-0.039%7 Feb
mirage7–13-0.029%7 Feb
dust213–100.0513%7 Feb
mirage5–13-0.068%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →