Kupsis Onetaps

Kupsis Onetaps — CS2 Stats

76561198748124383[U:1:787858655]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

258Tracked matches48%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,119Purple band · top ~23.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 1,107 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,119 +9,301 5 Apr – 21 Sept · 24 days played
6,10216,812peak 16,8125 Apr21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,107 +0 31 Aug – 14 Sept · 2 observations
1,1071,107peak 1,10731 Aug14 Sept
17,492Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,107Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-04-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,107
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 94 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 693 below peak (16,812)
  • +6,509 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,881 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKupsis OnetapsFACEITLevel 3 · 1,107 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,119 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,107csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning39
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility4.0
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning3.9
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time565ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 7–1 · dust2, 24 Apr →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 15 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 10 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · office, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3418–1653%-0.04
ancientB157–847%-0.04
nukeB136–746%-0.04
infernoA117–464%-0.04
anubisD71–614%-0.07
cacheS75–271%-0.03
mirageD62–433%-0.05
overpass—43–175%-0.07
train—21–150%-0.01
office—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
48%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
64.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21937%0.6811.1
Inferno1464%0.9313.4
Nuke1338%0.6712.0
Ancient1250%0.668.5
Anubis838%0.7612.0
Cache667%1.4512.5
Mirage333%0.7614.0
Vertigo1100%0.5211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.3%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
558msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
6.70HE damage / grenade
4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7535% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4913 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2106% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–16-0.008%21 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0112%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0616%21 Sept →
inferno9–2-0.0229%15 Sept →
train13–90.0019%15 Sept →
overpass9–5-0.1112%15 Sept →
office13–10.035%14 Sept →
dust29–13-0.026%14 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0413%10 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0221%10 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0716%10 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0515%10 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0211%10 Sept →
mirage13–20.006%10 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.069%10 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0116%8 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0226%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0823%2 Sept →
inferno16–140.0021%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0417%31 Aug →
dust24–13-0.069%30 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.107%23 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0415%23 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0121%23 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0614%23 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.058%17 Aug →
dust213–90.0320%17 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.069%17 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0410%16 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0415%9 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.068%9 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0811%23 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0717%23 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0413%22 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0718%22 Jul →
nuke13–110.0322%18 Jul →
cache13–100.0310%12 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0714%27 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0520%18 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.062%18 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0722%13 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.095%31 May →
nuke13–9-0.0016%31 May →
dust213–7-0.0112%31 May →
ancient7–13-0.054%31 May →
dust213–11-0.0014%31 May →
dust23–13-0.099%31 May →
inferno12–16-0.058%25 May →
dust28–13-0.069%25 May →
dust23–13-0.0812%25 May →
anubis5–13-0.1214%24 May →
overpass13–11-0.043%24 May →
dust29–130.0415%20 May →
inferno16–13-0.0712%19 May →
nuke13–11-0.0412%19 May →
ancient8–13-0.1011%19 May →
anubis9–13-0.0712%18 May →
nuke16–14-0.018%13 May →
ancient13–4-0.040%13 May →
anubis7–13-0.0318%12 May →
nuke15–15-0.069%11 May →
ancient13–5-0.043%11 May →
dust213–9-0.088%11 May →
dust211–13-0.0716%11 May →
ancient13–90.0119%10 May →
anubis13–9-0.058%10 May →
cache6–13-0.037%6 May →
dust213–7-0.069%5 May →
cache13–5-0.0812%5 May →
dust23–13-0.0918%5 May →
inferno8–13-0.0311%5 May →
ancient13–3-0.014%4 May →
mirage6–13-0.058%3 May →
ancient7–130.0116%3 May →
dust28–13-0.0414%30 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0817%30 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0516%30 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0411%30 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0313%29 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0615%29 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0516%29 Apr →
dust216–14-0.0811%29 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0720%29 Apr →
cache13–3-0.0219%29 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0520%28 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0516%27 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0418%27 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0515%25 Apr →
dust27–10.0615%24 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.096%24 Apr →
dust213–10-0.055%23 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.089%23 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.0210%13 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0211%13 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0411%13 Apr →
train4–13-0.0212%13 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0513%6 Apr →
ancient10–130.018%5 Apr →
dust213–50.0514%5 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0211%5 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.