niKs

niKs — CS2 Stats

DE76561198244829392[U:1:284563664]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,500Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,577Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+18Tracked matches · now 1,500
+9.4ppWin rate · 44.4% → 53.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 10 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

26Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.0%44.8%45.7%7.8% short
Shot accuracy13.4%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.041.050.15 short
Match win rate35.8%45.2%45.7%9.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGniKsFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning41
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY394912Last 10039%Win rateTWWWWWLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 622 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 1253 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch0.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time537ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–7 · vertigo, 30 Jul
38%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · cache, 17 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · boulder, 28 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1541127%-0.04
nukeC145936%0.03
cacheC94544%-0.00
anubisC73443%-0.02
boulderS75271%0.01
ancientB63350%0.01
vertigoB63350%-0.01
poseidonB63350%0.01
dust2D6060%-0.02
shelterD51420%-0.02
mirage42250%0.02
train43175%0.03
overpass41325%-0.04
fachwerk32167%0.00
eldorado3030%-0.07
debris1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,358Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
4,613Matches
35.8%Match win rate
38.0%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
7,900MVPs
1,772Hours (in match)
3,296Bombs planted
643Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,505
AWP12,456
MP91,475
SG 5531,417
P901,313

Lifetime map wins

5,094dust2
3,845inferno
3,083nuke
2,358vertigo
1,186train
814cbble
358lake
259office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
55%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
71.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4176%0.9813.4
Ancient2458%1.0513.4
Vertigo1947%0.9914.9
Mirage1338%0.8714.1
Dust2944%0.8914.1
Nuke757%0.7911.1
Inferno520%0.7810.2
Overpass2100%0.809.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
522msReaction time
31.7%T opening success
36.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
4.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.009% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6836% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.0210%19 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0413%19 Sept
cache6–00.0213%19 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0311%19 Sept
anubis13–100.0217%18 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0314%18 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0521%18 Sept
cache7–13-0.0515%18 Sept
train13–3-0.0114%18 Sept
cache12–12-0.0312%18 Sept
anubis9–13-0.077%18 Sept
cache12–120.0711%18 Sept
poseidon9–60.1323%17 Sept
ancient1–130.0218%4 Sept
ancient11–130.0815%4 Sept
mirage13–110.0817%4 Sept
fachwerk13–60.0212%2 Sept
boulder13–2-0.0414%2 Sept
train13–60.0219%29 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0416%29 Aug
overpass13–5-0.017%29 Aug
anubis5–13-0.080%29 Aug
cache13–70.0511%29 Aug
dust24–13-0.0414%29 Aug
dust25–13-0.0211%29 Aug
nuke1–9-0.2113%29 Aug
nuke5–90.1317%24 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.0430%24 Aug
nuke9–50.0937%24 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1811%24 Aug
shelter6–13-0.0718%24 Aug
boulder12–120.0113%24 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0016%24 Aug
dust20–130.0424%23 Aug
nuke6–90.1011%14 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.0813%14 Aug
inferno7–90.0719%10 Aug
nuke2–9-0.1417%10 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0018%10 Aug
poseidon6–90.0526%9 Aug
inferno1–9-0.209%9 Aug
vertigo9–70.1812%30 Jul
nuke9–10.116%30 Jul
inferno7–90.1822%30 Jul
nuke2–9-0.0816%29 Jul
shelter8–130.0330%29 Jul
anubis8–130.0213%28 Jul
boulder13–00.0920%28 Jul
overpass12–120.0013%28 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.1525%28 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0612%27 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0418%27 Jul
anubis10–130.014%27 Jul
boulder13–3-0.0111%27 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0618%27 Jul
shelter9–13-0.0212%27 Jul
vertigo6–9-0.095%25 Jul
inferno8–8-0.115%25 Jul
fachwerk9–13-0.078%24 Jul
boulder13–80.0419%24 Jul
poseidon7–90.0121%24 Jul
cache13–10.0417%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0522%21 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0519%18 Jul
boulder13–2-0.0418%18 Jul
cache4–13-0.0521%18 Jul
cache10–130.0038%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0113%17 Jul
debris8–8-0.0811%17 Jul
eldorado0–8-0.110%17 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.1226%16 Jul
nuke8–80.1429%16 Jul
inferno8–80.0815%14 Jul
poseidon9–70.0919%14 Jul
nuke9–10.1424%14 Jul
boulder12–120.015%13 Jul
shelter7–13-0.037%13 Jul
fachwerk13–40.0510%13 Jul
nuke9–40.1828%13 Jul
inferno5–9-0.029%13 Jul
nuke7–90.0614%13 Jul
poseidon9–6-0.0629%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0215%12 Jul
cache13–3-0.0515%12 Jul
dust212–12-0.0323%12 Jul
anubis13–10.0115%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0222%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0320%12 Jul
vertigo13–6-0.0011%11 Jul
train13–100.0723%11 Jul
ancient13–40.0228%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0223%11 Jul
train3–130.0216%11 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0412%11 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1317%11 Jul
inferno1–13-0.109%11 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0018%10 Jul
inferno11–13-0.058%10 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0813%10 Jul
eldorado3–90.0222%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →