wHol

wHol — CS2 Stats

76561198233146284[U:1:272880556]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,448Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,549Top 25% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45065 of 233939 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,448 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 8 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,549 -386 8 Jun19 Sept · 31 days played
18,59124,425peak 24,4258 Jun19 Sept
24,425Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-06-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,876 below peak (24,425)
  • +1,393 over 30 days · improving
  • -948 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,451 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwHolFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,549 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateWLWLTWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time526ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 11 Aug
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 25 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · dust2, 7 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B33151845%0.00
mirageA1710759%0.02
infernoS1410471%0.05
ancientB126650%0.01
cacheA116555%0.01
anubisB84450%0.01
nukeC52340%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

470Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
83.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4551%1.1117.5
Inferno3155%1.1917.3
Ancient2857%1.1817.6
Anubis2850%1.1015.6
Dust21963%1.2616.8
Overpass1580%1.4217.5
Vertigo1070%1.3216.1
Nuke967%1.3817.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
528msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
35.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.66HE damage / grenade
9.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4998% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.0315%7 Sept
dust23–13-0.1218%7 Sept
nuke16–120.0011%7 Sept
dust29–130.0218%7 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0017%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0315%6 Sept
dust25–13-0.0931%6 Sept
dust24–13-0.0518%6 Sept
inferno13–70.0421%6 Sept
inferno13–50.0913%6 Sept
anubis6–130.0222%6 Sept
mirage6–130.0518%6 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0119%31 Aug
mirage14–160.0124%31 Aug
inferno13–80.0721%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0225%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0927%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0324%24 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0410%23 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0112%23 Aug
dust213–70.0311%23 Aug
ancient7–130.0011%22 Aug
cache13–40.023%22 Aug
inferno13–110.1231%21 Aug
dust215–15-0.0216%16 Aug
ancient13–110.0316%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.045%16 Aug
dust24–13-0.0813%16 Aug
cache13–40.0827%16 Aug
dust26–13-0.0623%16 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0423%16 Aug
ancient0–6-0.040%15 Aug
dust216–140.039%15 Aug
dust216–130.0318%15 Aug
dust211–130.038%14 Aug
ancient13–50.0312%14 Aug
dust21–13-0.0620%14 Aug
inferno13–70.1813%11 Aug
dust213–70.0713%11 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1012%10 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0510%10 Aug
cache13–90.0215%10 Aug
dust213–110.0311%10 Aug
dust213–30.0813%10 Aug
anubis13–60.0213%9 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0513%9 Aug
ancient13–110.0616%9 Aug
anubis10–130.0615%8 Aug
ancient13–60.1117%7 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0611%7 Aug
mirage13–70.1115%7 Aug
cache9–13-0.0616%4 Aug
anubis13–110.0116%4 Aug
cache13–100.0623%3 Aug
mirage16–130.0417%3 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0118%3 Aug
dust28–130.0815%2 Aug
dust213–7-0.0712%1 Aug
anubis9–130.0124%27 Jul
cache13–90.0718%27 Jul
anubis16–140.0213%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0821%26 Jul
dust213–4-0.0119%26 Jul
dust213–20.0524%26 Jul
dust213–70.0723%26 Jul
dust213–60.0420%26 Jul
cache13–160.0516%25 Jul
dust213–10-0.0147%25 Jul
ancient3–130.0022%25 Jul
dust213–160.0526%20 Jul
dust28–130.0721%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0922%20 Jul
inferno13–80.1222%20 Jul
cache3–13-0.0318%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0923%20 Jul
inferno13–160.0419%19 Jul
inferno13–40.0621%18 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0717%12 Jul
cache13–5-0.0121%12 Jul
dust211–130.0323%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0218%12 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0313%6 Jul
mirage13–30.086%29 Jun
dust211–13-0.0328%23 Jun
inferno8–13-0.1122%15 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0612%15 Jun
dust216–130.0016%14 Jun
inferno16–120.0413%14 Jun
mirage13–70.0116%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.048%14 Jun
inferno13–50.0522%14 Jun
dust24–130.0421%14 Jun
anubis16–140.0311%14 Jun
mirage13–90.0420%14 Jun
dust210–130.0119%10 Jun
mirage5–130.0420%8 Jun
nuke2–13-0.062%8 Jun
dust29–13-0.028%8 Jun
mirage0–5-0.0529%8 Jun
nuke13–70.0326%8 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →