dan

dan — CS2 Stats

BS76561198214413531[U:1:254147803]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,073Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,491Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33383 of 219748 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,073 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,491 +1,042 21 Jul16 Sept · 25 days played
20,67123,549peak 23,54921 Jul16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,692 +0 31 Aug16 Sept · 5 observations
1,6921,692peak 1,69231 Aug16 Sept
23,688Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,692Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,692
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 58 below peak (23,549)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,509 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdanPREMIER23,491 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,692csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning58
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51427Last 10051%Win rateWWTLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time566ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 16 Sept
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · cache, 3 Sept
344msFastest reaction time · 3–5 · anubis, 13 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA29181162%0.01
dust2B22111150%-0.01
cacheB1991047%0.01
anubisS118373%0.01
ancientD82625%-0.03
overpassD72529%0.05
mirage31233%-0.01
nuke1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

404Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2654%0.9214.6
Anubis2556%0.9113.2
Ancient2138%0.7411.8
Overpass2050%0.8311.9
Mirage1942%0.8313.2
Dust21861%1.1418.2
Nuke3100%1.3911.0
Vertigo20%0.5813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
575msReaction time
50.4%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
10.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4561 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–20.1520%16 Sept
cache13–10.1419%16 Sept
overpass12–120.0937%16 Sept
anubis11–130.0127%14 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0327%14 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0325%13 Sept
anubis3–5-0.078%13 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0522%13 Sept
dust213–70.0227%12 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0126%12 Sept
inferno15–120.0025%12 Sept
dust213–8-0.0212%10 Sept
inferno13–30.0428%10 Sept
cache11–13-0.0729%10 Sept
inferno12–120.0317%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0516%9 Sept
inferno10–130.0427%8 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0125%8 Sept
inferno11–130.0030%6 Sept
anubis13–50.0513%6 Sept
dust29–13-0.0613%6 Sept
inferno13–90.0433%6 Sept
cache13–10-0.0526%5 Sept
ancient13–90.0021%5 Sept
dust215–150.0417%4 Sept
anubis13–60.0425%4 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0820%4 Sept
overpass8–80.0212%4 Sept
cache13–20.0845%3 Sept
inferno13–100.0117%3 Sept
ancient13–30.0335%3 Sept
cache15–150.0020%1 Sept
dust213–100.0416%1 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0511%2 Aug
anubis13–90.0016%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0427%2 Aug
dust213–50.0925%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0513%1 Aug
cache13–40.0525%1 Aug
dust212–160.0222%31 Jul
anubis13–70.0719%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0412%30 Jul
cache13–5-0.0024%30 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0423%30 Jul
overpass13–90.1034%29 Jul
dust213–5-0.028%29 Jul
inferno12–120.0025%29 Jul
cache13–20.1017%29 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0225%29 Jul
cache11–13-0.0122%29 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0125%28 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0515%28 Jul
overpass12–120.0919%27 Jul
dust29–130.0331%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0926%27 Jul
inferno13–50.0531%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0521%26 Jul
cache13–40.0919%25 Jul
dust213–10.0928%25 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0412%25 Jul
overpass13–50.1227%25 Jul
anubis13–30.0422%25 Jul
inferno13–60.0223%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0412%25 Jul
cache9–13-0.0321%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0529%25 Jul
dust213–3-0.0126%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0126%24 Jul
cache11–130.0217%24 Jul
dust24–13-0.0218%24 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0326%24 Jul
dust24–13-0.0723%24 Jul
inferno2–130.0124%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.0610%23 Jul
dust213–70.0117%23 Jul
overpass10–130.0010%23 Jul
inferno13–90.0513%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0121%22 Jul
dust211–13-0.0824%21 Jul
ancient0–13-0.1125%21 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0722%21 Jul
cache8–130.0119%21 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0621%21 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0326%21 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0425%21 Jul
cache13–110.0527%21 Jul
ancient11–130.0124%12 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0115%12 Jul
cache9–130.0125%12 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0829%11 Jul
dust213–50.0426%11 Jul
cache13–5-0.0718%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0616%11 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0113%11 Jul
dust213–70.0027%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0012%10 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0115%10 Jul
anubis13–40.0819%9 Jul
inferno13–110.1325%9 Jul
cache3–13-0.0621%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →