Xiphactinus™

Xiphactinus™ — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198217687675[U:1:257421947]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

741Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,591Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,540Blue band · top ~52% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 8 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,540 -10 8 Jul17 Sept · 11 days played
10,48811,091peak 11,0918 Jul17 Sept
11,416Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2025-07-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 551 below peak (11,091)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,460 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=19,543), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate35.3%41.9%44.3%9.1% short
Shot accuracy16.0%9.6%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.350.981.03above
Match win rate41.9%43.8%45.2%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXiphactinus™PREMIER10,540 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning63
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42562Last 10042%Win rateLLLWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.0
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.3
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 1–3 · mirage, 25 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · anubis, 12 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC35142140%0.01
infernoB147750%0.01
ancientC135838%-0.01
dust2S118373%-0.00
nukeD103730%0.01
anubisD82625%0.00
cache41325%-0.00
train31233%0.01
vertigo110100%0.04
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,364Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of Blue band
5,357Matches
41.9%Match win rate
35.3%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Blue band
10,929MVPs
1,442Hours (in match)
3,760Bombs planted
1,521Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,075
AWP16,382
FAMAS1,984
SSG 081,696
MP91,638

Lifetime map wins

4,516inferno
2,653dust2
2,179vertigo
2,114nuke
1,793train
703cbble
580office
399lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
577msReaction time
49.8%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
5.39HE damage / grenade
6.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0214%17 Sept
inferno7–130.0917%17 Sept
mirage14–160.0110%16 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0411%16 Sept
mirage13–110.0923%16 Sept
vertigo13–110.0417%14 Sept
ancient3–13-0.046%14 Sept
mirage10–130.0611%14 Sept
mirage13–100.0213%14 Sept
inferno13–90.0121%14 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0915%14 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0225%13 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0111%13 Sept
nuke0–13-0.0415%13 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0223%13 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0313%13 Sept
cache5–13-0.0616%12 Sept
dust216–130.0317%12 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0118%12 Sept
anubis11–130.0716%11 Sept
nuke13–30.0618%11 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0519%11 Sept
anubis4–130.0113%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0127%9 Sept
inferno13–7-0.039%9 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0215%7 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0210%6 Sept
dust22–90.0112%6 Sept
mirage8–130.1216%5 Sept
ancient13–100.0321%5 Sept
inferno13–70.048%5 Sept
inferno13–40.1122%26 Jul
dust213–10-0.037%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0816%26 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0218%25 Jul
dust213–30.0536%25 Jul
mirage13–40.1336%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0327%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0614%25 Jul
mirage1–30.1522%25 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0226%25 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0111%24 Jul
inferno5–130.0422%20 Jul
mirage11–130.0119%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.067%11 Jun
dust211–00.030%11 Jun
dust21–13-0.1010%27 May
nuke6–130.0115%27 May
cache5–13-0.0416%1 May
inferno13–10-0.027%30 Apr
cache13–60.1116%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0113%30 Apr
ancient11–130.0018%28 Apr
mirage2–13-0.1019%27 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0428%27 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0511%24 Apr
mirage4–130.0113%24 Apr
nuke13–100.0118%24 Apr
ancient5–130.0013%20 Apr
nuke11–130.0515%17 Apr
mirage13–60.0216%17 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0423%16 Apr
inferno16–130.0218%16 Apr
ancient1–11-0.0731%16 Apr
dust213–90.0014%16 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0417%16 Apr
anubis13–90.0011%16 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0713%16 Apr
ancient9–130.0117%15 Apr
nuke14–160.0631%15 Apr
ancient13–30.1123%15 Apr
nuke13–160.0324%14 Apr
overpass1–13-0.0822%14 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0314%13 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0421%13 Apr
anubis4–130.0139%12 Apr
inferno12–120.0221%9 Feb
mirage13–30.0728%6 Feb
anubis7–130.0023%6 Feb
mirage2–130.0227%28 Jan
dust213–10.0423%28 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0413%28 Aug
inferno16–140.0222%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0113%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0119%12 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0412%8 Aug
mirage1–13-0.028%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0014%7 Aug
train9–130.0216%3 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0412%27 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0316%26 Jul
dust213–60.0311%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0513%15 Jul
dust213–8-0.0323%15 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0116%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0624%10 Jul
ancient13–90.0137%9 Jul
train13–100.0219%9 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0719%8 Jul
train8–13-0.0128%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →