CousCous

CousCous — CS2 Stats

CH76561198234135504[U:1:273869776]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,490Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,319Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,207 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,207 → 2,207
+2Tracked matches · now 2,490
0.0ppWin rate · 31.0% → 31.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,797 +4,086 19 May – 5 Jul · 13 days played
22,71127,944peak 27,94419 May5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,207 +0 3 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
2,2072,207peak 2,2073 Sept23 Sept
27,944Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,207Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-05-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,207
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 293 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.94——
Headshot %39%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches14——
Win rate21%——
K/D0.77——
Headshot %38%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.3%46.8%48.2%6.9% short
Shot accuracy18.3%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.061.070.17 short
Match win rate41.3%46.3%46.9%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCousCousFACEITLevel 8 · 2,207 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO2,207csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning44
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–53–8Last 10039%Win rateLWLLLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 1–8–1 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time546ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 12 Jun →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 9 Jun →
352msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 11 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 6 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC198–1142%-0.02
nukeD186–1233%-0.01
infernoD164–1225%-0.03
dust2C135–838%-0.04
anubisB115–645%0.01
ancientC104–640%-0.01
vertigoS54–180%0.08
cache—41–325%-0.02
overpass—42–250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

180,133Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
7,692Matches
41.3%Match win rate
41.3%Headshot %
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
22,943MVPs
3,874Hours (in match)
5,457Bombs planted
4,377Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,085
AWP34,161
MP93,982
Knife3,483
FAMAS3,043

Lifetime map wins

14,410dust2
11,207inferno
6,663nuke
4,850vertigo
2,316train
1,383cbble
653lake
209office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,478Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
75.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis9768%1.0616.0
Mirage5845%0.8613.3
Nuke5343%0.9415.9
Inferno4844%0.8914.0
Ancient3633%0.8515.4
Dust23256%1.2914.1
Vertigo2850%1.0016.4
Overpass1662%0.9915.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
542msReaction time
51.5%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
9.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4875 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.9692% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0021%22 Sept →
inferno13–80.0313%22 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0831%22 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0014%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.057%11 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0112%11 Sept →
dust24–13-0.070%11 Sept →
ancient11–130.0427%9 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0015%9 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0118%15 Aug →
dust213–100.0417%15 Aug →
overpass9–5-0.0518%10 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0320%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0421%8 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0421%8 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0423%8 Aug →
inferno14–160.0114%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0217%4 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0222%2 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0114%2 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0523%19 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0719%11 Jul →
inferno13–110.0622%11 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.059%11 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0110%11 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0617%10 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0218%10 Jul →
dust20–13-0.0729%10 Jul →
ancient13–90.1318%10 Jul →
anubis13–40.0713%10 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0117%9 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0014%9 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0340%9 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0120%5 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0511%5 Jul →
anubis10–130.0521%4 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0215%4 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0411%4 Jul →
nuke11–130.0312%4 Jul →
anubis13–70.0517%4 Jul →
mirage13–80.0031%4 Jul →
dust210–130.0018%3 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.078%3 Jul →
inferno3–130.0223%3 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0926%3 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0115%3 Jul →
mirage13–100.0722%3 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0219%3 Jul →
nuke15–150.0513%1 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0020%1 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0710%1 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0213%1 Jul →
overpass3–13-0.0423%30 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0117%30 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0116%30 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0318%28 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0412%28 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0412%28 Jun →
anubis12–120.0317%21 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0219%14 Jun →
ancient13–90.0716%14 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0911%14 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.067%14 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0312%14 Jun →
vertigo9–50.087%13 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1011%13 Jun →
inferno6–9-0.1428%12 Jun →
nuke5–9-0.0315%12 Jun →
nuke6–9-0.0428%12 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0125%12 Jun →
vertigo9–40.1713%12 Jun →
vertigo8–80.0224%12 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0126%12 Jun →
nuke13–110.1322%9 Jun →
mirage0–13-0.0850%9 Jun →
nuke13–7-0.0121%7 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0937%7 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0531%7 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0622%6 Jun →
mirage13–20.0124%6 Jun →
anubis13–00.1117%6 Jun →
vertigo9–5-0.0016%4 Jun →
inferno9–4-0.0043%4 Jun →
overpass9–70.0615%4 Jun →
vertigo9–50.1419%3 Jun →
inferno9–60.0420%3 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.0527%3 Jun →
mirage6–130.0114%2 Jun →
anubis13–100.0311%2 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.0716%2 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0529%2 Jun →
dust216–140.0318%2 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.0411%27 May →
overpass8–8-0.0519%27 May →
inferno2–9-0.1814%27 May →
nuke13–80.0121%20 May →
mirage13–11-0.0222%20 May →
dust25–13-0.0318%20 May →
dust24–13-0.0014%20 May →
nuke13–9-0.0118%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.