george foid — CS2 Stats

76561198254718648[U:1:294452920]✓ No bans

426Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,086Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.3%47.0%48.5%5.3% short
Shot accuracy20.4%12.7%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.381.071.07above
Match win rate61.4%46.4%47.0%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgeorge foidFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning51
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59383Last 10059%Win rateWWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression4.4
Utility4.1
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.1
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time549ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–4
131Biggest win — mirage
10Longest win streak
W4Current streak
156In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 18dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2112957%0.00
infernoS2115671%0.02
anubisS1814478%-0.01
ancientA1810856%0.00
dust2C145936%0.01
nuke3030%-0.01
overpass21150%0.00
office110100%-0.04
cache1010%-0.05
boulder110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,751Lifetime kills
1.38K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
3,482Matches
61.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players
43.3%Headshot %
20.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
17,584MVPs
2,299Hours (in match)
2,164Bombs planted
1,890Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,747
AWP25,134
SSG 083,684
AUG1,830
SG 5531,797
P2501,790

Lifetime map wins

6,565dust2
3,898inferno
1,684cbble
1,666train
1,334vertigo
1,194nuke
235lake
222safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

58Matches
64%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
79.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1464%0.9818.0
Anubis1275%1.0715.7
Dust2933%1.1014.2
Mirage967%1.6019.0
Inferno875%1.0816.8
Nuke250%1.3018.0
Cache250%1.2319.5
Overpass1100%1.9121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
89.2%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
552msReaction time
18.7%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
7.05HE damage / grenade
2.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4701 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.7097% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–6-0.0124%29 Aug
mirage16–120.0433%29 Aug
office13–7-0.0435%26 Aug
anubis13–110.0123%26 Aug
ancient0–7-0.090%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0826%24 Aug
ancient19–170.0225%22 Aug
anubis13–80.0322%22 Aug
mirage13–10.0611%20 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0112%18 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0011%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0414%18 Aug
mirage16–140.0221%15 Aug
dust213–90.0719%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0614%15 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0614%12 Aug
ancient10–130.0123%10 Aug
ancient19–17-0.0020%10 Aug
dust27–130.0222%10 Aug
dust213–50.0539%9 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0224%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0213%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0536%7 Aug
mirage8–130.0221%6 Aug
ancient17–190.0022%4 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0211%4 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0224%13 Jul
cache10–13-0.0533%12 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0124%12 Jul
inferno11–3-0.0627%9 Jul
boulder13–110.0218%8 Jul
mirage9–130.0222%6 Jul
anubis13–80.0220%6 Jul
ancient13–100.0027%3 Jul
anubis13–50.0323%21 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0415%14 Jun
mirage13–30.0419%14 Jun
inferno1–9-0.1818%7 Jun
dust23–13-0.0221%7 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0520%6 Jun
mirage13–90.0217%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0119%31 May
mirage11–130.0122%31 May
inferno13–80.0616%30 May
dust211–13-0.0818%30 May
mirage13–8-0.0621%30 May
ancient13–40.0224%28 May
inferno13–70.0825%28 May
mirage11–13-0.0015%28 May
dust210–130.0729%27 May
ancient9–130.0216%27 May
mirage13–11-0.0222%27 May
nuke9–13-0.0211%27 May
ancient16–14-0.0214%22 May
dust214–160.0423%21 May
anubis15–15-0.0614%21 May
anubis16–140.1019%21 May
mirage15–15-0.0320%21 May
mirage7–130.0124%21 May
anubis13–11-0.0121%20 May
dust213–10-0.0230%17 May
dust29–130.0223%15 May
overpass8–13-0.0325%15 May
dust213–70.0321%15 May
inferno9–130.0119%14 May
mirage5–130.0020%14 May
mirage13–9-0.0014%14 May
anubis13–90.018%14 May
ancient16–130.0415%13 May
nuke1–13-0.0023%13 May
anubis4–1-0.060%13 May
mirage13–110.0326%12 May
anubis13–5-0.0611%12 May
ancient13–30.0814%12 May
mirage9–130.0016%11 May
anubis10–130.0117%11 May
mirage13–110.0519%11 May
anubis4–13-0.0516%11 May
dust213–6-0.0036%11 May
dust29–130.0029%11 May
mirage9–13-0.0828%5 May
overpass13–90.0313%2 May
mirage13–5-0.0119%2 May
ancient6–130.0316%2 May
inferno13–60.0033%2 May
nuke10–13-0.0219%2 May
ancient10–130.0118%2 May
mirage13–6-0.0419%2 May
inferno1–9-0.206%1 May
inferno9–50.1522%1 May
inferno9–50.1024%1 May
dust29–13-0.0117%27 Apr
inferno5–9-0.1533%24 Apr
inferno9–50.1339%24 Apr
inferno9–40.2018%24 Apr
inferno9–40.0936%24 Apr
inferno9–20.2045%24 Apr
inferno8–80.0128%24 Apr
inferno9–30.1122%24 Apr
inferno9–50.1457%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →