lalala

lalala — CS2 Stats

SE76561198216934645[U:1:256668917]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

725Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,967Blue band · top ~33.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,967 -957 17 Aug – 18 Oct · 40 days played
11,74115,746peak 15,74617 Aug18 Oct
16,243Peak Premier in tracked matches
904Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 904
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,779 below peak (15,746)
  • -1,779 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,033 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlalalaPREMIER13,967 · Blue bandPEAK ELO904csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning57
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.7
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time595ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 6 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 22 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2611–1542%-0.02
mirageA159–660%-0.01
cacheC145–936%-0.01
nukeD134–931%-0.01
anubisA116–555%-0.02
ancientC104–640%-0.00
dust2S97–278%0.01
overpass—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

213Matches
47%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
75.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23749%0.9013.5
Mirage3063%0.9414.0
Nuke2361%1.0013.2
Inferno2255%0.9713.9
Ancient1850%0.9915.4
Overpass1127%0.9815.4
Anubis1010%0.6511.0
Train10%0.8814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
601msReaction time
62.2%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.58HE damage / grenade
5.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0612% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.018%18 Oct →
cache9–13-0.019%18 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.069%18 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0014%17 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.019%17 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.014%16 Oct →
dust213–90.048%15 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0417%15 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.032%14 Oct →
ancient13–30.0513%14 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0510%11 Oct →
mirage13–50.0110%11 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0313%11 Oct →
dust213–100.086%11 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0417%10 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0716%9 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.038%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0316%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0517%9 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0315%8 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0515%7 Oct →
dust211–130.0118%7 Oct →
anubis13–90.0717%7 Oct →
nuke3–130.0417%7 Oct →
cache13–7-0.029%6 Oct →
cache13–40.1418%6 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0213%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0013%5 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0215%5 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0113%5 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.048%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0215%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0413%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0316%27 Sept →
dust213–50.007%27 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0112%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0014%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.067%25 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.030%25 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0115%24 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0313%24 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0514%24 Sept →
mirage16–140.0513%22 Sept →
cache13–90.017%22 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.067%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0333%22 Sept →
overpass9–30.0923%22 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0419%22 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0616%21 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.059%21 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0111%14 Sept →
cache7–130.0129%14 Sept →
dust213–0-0.0116%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0313%12 Sept →
inferno13–20.0115%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0714%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0115%8 Sept →
inferno13–100.0316%8 Sept →
inferno13–40.0310%8 Sept →
nuke13–60.0213%8 Sept →
ancient13–60.0215%8 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.057%8 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0422%8 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.039%7 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0214%7 Sept →
nuke13–60.0111%7 Sept →
overpass8–13-0.0124%4 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0218%4 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.029%3 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0214%3 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0213%2 Sept →
dust213–40.0314%2 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0212%1 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.028%1 Sept →
dust213–9-0.019%31 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0214%31 Aug →
inferno11–130.0321%28 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.074%27 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0214%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0211%26 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0914%25 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0114%25 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0219%25 Aug →
inferno13–80.0317%24 Aug →
nuke11–130.0417%24 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0316%23 Aug →
inferno13–70.0223%23 Aug →
nuke10–130.0212%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0224%22 Aug →
mirage13–110.0620%22 Aug →
ancient13–110.007%21 Aug →
inferno10–130.0121%21 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0624%21 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0618%20 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.054%20 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0516%19 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1015%19 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0013%17 Aug →
dust213–50.0111%17 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0321%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.