mark

mark — CS2 Stats

EE76561198211021601[U:1:250755873]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,142Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,698Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#72519 of 255799 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,254 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,684 +684 31 Mar – 4 Aug · 29 days played
19,52521,262peak 21,26231 Mar4 Aug
21,262Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,254Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-03-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,254
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 246 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches15——
Win rate60%——
K/D1.02——
Headshot %47%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 21 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,654), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.8%48.2%50.9%5.1% short
Shot accuracy9.3%13.2%13.7%4.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.071.090.05 short
Match win rate51.2%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarkFACEITLevel 9 · 2,254 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,254csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning63
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −7.0pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility3.8
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time640ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy27.7%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 27.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 21 Apr →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · overpass, 18 May →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 8 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 27 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 24nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2511–1444%0.02
mirageS2418–675%0.05
infernoA127–558%0.02
cacheC114–736%0.01
dust2B105–550%0.01
nukeD71–614%-0.01
anubisB63–350%0.03
overpass—42–250%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,355Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
4,739Matches
51.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
45.8%Headshot %
9.3%Shot accuracy
12,894MVPs
2,141Hours (in match)
4,712Bombs planted
1,868Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,406
AWP9,347
Knife2,716
MP92,086
FAMAS1,766

Lifetime map wins

6,578inferno
5,739dust2
3,267vertigo
3,213nuke
1,009train
247cbble
169office
96italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,106Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
76.1ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage58551%1.1215.4
Ancient23046%1.0615.5
Dust217143%1.0515.4
Anubis17147%1.0915.5
Nuke11250%1.0915.4
Inferno10551%1.1316.2
Vertigo8468%1.1917.1
Overpass4558%1.0214.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
621msReaction time
48.3%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
7.33HE damage / grenade
6.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4047 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.0323%11 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0428%6 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0716%2 Oct →
dust212–160.0529%1 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0421%1 Oct →
cache10–130.0231%26 Sept →
ancient13–70.0617%24 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0516%23 Sept →
cache5–13-0.1116%7 Aug →
cache13–80.0525%4 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0016%28 Jul →
inferno11–130.0228%28 Jul →
mirage13–90.0231%27 Jul →
mirage13–100.0123%27 Jul →
ancient11–130.1329%26 Jul →
cache13–80.0330%26 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0048%23 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0234%22 Jul →
ancient13–90.0125%22 Jul →
mirage13–60.0727%20 Jul →
ancient13–90.0325%12 Jul →
mirage16–130.0332%11 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0621%10 Jul →
nuke8–130.0041%10 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0217%10 Jul →
mirage13–90.0236%9 Jul →
cache13–30.0135%7 Jul →
mirage13–80.0638%6 Jul →
mirage1–5-0.0160%6 Jul →
anubis13–60.0121%5 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0022%5 Jul →
nuke11–130.0229%29 Jun →
overpass13–100.0725%27 Jun →
mirage11–130.0121%7 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0017%1 Jun →
mirage13–30.0633%1 Jun →
ancient10–130.0225%31 May →
mirage13–80.1839%28 May →
ancient0–13-0.0130%19 May →
dust28–130.0428%19 May →
overpass5–13-0.0367%18 May →
cache11–130.0037%18 May →
inferno13–6-0.0132%17 May →
mirage13–60.0433%17 May →
mirage6–13-0.0138%16 May →
dust210–130.0328%15 May →
inferno13–60.0541%14 May →
ancient13–90.0220%14 May →
mirage13–60.0733%13 May →
cache12–120.0736%6 May →
cache9–130.0221%3 May →
cache13–90.1030%30 Apr →
inferno13–80.0517%30 Apr →
mirage13–20.1228%27 Apr →
mirage13–160.0516%27 Apr →
ancient13–50.0217%27 Apr →
ancient13–100.0830%27 Apr →
nuke9–130.0325%26 Apr →
nuke12–16-0.0431%25 Apr →
ancient13–60.0926%25 Apr →
inferno13–60.0718%24 Apr →
mirage13–100.0516%24 Apr →
mirage13–40.0724%23 Apr →
inferno13–50.1228%23 Apr →
inferno4–9-0.0432%22 Apr →
overpass5–13-0.0617%22 Apr →
inferno13–70.0133%22 Apr →
ancient13–30.1933%21 Apr →
anubis5–130.0632%21 Apr →
dust213–90.0635%21 Apr →
ancient10–130.0632%21 Apr →
ancient7–130.0423%20 Apr →
nuke13–80.0034%19 Apr →
inferno13–90.0931%19 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.1217%19 Apr →
anubis15–150.0514%18 Apr →
mirage13–90.1326%18 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0519%16 Apr →
anubis13–110.0723%16 Apr →
ancient13–80.0522%14 Apr →
mirage13–100.0825%13 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0629%12 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0235%11 Apr →
vertigo7–13-0.0131%11 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0135%11 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0536%10 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0328%8 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0342%8 Apr →
ancient11–130.0628%8 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0625%7 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0518%5 Apr →
ancient20–22-0.0432%4 Apr →
dust213–70.0619%3 Apr →
overpass13–60.0135%3 Apr →
mirage13–100.0644%1 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0618%1 Apr →
anubis5–80.0220%1 Apr →
mirage13–80.0015%1 Apr →
mirage13–70.0419%1 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0024%31 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.