Baba

Baba — CS2 Stats

YE76561198211780236[U:1:251514508]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,592Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,848 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,848 → 1,848
+8Tracked matches · now 1,592
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,848 +0 28 Aug16 Sept · 8 observations
1,8481,848peak 1,84828 Aug16 Sept
1,848Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,848
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 153 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBabaFACEITLevel 10 · 1,848 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,848csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning75
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateWLLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.0
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels7.1
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 73% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning7.5
Utility4.0
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels8.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time536ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 491ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 13–6 · train, 16 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 12 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · vertigo, 16 Aug
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 7vertigoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2011955%0.05
anubisB157847%0.04
mirageA127558%0.04
vertigoC125742%0.05
ancientB115645%0.06
cacheA116555%0.03
infernoS76186%0.06
nukeB63350%0.03
train31233%0.14
overpass31233%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

443Matches
58%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
95.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6749%1.1918.7
Dust23858%1.3220.1
Ancient3749%1.2319.0
Nuke2966%1.2519.6
Inferno2959%1.2019.6
Anubis2060%1.2819.9
Cache1369%1.4318.3
Overpass771%1.4019.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
68.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
537msReaction time
73.2%T opening success
60.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
3.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7143 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–13-0.0221%18 Sept
dust27–130.0019%17 Sept
mirage13–160.0411%17 Sept
inferno13–80.0233%17 Sept
vertigo13–160.0420%16 Sept
ancient22–200.1519%16 Sept
anubis11–130.0113%16 Sept
dust213–80.0929%16 Sept
dust219–150.0922%15 Sept
dust213–60.0613%14 Sept
ancient13–40.0215%14 Sept
mirage13–90.0820%14 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0229%14 Sept
anubis13–100.0120%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0026%13 Sept
ancient13–80.0610%13 Sept
train9–13-0.0018%13 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.076%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.1010%13 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0115%13 Sept
inferno13–110.0519%12 Sept
nuke13–100.0321%12 Sept
dust213–80.0932%12 Sept
ancient13–60.1738%12 Sept
cache9–130.0610%12 Sept
vertigo7–130.0721%12 Sept
vertigo19–150.0912%11 Sept
overpass11–13-0.0026%11 Sept
cache5–130.0424%11 Sept
dust29–130.0417%11 Sept
cache16–130.0425%10 Sept
inferno13–80.0820%10 Sept
cache9–13-0.0816%9 Sept
vertigo14–16-0.0215%9 Sept
dust216–130.0413%9 Sept
mirage13–80.0522%9 Sept
dust28–130.0425%9 Sept
anubis13–80.0713%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0215%7 Sept
anubis13–100.0316%7 Sept
dust213–90.0520%7 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0312%7 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0419%7 Sept
vertigo11–130.0413%6 Sept
anubis22–250.0515%6 Sept
nuke13–110.1116%3 Sept
dust26–130.0316%3 Sept
anubis13–40.1911%3 Sept
overpass13–90.1119%3 Sept
anubis7–130.0421%2 Sept
dust26–130.1121%2 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0129%2 Sept
mirage4–130.0512%1 Sept
cache6–13-0.0122%31 Aug
mirage13–60.0412%31 Aug
dust213–40.1415%31 Aug
nuke11–130.0219%30 Aug
cache13–40.0217%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0014%29 Aug
cache16–140.0721%29 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0414%29 Aug
train9–130.1029%29 Aug
dust27–130.0119%29 Aug
cache13–50.0317%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0827%28 Aug
cache13–80.1525%28 Aug
dust213–50.2023%28 Aug
anubis14–160.0419%28 Aug
mirage11–130.0313%27 Aug
dust27–130.0313%27 Aug
dust213–40.0810%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0612%26 Aug
vertigo13–80.0915%26 Aug
vertigo11–130.0720%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0723%26 Aug
dust213–9-0.0613%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0414%26 Aug
cache8–130.0015%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0118%24 Aug
cache13–70.0119%24 Aug
inferno19–150.0727%24 Aug
vertigo13–40.1011%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0122%23 Aug
inferno9–130.0122%22 Aug
anubis15–150.0615%22 Aug
ancient8–130.0617%22 Aug
nuke14–160.0920%21 Aug
inferno13–60.2019%21 Aug
ancient13–80.1229%21 Aug
overpass7–130.0322%21 Aug
vertigo13–70.1128%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0818%21 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0115%19 Aug
nuke13–11-0.038%18 Aug
anubis12–160.0525%17 Aug
dust213–40.0918%16 Aug
vertigo13–10.1317%16 Aug
train13–60.3119%16 Aug
dust28–130.0115%13 Aug
ancient11–130.0813%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →