saniozo

saniozo — CS2 Stats

FI76561198212003569[U:1:251737841]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,259Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,572Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,339 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,259 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 9 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,505 +2,058 9 Apr6 Jul · 40 days played
17,26322,035peak 22,0359 Apr6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,339 +0 6 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
1,3391,339peak 1,3396 Sept14 Sept
22,035Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,339Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-04-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,339
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 12 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches110
Win rate100%0%+100pp
K/D0.450.34+0.11
Headshot %77%60%+17pp

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate50.7%44.9%45.8%above
Shot accuracy20.0%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.771.041.050.29 short
Match win rate43.2%45.3%45.7%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsaniozoFACEITLevel 6 · 1,339 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,339csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning52
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateWTWWTWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −10.4pp headshot accuracy · −122ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 302 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility7.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.2
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time650ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · overpass, 21 Apr
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 26 Apr
469msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 3 Jul
13–2Biggest win · cache, 7 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
123In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 45% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB31141745%0.00
nukeB158753%-0.01
dust2A106460%0.00
cacheB105550%-0.01
ancientB105550%0.00
mirageA106460%0.02
anubisS75271%-0.01
overpassS75271%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

327,980Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
10,317Matches
43.2%Match win rate
50.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
20.0%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
26,475MVPs
6,572Hours (in match)
7,240Bombs planted
3,282Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47155,321
AWP25,609
Glock-1812,627
MP93,782
P2503,771
MAC-103,694

Lifetime map wins

32,507inferno
14,097dust2
7,212nuke
6,300train
4,209vertigo
1,908cbble
55office
26lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,379Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
68.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1947%1.1318.1
Anubis1421%0.8213.9
Ancient1258%0.8715.0
Dust21267%1.2015.2
Mirage933%1.0616.2
Overpass425%0.7711.3
Vertigo450%1.1419.0
Nuke333%1.0917.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
644msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
16.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0602% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.0622%14 Sept
cache15–15-0.0216%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0521%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0020%24 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0611%23 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0217%21 Aug
inferno13–110.026%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0510%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.075%14 Aug
nuke4–13-0.028%14 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0617%14 Aug
cache13–80.0218%14 Aug
cache13–20.0427%7 Jul
cache2–13-0.0915%7 Jul
cache3–13-0.0131%7 Jul
ancient9–130.0019%6 Jul
nuke6–130.0131%6 Jul
dust213–80.0732%5 Jul
overpass13–30.0826%5 Jul
ancient13–20.0324%5 Jul
nuke8–13-0.059%3 Jul
dust213–9-0.036%3 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0127%2 Jul
dust213–70.0312%2 Jul
mirage16–130.0022%2 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0515%1 Jul
nuke5–13-0.1011%1 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0016%1 Jul
inferno13–50.0316%30 Jun
inferno9–130.0723%23 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0518%22 Jun
cache5–13-0.0619%22 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0314%22 Jun
mirage9–130.0220%22 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0913%21 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0111%21 Jun
inferno13–80.0210%18 Jun
cache13–11-0.0020%17 Jun
cache13–60.0216%17 Jun
inferno13–40.078%17 Jun
nuke16–140.0019%17 Jun
inferno12–160.0119%17 Jun
anubis13–80.0311%16 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0312%15 Jun
mirage13–40.1028%15 Jun
inferno13–20.0222%15 Jun
inferno8–130.0220%15 Jun
nuke13–80.0833%14 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0722%14 Jun
dust213–16-0.0018%12 Jun
dust210–130.0423%1 Jun
overpass13–3-0.0013%1 Jun
inferno13–80.0311%1 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0113%1 Jun
nuke13–30.0326%31 May
overpass13–80.0119%29 May
mirage13–70.0219%28 May
inferno13–90.0530%27 May
inferno5–13-0.060%26 May
inferno6–13-0.0024%24 May
nuke13–16-0.0227%24 May
inferno13–20.0211%22 May
ancient13–60.0513%20 May
anubis13–11-0.0113%20 May
ancient13–11-0.0430%14 May
overpass13–40.0235%4 May
cache13–60.0218%4 May
cache9–130.0135%4 May
inferno11–13-0.017%28 Apr
inferno11–130.0827%27 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0226%27 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0611%27 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0122%27 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0119%26 Apr
inferno13–10-0.035%26 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0416%26 Apr
dust213–100.0436%26 Apr
inferno13–60.0328%25 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0119%25 Apr
inferno13–110.0221%24 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0211%24 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0025%24 Apr
inferno7–130.0133%24 Apr
nuke16–12-0.0516%24 Apr
anubis13–80.0121%23 Apr
dust213–11-0.0322%23 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0016%22 Apr
mirage13–60.0024%21 Apr
overpass13–30.1214%21 Apr
ancient16–140.0517%20 Apr
inferno11–40.036%20 Apr
mirage13–20.0314%16 Apr
mirage5–130.0223%16 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0419%15 Apr
nuke13–100.0722%15 Apr
nuke16–140.0323%14 Apr
dust22–13-0.0719%10 Apr
ancient8–13-0.078%10 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0416%10 Apr
inferno13–110.0113%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →