Carbon

Carbon — CS2 Stats

76561198215842853[U:1:255577125]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,669Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#13553 of 260031 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,536 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,010 +445 15 Jun – 21 Jun · 2 days played
25,56526,010peak 26,01015 Jun21 Jun
26,010Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,536Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-03-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,536
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 215 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCarbonFACEITLevel 8 · 1,536 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,536csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning61
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT67–31–2Last 10067%Win rateWWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch5.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time572ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 14 Jun →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 23 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · office, 27 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W5Current streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 85% over 13dust2Weakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B178–947%0.01
mirageA148–657%-0.01
anubisS1410–471%-0.01
nukeS1310–377%0.03
ancientS1311–285%-0.01
cacheB105–550%-0.01
infernoS75–271%-0.02
vertigoS54–180%0.02
train—33–0100%0.05
office—21–150%0.00
overpass—22–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
60%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
83.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2576%1.4517.4
Ancient956%0.8814.4
Dust2862%1.2015.6
Anubis862%1.4222.0
Nuke838%0.9716.5
Inferno743%1.2620.1
Train475%1.2517.3
Overpass250%1.2520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
555msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
7.01HE damage / grenade
9.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0215%1 Nov →
mirage13–90.0217%1 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0016%25 Oct →
cache9–10.0225%25 Oct →
dust213–60.0315%25 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0617%17 Oct →
dust213–50.0210%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0221%27 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0526%27 Sept →
office13–100.0517%26 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.0916%12 Sept →
cache13–80.0222%12 Sept →
inferno7–130.0113%12 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0413%12 Sept →
anubis13–100.0825%12 Sept →
anubis13–90.0626%7 Sept →
overpass13–11-0.0411%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0323%29 Aug →
anubis13–70.1129%29 Aug →
nuke13–30.0619%29 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0020%27 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0221%22 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0125%22 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0326%22 Aug →
ancient7–3-0.090%21 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.0622%21 Aug →
dust213–40.0136%21 Aug →
cache9–130.0013%21 Aug →
dust210–130.0121%4 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0317%2 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0323%1 Jul →
nuke13–90.0417%27 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0114%27 Jun →
cache13–80.0629%27 Jun →
office5–13-0.0435%27 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0513%25 Jun →
cache9–130.0132%24 Jun →
inferno13–40.0133%21 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0310%21 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0218%15 Jun →
dust213–70.0720%15 Jun →
cache4–13-0.1231%14 Jun →
nuke13–80.0117%14 Jun →
dust213–50.0425%14 Jun →
anubis13–100.0533%14 Jun →
nuke13–20.1823%14 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0431%13 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0117%13 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0311%13 Jun →
overpass13–2-0.0118%13 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0419%13 Jun →
dust27–130.0122%13 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0722%3 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0113%2 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0815%2 Jun →
ancient13–70.0223%2 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0317%11 May →
mirage8–13-0.0019%10 May →
vertigo13–50.0015%10 May →
nuke13–11-0.0219%9 May →
mirage13–6-0.0125%9 May →
anubis13–2-0.0814%9 May →
cache10–130.0220%9 May →
mirage13–50.1038%23 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0222%22 Apr →
train13–40.1227%22 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0324%21 Apr →
vertigo13–11-0.0011%12 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.0723%12 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0529%11 Apr →
nuke12–120.0114%11 Apr →
vertigo13–20.0818%11 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0821%10 Apr →
anubis8–3-0.023%8 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0625%8 Apr →
nuke13–10.0910%7 Apr →
dust212–12-0.0513%7 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0321%6 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0114%6 Apr →
ancient13–3-0.0018%6 Apr →
train13–40.0115%6 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0319%5 Apr →
inferno13–50.0515%5 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0625%5 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0216%5 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0413%5 Apr →
vertigo6–13-0.0417%2 Apr →
nuke13–40.0623%2 Apr →
dust213–20.0912%2 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0628%1 Apr →
ancient13–30.0928%31 Mar →
anubis6–2-0.047%31 Mar →
mirage13–100.0216%31 Mar →
ancient13–60.0521%31 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0515%30 Mar →
ancient1–9-0.0110%30 Mar →
nuke13–00.0317%22 Mar →
ancient13–110.0113%22 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.068%22 Mar →
train13–30.0220%22 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.