ブランドン

ブランドン — CS2 Stats

US76561198217215384[U:1:256949656]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,974Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating8,145Light Blue band · top ~63.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 612 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,145 +20 30 Aug – 11 Oct · 17 days played
6,05410,190peak 10,19030 Aug11 Oct
11,224Peak Premier in tracked matches
612Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 612
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 139 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,045 below peak (10,190)
  • -2,045 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,855 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGブランドンFACEITLevel 2 · 612 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER8,145 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO612csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning38
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLWTLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +101ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility4.7
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 24% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning3.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time629ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy9.7%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.4% → last ⅓ avg 9.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 19 Sept →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 10 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · anubis, 7 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2815–1354%0.01
nukeB2412–1250%0.01
dust2B1910–953%0.01
infernoD92–722%-0.01
anubisS75–271%0.04
ancientD70–70%-0.02
cacheS64–267%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

265Matches
48%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
62.7ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7555%0.9812.5
Dust24255%0.9211.8
Inferno2138%0.9913.5
Vertigo2040%0.8411.4
Nuke1850%1.3610.5
Ancient1436%0.7010.8
Anubis1258%0.7611.8
Overpass540%0.9214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.9%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.9%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
636msReaction time
47.9%T opening success
24.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
8.32HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.8536% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 24.1423% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–14-0.055%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.054%11 Oct →
mirage13–80.0010%11 Oct →
dust215–15-0.068%11 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0212%10 Oct →
mirage13–10.1110%10 Oct →
cache13–6-0.068%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0112%10 Oct →
anubis13–100.016%10 Oct →
cache13–10-0.045%10 Oct →
inferno7–130.0017%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0610%9 Oct →
mirage13–40.0316%9 Oct →
nuke8–130.028%9 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.049%7 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.067%7 Oct →
dust213–70.099%7 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0417%7 Oct →
anubis0–30.070%7 Oct →
ancient11–130.036%7 Oct →
anubis13–10.116%7 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0813%7 Oct →
mirage13–80.087%7 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0113%7 Oct →
nuke13–30.056%7 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0112%7 Oct →
nuke7–130.0123%7 Oct →
nuke5–130.0011%5 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0410%5 Oct →
cache3–130.027%5 Oct →
ancient10–130.028%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0712%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.0211%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.069%20 Sept →
dust213–110.008%20 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.023%19 Sept →
dust213–110.037%19 Sept →
mirage9–130.028%19 Sept →
dust213–10.0611%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0520%19 Sept →
nuke11–130.0114%19 Sept →
anubis10–130.0210%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.167%19 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0320%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0118%19 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0014%19 Sept →
mirage13–30.1112%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.018%17 Sept →
ancient11–130.0114%15 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0215%15 Sept →
nuke8–130.006%15 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0214%15 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0620%14 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.046%14 Sept →
nuke15–150.0213%14 Sept →
mirage13–60.045%14 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.028%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0910%14 Sept →
mirage5–130.036%13 Sept →
cache13–110.026%13 Sept →
dust213–50.068%13 Sept →
nuke13–70.047%13 Sept →
dust210–13-0.007%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0515%12 Sept →
nuke5–130.044%12 Sept →
nuke13–100.0410%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.036%12 Sept →
anubis13–30.0110%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.053%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0212%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.036%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.068%11 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.053%11 Sept →
dust213–110.018%11 Sept →
mirage13–160.027%11 Sept →
inferno13–30.0322%11 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0213%11 Sept →
dust213–9-0.009%11 Sept →
mirage6–130.036%11 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0226%11 Sept →
dust29–130.129%11 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0010%11 Sept →
nuke13–50.096%11 Sept →
nuke13–30.034%11 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.015%11 Sept →
inferno11–130.046%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.026%11 Sept →
dust29–130.004%11 Sept →
mirage16–120.062%11 Sept →
nuke13–80.0217%11 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0113%11 Sept →
dust213–7-0.018%11 Sept →
mirage13–90.019%10 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0711%10 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.034%10 Sept →
dust23–130.0131%10 Sept →
dust213–60.085%10 Sept →
nuke11–130.0110%10 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0111%9 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.