ジョナ

ジョナ — CS2 Stats

US76561198208773633[U:1:248507905]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,578Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,469Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,482Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36693 of 251228 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,161 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,482 -957 24 May – 10 Oct · 13 days played
23,48224,892peak 24,89224 May10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,161 +0 28 Aug – 18 Sept · 4 observations
2,1612,161peak 2,16128 Aug18 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,161Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,161
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 339 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,410 below peak (24,892)
  • -1,144 over 30 days · declining
  • -21 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,518 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches15——
Win rate53%——
K/D0.82——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.7%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy15.3%13.3%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.161.071.09above
Match win rate50.1%46.9%48.4%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGジョナFACEITLevel 9 · 2,161 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,482 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,161csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning43
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateLWWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −7.1pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility5.2
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time581ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 21 Jul →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 1 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 8 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 8 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3619–1753%0.00
dust2B2110–1148%-0.01
ancientS107–370%-0.00
nukeC94–544%0.05
anubisS75–271%0.01
cacheA74–357%0.00
infernoD62–433%0.00
vertigo—22–0100%0.06
overpass—10–10%-0.08
debris—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

150,840Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
5,093Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
27,047MVPs
3,469Hours (in match)
2,856Bombs planted
7,630Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,147
AWP17,830
SG 5535,264
AUG3,169
Tec-92,573

Lifetime map wins

12,525inferno
9,872dust2
7,078nuke
5,332train
4,216vertigo
1,283cbble
89office
23lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

863Matches
55%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
82.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6245%1.0116.3
Ancient5461%1.0417.3
Dust24250%0.9915.1
Anubis3751%0.9814.5
Nuke2846%1.0216.2
Inferno1258%0.8414.6
Overpass933%1.0918.6
Train757%1.1016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
591msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
11.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.6559% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0724%10 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0019%10 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0820%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.1022%3 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0216%3 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0422%23 Sept →
overpass3–9-0.0810%19 Sept →
debris2–9-0.119%19 Sept →
inferno7–90.1322%19 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.250%19 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0221%17 Sept →
mirage13–70.0223%17 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.1233%10 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0312%10 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0312%10 Sept →
mirage6–130.0530%8 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.0925%8 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0826%8 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.1022%8 Sept →
ancient11–130.0230%4 Sept →
nuke9–50.2635%4 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0647%1 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0720%1 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0018%1 Sept →
mirage13–20.1230%1 Sept →
mirage10–130.0123%29 Aug →
cache13–90.0029%29 Aug →
dust214–160.000%29 Aug →
dust213–60.0619%29 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0223%26 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.076%26 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0215%26 Aug →
vertigo9–30.0527%26 Aug →
dust22–130.0433%19 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0312%19 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0918%16 Aug →
mirage19–160.0515%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.0226%15 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0518%9 Aug →
ancient19–160.0420%9 Aug →
ancient16–120.0923%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0618%9 Aug →
mirage10–130.0023%8 Aug →
cache13–80.0833%8 Aug →
mirage13–1-0.0329%8 Aug →
dust213–00.0230%8 Aug →
inferno10–130.0617%8 Aug →
mirage5–130.0028%8 Aug →
anubis11–130.0334%8 Aug →
mirage13–70.0527%8 Aug →
dust213–50.0516%8 Aug →
dust213–50.0630%8 Aug →
cache13–00.0526%8 Aug →
ancient13–80.0223%8 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0619%3 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0420%1 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0715%1 Aug →
anubis13–40.0025%1 Aug →
mirage13–60.0021%1 Aug →
nuke16–140.0220%1 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0116%25 Jul →
inferno9–30.1528%25 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0524%25 Jul →
mirage16–140.0627%23 Jul →
mirage6–130.0424%23 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0915%23 Jul →
nuke9–40.3019%21 Jul →
anubis13–60.1727%21 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0429%19 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0728%11 Jul →
mirage6–130.0217%11 Jul →
mirage11–20.0526%11 Jul →
vertigo13–70.0724%7 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0119%7 Jul →
mirage7–130.0317%4 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0031%4 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0731%4 Jul →
mirage8–130.0742%2 Jun →
mirage13–60.0432%2 Jun →
mirage13–40.0723%24 May →
mirage13–90.0324%24 May →
inferno13–40.0223%24 May →
mirage16–13-0.069%22 May →
ancient13–11-0.0131%10 May →
nuke7–13-0.0720%10 May →
ancient13–9-0.0015%10 May →
mirage11–13-0.0418%8 May →
nuke9–130.0724%8 May →
mirage13–110.0328%6 May →
dust213–20.0728%6 May →
dust22–13-0.0921%6 May →
dust210–13-0.0021%5 May →
dust213–40.0628%5 May →
dust213–9-0.0133%5 May →
dust213–100.0120%5 May →
dust28–5-0.0026%5 May →
cache11–13-0.0030%2 May →
nuke8–130.0044%2 May →
nuke13–9-0.0225%2 May →
dust21–13-0.0825%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.