knorrk19

knorrk19 — CS2 Stats

76561198222154648[U:1:261888920]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,598Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,714Top 10% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14694 of 252286 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,598 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,714 +2,517 2 Aug – 21 Sept · 29 days played
21,95126,570peak 26,5702 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,512 +0 28 Aug – 31 Aug · 2 observations
1,5121,512peak 1,51228 Aug31 Aug
26,570Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,512Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 856 below peak (26,570)
  • +1,288 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,286 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGknorrk19FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER25,714 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,512csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning62
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 444ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 451ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility3.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.2
Utility3.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time453ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 453ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 5 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 22 Aug →
352msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 72% over 18ancientWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2918–1162%0.01
anubisC219–1243%0.03
cacheS1813–572%0.02
ancientC176–1135%0.02
infernoC125–742%0.00
nuke—30–30%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,514Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
81.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient33153%1.1116.8
Anubis28756%1.1617.2
Inferno18453%1.1416.8
Dust214145%1.0716.4
Mirage13642%1.0015.6
Overpass6448%1.1517.3
Nuke6143%1.0816.0
Vertigo4351%1.0716.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
6.1°Preaim
455msReaction time
40.6%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.59HE damage / grenade
5.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3238 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.0112%9 Sept →
inferno8–130.0230%9 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0714%9 Sept →
cache13–110.0129%7 Sept →
dust29–13-0.089%7 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0417%7 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0516%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0113%1 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0616%1 Sept →
inferno13–60.1210%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0118%31 Aug →
anubis5–130.0216%31 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0814%30 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0126%30 Aug →
anubis13–60.0619%30 Aug →
dust214–160.0118%29 Aug →
dust215–150.0319%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0120%29 Aug →
dust213–9-0.069%29 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0218%29 Aug →
anubis15–150.0321%29 Aug →
ancient15–150.0522%28 Aug →
cache14–160.0032%28 Aug →
anubis4–130.0221%25 Aug →
dust213–20.069%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.1119%24 Aug →
ancient13–100.1217%24 Aug →
anubis13–100.0216%24 Aug →
cache13–100.0018%24 Aug →
dust213–40.0129%23 Aug →
anubis13–10.138%23 Aug →
ancient15–150.0924%22 Aug →
dust213–40.0342%22 Aug →
cache8–130.0126%22 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0516%22 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0525%21 Aug →
dust213–60.0226%21 Aug →
cache16–140.0612%21 Aug →
anubis13–70.1012%21 Aug →
cache11–130.0829%21 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.030%18 Aug →
cache13–100.118%18 Aug →
dust213–100.0418%17 Aug →
anubis13–30.0312%17 Aug →
ancient13–90.0515%17 Aug →
dust213–10.093%17 Aug →
anubis11–130.0619%16 Aug →
inferno13–100.0422%16 Aug →
dust213–40.0723%16 Aug →
ancient10–130.037%16 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0227%16 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0215%15 Aug →
inferno13–10.109%15 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0121%15 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0318%15 Aug →
dust216–140.0017%15 Aug →
ancient7–130.0221%15 Aug →
dust213–110.0328%15 Aug →
cache13–100.038%15 Aug →
ancient7–130.0011%15 Aug →
nuke5–130.0728%14 Aug →
ancient16–120.0521%14 Aug →
dust210–130.0032%14 Aug →
cache13–70.0421%14 Aug →
anubis13–60.1021%14 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0319%13 Aug →
anubis10–130.0210%12 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0417%12 Aug →
cache13–60.0038%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0420%12 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0029%12 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.048%11 Aug →
dust213–100.1029%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0215%10 Aug →
cache13–50.006%10 Aug →
ancient7–130.019%10 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0317%10 Aug →
dust215–150.0118%9 Aug →
anubis13–70.0512%9 Aug →
anubis10–130.0416%9 Aug →
anubis11–130.0216%8 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0330%8 Aug →
inferno11–130.0233%6 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0412%6 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0223%6 Aug →
dust23–130.0321%5 Aug →
cache13–40.1412%5 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0018%5 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.038%3 Aug →
dust213–50.0415%3 Aug →
anubis13–80.0116%3 Aug →
dust211–30.1129%3 Aug →
nuke9–130.0517%3 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0229%3 Aug →
dust213–90.0419%3 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0515%3 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0115%3 Aug →
ancient7–130.0628%2 Aug →
anubis13–60.0614%2 Aug →
anubis9–130.0312%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.