Beix

Beix — CS2 Stats

LV76561198206068508[U:1:245802780]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,632Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,700Blue band · top ~40.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 911 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+191Premier CS Rating · 12,509 → 12,700

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,700 -2,299 31 Aug – 29 Oct · 30 days played
12,16317,716peak 17,71631 Aug29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 911 +0 31 Aug – 22 Sept · 5 observations
911911peak 91131 Aug22 Sept
17,716Peak Premier in tracked matches
911Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 911
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 140 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,016 below peak (17,716)
  • -2,300 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,300 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBeixFACEITLevel 9 · 911 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER12,700 · Blue bandPEAK ELO911csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning62
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +8.7pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time526ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 27 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 21 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 4–0 · rush_001, 3 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 74% over 19mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2911–1838%-0.00
infernoS1914–574%0.02
mirageD133–1023%-0.01
cacheC114–736%-0.02
ancientA85–363%0.02
anubisC73–443%-0.01
nukeC73–443%0.01
office—32–167%0.02
rush_001—22–0100%0.08
train—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

832Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
75.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220852%1.0915.1
Inferno14353%1.1214.9
Ancient14243%0.9814.9
Nuke13753%1.1215.8
Mirage10044%0.9814.4
Cache4556%1.0013.1
Anubis3845%0.9813.8
Overpass1145%0.8212.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
67.3%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
522msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
5.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0324%29 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0430%29 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0018%28 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0013%28 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.066%27 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0420%27 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0129%27 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.028%27 Oct →
inferno9–10.2935%27 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0213%26 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0210%26 Oct →
inferno7–130.0118%26 Oct →
cache13–70.0210%26 Oct →
nuke13–90.039%26 Oct →
ancient13–110.0111%25 Oct →
dust213–60.0510%25 Oct →
cache5–13-0.057%25 Oct →
inferno13–80.016%24 Oct →
ancient13–70.0612%24 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0416%23 Oct →
cache14–160.019%22 Oct →
inferno13–60.0523%21 Oct →
mirage11–130.0312%21 Oct →
nuke13–50.1213%21 Oct →
office2–9-0.0522%21 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0015%21 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0440%21 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0317%20 Oct →
inferno16–120.0415%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0323%19 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0413%19 Oct →
office13–11-0.0212%17 Oct →
train13–90.0319%17 Oct →
ancient10–130.0221%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0317%17 Oct →
dust213–6-0.049%15 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0817%15 Oct →
ancient16–120.0117%15 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0014%15 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0015%15 Oct →
dust210–130.0124%15 Oct →
cache9–130.0324%14 Oct →
inferno13–100.1017%14 Oct →
mirage9–130.0813%13 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0524%12 Oct →
mirage10–130.0314%12 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0119%12 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0616%11 Oct →
dust213–160.038%11 Oct →
inferno11–130.0514%10 Oct →
dust26–130.0828%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0015%10 Oct →
dust215–150.0213%10 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0518%10 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0111%9 Oct →
inferno8–130.0212%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.016%7 Oct →
dust213–80.027%5 Oct →
cache13–40.0413%5 Oct →
mirage13–110.008%5 Oct →
dust210–130.0423%5 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.079%5 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0417%4 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0126%4 Oct →
nuke7–130.0111%4 Oct →
ancient13–60.0219%4 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0417%3 Oct →
rush_0016–2-0.0513%3 Oct →
rush_0014–00.2227%3 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0622%2 Oct →
anubis13–70.0412%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0210%1 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0118%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0320%28 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0114%28 Sept →
anubis13–80.0122%28 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0321%28 Sept →
cache13–1-0.017%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%25 Sept →
dust210–130.0530%24 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0128%24 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0218%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0614%23 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0122%23 Sept →
dust29–130.0124%23 Sept →
dust27–130.0012%22 Sept →
dust213–160.0223%21 Sept →
inferno16–130.0325%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0128%21 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0927%21 Sept →
ancient13–70.0516%20 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0315%17 Sept →
dust210–130.0223%17 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.067%16 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0218%15 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0116%15 Sept →
office13–10.1119%14 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0428%14 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0324%14 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0421%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.