LIL SNIPPY

LIL SNIPPY — CS2 Stats

VN76561198210871624[U:1:250605896]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,960Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,881Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating13,785Blue band · top ~34.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,785 +443 2 Aug – 30 Sept · 35 days played
13,13915,862peak 15,8622 Aug30 Sept
16,218Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,077 below peak (15,862)
  • -1,439 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,215 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches64——
Win rate47%——
K/D1.19——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.2%41.8%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy16.5%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.460.980.99above
Match win rate42.0%43.3%43.9%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLIL SNIPPYFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,785 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning63
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–43–8Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.4
Utility5.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time540ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 9 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · nuke, 4 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 29 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2212–1055%0.01
mirageB2210–1245%0.01
nukeS1510–567%0.03
anubisC135–838%-0.00
ancientD82–625%0.01
infernoC83–538%0.02
cache—44–0100%0.02
debris—41–325%0.02
poseidon—21–150%0.04
eldorado—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

216,395Lifetime kills
1.46K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players
9,440Matches
42.0%Match win rate
43.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
30,018MVPs
6,004Hours (in match)
7,153Bombs planted
1,683Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4762,978
AWP46,618
SSG 084,439
Tec-93,301
FAMAS2,739

Lifetime map wins

9,878inferno
8,796dust2
4,527nuke
1,673vertigo
1,383train
608cbble
391office
150safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
524msReaction time
57.8%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
9.64HE damage / grenade
9.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.026%30 Sept →
dust213–110.0220%29 Sept →
anubis13–70.0419%24 Sept →
mirage7–70.0619%24 Sept →
anubis0–2-0.050%24 Sept →
anubis13–80.0511%24 Sept →
anubis13–100.0916%24 Sept →
cache13–90.0624%24 Sept →
nuke10–130.0523%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.1424%23 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0214%23 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
ancient0–130.0019%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0823%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0333%21 Sept →
debris9–60.0627%21 Sept →
ancient5–130.0116%21 Sept →
dust24–13-0.107%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0615%20 Sept →
dust213–40.0717%20 Sept →
anubis7–130.0122%16 Sept →
ancient9–130.0136%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0432%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0222%15 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0138%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0126%15 Sept →
debris6–90.0421%15 Sept →
inferno8–80.0819%15 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0420%14 Sept →
mirage13–80.0126%14 Sept →
nuke16–140.0229%13 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0219%13 Sept →
ancient15–150.0027%13 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0128%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0318%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0514%13 Sept →
nuke6–130.0221%13 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0612%12 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0633%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.1537%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0722%7 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0222%6 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0220%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0315%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0324%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0418%3 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0715%2 Sept →
dust210–130.0316%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0110%1 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0523%1 Sept →
poseidon8–80.0617%1 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.095%1 Sept →
ancient10–00.0615%31 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0122%31 Aug →
eldorado2–90.0327%30 Aug →
poseidon9–70.0215%30 Aug →
debris5–9-0.039%30 Aug →
inferno13–40.0819%30 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0312%30 Aug →
ancient13–70.049%28 Aug →
dust215–150.0225%28 Aug →
dust213–110.0416%27 Aug →
mirage13–90.0123%27 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0023%26 Aug →
nuke13–30.0729%26 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0433%25 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0219%22 Aug →
dust29–130.019%22 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0314%17 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0219%17 Aug →
mirage14–160.0416%14 Aug →
inferno13–40.1419%14 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0215%14 Aug →
cache13–60.0014%13 Aug →
dust213–90.0125%13 Aug →
inferno13–70.0415%13 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0512%13 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0121%13 Aug →
dust213–50.0213%13 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0211%12 Aug →
mirage11–130.0413%11 Aug →
dust213–70.0712%10 Aug →
mirage13–100.0415%10 Aug →
dust213–100.0922%10 Aug →
mirage15–150.0016%10 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0219%9 Aug →
nuke13–60.1041%4 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0219%4 Aug →
dust210–130.0118%4 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0427%4 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0720%3 Aug →
nuke13–30.1022%3 Aug →
anubis13–110.0620%2 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0026%2 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0412%2 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0224%2 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0612%2 Aug →
eldorado9–60.057%2 Aug →
debris8–80.0126%2 Aug →
nuke13–50.1031%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.