Kani

Kani — CS2 Stats

76561198253368242[U:1:293102514]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,917Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,050Light Blue band · top ~64.2% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1316Premier CS Rating · 6,734 → 8,050

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,050 +3,678 16 Sept – 15 Oct · 14 days played
4,3668,084peak 8,08416 Sept15 Oct
8,317Peak Premier in tracked matches
14Days played since 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 34 below peak (8,084)
  • +3,678 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,950 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKaniPREMIER8,050 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning46
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +9.6pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 746ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 755ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 721ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility4.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 748ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.6
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time748ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 724ms → last ⅓ avg 748ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 13 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 15 Oct →
531msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
2–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 22dust2Weakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2313–1057%0.00
infernoA2213–959%-0.03
mirageD195–1426%-0.02
dust2D112–918%-0.01
anubisB105–550%-0.01
ancientA95–456%0.00
cacheB63–350%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
748msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
32.0%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
4.48HE damage / grenade
5.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 748.469ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3898 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5621% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0535%15 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0430%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0223%15 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0234%15 Oct →
anubis13–90.0115%15 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0715%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0128%14 Oct →
mirage9–130.0119%14 Oct →
nuke6–130.0120%14 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0120%14 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0014%14 Oct →
dust210–130.0113%14 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0114%13 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0529%13 Oct →
cache6–13-0.1017%13 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0212%13 Oct →
inferno3–130.0010%13 Oct →
nuke13–40.0922%13 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0310%13 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.073%13 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.075%13 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0710%13 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.016%13 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.089%13 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0313%13 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0723%13 Oct →
mirage13–30.0218%13 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0321%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.1211%13 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0917%12 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0916%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0814%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0521%12 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.1010%12 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0914%12 Oct →
mirage13–30.0526%11 Oct →
inferno11–130.0115%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.0825%10 Oct →
mirage16–140.0020%10 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0215%10 Oct →
nuke10–130.0614%10 Oct →
ancient13–70.0212%10 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0412%10 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0317%10 Oct →
cache13–90.0412%10 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.074%10 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0620%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.093%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0812%10 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0717%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0422%10 Oct →
inferno10–1-0.0116%10 Oct →
dust212–160.0125%10 Oct →
mirage14–160.0011%10 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0418%10 Oct →
inferno11–130.0113%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0220%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.029%10 Oct →
dust210–130.0122%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0419%10 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0514%9 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0117%9 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0723%9 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.068%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0112%25 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0611%23 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0021%23 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0410%23 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0121%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0018%23 Sept →
inferno13–30.0612%23 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0123%23 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0217%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0718%23 Sept →
anubis13–80.0816%23 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0126%23 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0223%22 Sept →
nuke13–50.0510%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.0223%22 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0224%22 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0216%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0112%22 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0328%20 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0319%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.1022%20 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0212%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0626%18 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0217%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0319%18 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0210%18 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0414%17 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0118%17 Sept →
nuke15–150.1218%17 Sept →
ancient6–130.0018%17 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0118%17 Sept →
ancient13–40.0430%17 Sept →
inferno13–40.0115%16 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0014%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0418%16 Sept →
ancient13–00.068%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.