^_^

^_^ — CS2 Stats

76561198222860824[U:1:262595096]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

790Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,257Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,762Blue band · top ~35% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,762 +1,663 17 Jul – 24 Oct · 33 days played
12,09915,719peak 15,71917 Jul24 Oct
15,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-07-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,957 below peak (15,719)
  • -900 over 30 days · declining
  • +478 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,238 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.6%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy11.0%11.2%12.0%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.010.991.02meets
Match win rate44.0%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG^_^FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,762 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning55
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateTLLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−105ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–9 · cache, 20 Jul →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 22 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · office, 22 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5vertigoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2615–1158%0.03
anubisB157–847%0.02
cacheC135–838%0.04
ancientC125–742%0.04
infernoC104–640%0.03
vertigoD61–517%-0.03
officeB63–350%-0.01
nukeD62–433%-0.03
mirageA53–260%0.03
overpass—11–0100%-0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,699Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,740Matches
44.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
45.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11.0%Shot accuracy
5,886MVPs
1,035Hours (in match)
3,061Bombs planted
593Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,803dust2
2,559inferno
1,605nuke
1,222office
951vertigo
731train
211cbble
130lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

234Matches
49%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.1214.0
Ancient560%1.1413.6
Inferno40%0.7213.8
Vertigo20%0.7512.0
Anubis250%0.818.0
Nuke250%0.9212.0
Dust210%0.9417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
548msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
6.17HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo12–12-0.0817%26 Oct →
office8–130.0124%26 Oct →
office10–13-0.077%25 Oct →
dust213–80.149%24 Oct →
anubis8–130.0321%24 Oct →
anubis9–130.0412%24 Oct →
ancient9–130.0220%23 Oct →
office13–30.1543%23 Oct →
office13–7-0.0738%22 Oct →
vertigo5–13-0.0831%20 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0822%19 Oct →
anubis13–60.0822%13 Oct →
vertigo2–13-0.0450%13 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0528%13 Oct →
cache10–130.0227%12 Oct →
ancient14–160.0825%11 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0326%11 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0814%11 Oct →
cache15–150.0814%9 Oct →
mirage13–30.0817%9 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.038%9 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0419%7 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0116%7 Oct →
dust213–50.0619%7 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0021%7 Oct →
inferno16–120.0415%6 Oct →
mirage6–130.0519%6 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0722%6 Oct →
ancient13–30.0624%6 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0626%6 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0225%5 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0319%5 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0315%1 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0730%1 Oct →
anubis13–90.0622%30 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0316%30 Sept →
anubis13–20.0633%30 Sept →
cache7–130.0522%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.1322%29 Sept →
dust213–80.0724%29 Sept →
dust28–130.0525%29 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0318%26 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0016%26 Sept →
cache3–60.1017%26 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0423%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0520%25 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0213%25 Sept →
cache13–60.0511%25 Sept →
cache13–100.1018%25 Sept →
dust213–70.0826%22 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0325%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0126%22 Sept →
office13–9-0.0238%16 Sept →
office8–13-0.0619%16 Sept →
dust213–20.0524%16 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0214%10 Sept →
ancient8–130.1335%7 Aug →
inferno13–90.1240%7 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0733%6 Aug →
anubis9–130.1423%6 Aug →
inferno13–30.1421%6 Aug →
dust213–110.0113%3 Aug →
dust213–60.0416%3 Aug →
mirage13–90.0618%3 Aug →
cache8–13-0.077%2 Aug →
dust211–130.1319%30 Jul →
dust213–110.0719%30 Jul →
vertigo10–13-0.018%27 Jul →
cache3–130.0211%27 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.029%27 Jul →
dust216–130.0039%27 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0118%26 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0619%26 Jul →
overpass13–11-0.1419%25 Jul →
dust213–40.0234%25 Jul →
cache10–130.0721%25 Jul →
anubis11–130.0818%24 Jul →
dust211–130.0417%24 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0216%24 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0018%23 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0118%23 Jul →
anubis13–60.0520%23 Jul →
cache13–70.0116%23 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0416%23 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0132%22 Jul →
vertigo12–12-0.0317%22 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0558%22 Jul →
inferno15–150.0013%21 Jul →
dust213–50.0928%20 Jul →
mirage13–50.0213%20 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0014%20 Jul →
cache13–90.1924%20 Jul →
dust213–90.0835%20 Jul →
ancient13–60.1522%19 Jul →
dust213–70.0419%19 Jul →
inferno7–130.0725%19 Jul →
dust213–90.0735%19 Jul →
inferno10–130.0311%18 Jul →
ancient13–80.0219%18 Jul →
dust28–130.0026%17 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.