ott0

ott0 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198209641733[U:1:249376005]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,168Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (38 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+28Tracked matches · now 2,168
+11.1ppWin rate · 48.1% → 59.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,706 -1,149 9 Feb – 20 Jun · 18 days played
22,70627,100peak 27,1009 Feb20 Jun
27,331Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-02-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGott0FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning58
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWWWWLLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility3.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time536ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–13 · mirage, 22 Apr →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · mirage, 20 Jun →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · cache, 17 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 10 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2815–1354%0.02
nukeC208–1240%0.01
infernoS128–467%0.03
dust2S128–467%-0.00
ancientA106–460%0.03
cacheS75–271%0.03
anubisD62–433%0.02
vertigo—20–20%0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.06
warden—10–10%0.05
alpine—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,279Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
85.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20752%1.0616.7
Ancient16352%1.2118.4
Nuke12652%1.1517.5
Dust212448%1.1018.3
Inferno4961%1.0115.0
Vertigo3661%1.2217.3
Anubis2756%1.2618.0
Train2361%1.2519.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
504msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3046 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1546% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0214%28 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0117%24 Sept →
mirage13–60.0530%24 Sept →
cache13–80.0331%17 Sept →
nuke4–130.0729%2 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0756%30 Aug →
mirage13–30.0435%30 Aug →
inferno15–150.0523%27 Aug →
mirage13–50.0112%27 Aug →
mirage13–30.0232%26 Aug →
cache13–40.1019%26 Aug →
nuke2–6-0.0729%26 Aug →
inferno13–30.0527%26 Aug →
mirage10–130.0138%25 Aug →
mirage13–90.0111%24 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0217%23 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0117%20 Aug →
dust25–130.0552%19 Aug →
mirage15–150.0124%19 Aug →
cache13–20.0412%17 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0421%28 Jul →
cache15–150.0125%28 Jul →
nuke13–30.1035%28 Jul →
cache7–130.0428%20 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0027%20 Jun →
inferno0–13-0.028%20 Jun →
cache5–00.039%20 Jun →
mirage0–6-0.0967%20 Jun →
dust20–4-0.0525%20 Jun →
mirage5–130.0137%20 Jun →
ancient2–80.0020%20 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0614%20 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0142%24 May →
inferno13–70.0830%23 May →
ancient13–110.0324%23 May →
nuke7–130.0227%19 May →
ancient13–30.1742%14 May →
dust213–100.0222%6 May →
overpass1–13-0.0624%22 Apr →
mirage9–130.1928%22 Apr →
nuke13–60.0421%18 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0914%12 Apr →
warden10–130.0522%11 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0123%11 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0125%11 Apr →
nuke13–110.0623%2 Apr →
nuke10–130.0419%2 Apr →
anubis16–140.0922%2 Apr →
mirage13–100.0125%31 Mar →
mirage3–130.0816%17 Mar →
alpine3–13-0.0622%17 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0216%14 Mar →
mirage13–60.0215%14 Mar →
mirage11–130.1122%6 Mar →
vertigo4–130.0123%6 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0130%6 Mar →
anubis1–13-0.0122%4 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0217%3 Mar →
anubis13–100.0318%3 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0427%3 Mar →
mirage16–130.0627%2 Mar →
nuke13–8-0.0238%27 Feb →
mirage0–5-0.050%24 Feb →
ancient19–170.0220%21 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0333%21 Feb →
dust213–60.0027%21 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0230%19 Feb →
inferno16–120.0826%19 Feb →
inferno16–130.0133%18 Feb →
dust20–13-0.0917%18 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0128%17 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0122%17 Feb →
inferno13–80.0322%17 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0023%16 Feb →
mirage13–90.1033%16 Feb →
dust216–14-0.0629%16 Feb →
inferno13–70.0633%15 Feb →
nuke13–30.0616%15 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0147%15 Feb →
inferno13–70.1034%15 Feb →
nuke11–130.0533%15 Feb →
vertigo7–130.0838%13 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0132%13 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0028%13 Feb →
mirage13–70.0622%13 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.0118%13 Feb →
anubis12–160.0326%12 Feb →
dust213–30.0836%12 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0123%12 Feb →
ancient13–110.0925%12 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0122%12 Feb →
nuke16–120.0218%11 Feb →
ancient13–40.0530%11 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0028%11 Feb →
nuke13–80.0829%11 Feb →
dust216–14-0.0216%10 Feb →
mirage13–30.0320%10 Feb →
dust213–80.0623%10 Feb →
mirage13–0-0.0221%10 Feb →
nuke11–130.0428%9 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.