Kupsis Onetaps

Kupsis Onetaps — CS2 Stats

76561198748124383[U:1:787858655]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

213Tracked matches48%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 Learning
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim38
Positioning40
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45523Last 10045%Win rateLLWLWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.8
Aggression5.1
Utility3.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.8
Positioning4.0
Utility3.1
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time590ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.06Best rating — dust2 7–1
133Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B34161847%-0.04
ancientB189950%-0.04
infernoC146843%-0.05
nukeB126650%-0.04
cacheS64267%-0.03
anubisD61517%-0.07
overpassC52340%-0.03
mirage41325%-0.07
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
43%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
64.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21331%0.6111.0
Ancient1060%0.698.5
Nuke838%0.7213.0
Inferno650%1.3014.0
Anubis520%0.7011.6
Mirage333%0.7614.0
Cache367%2.1913.3
Overpass1100%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.9%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
590msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
3.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.5624% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3866 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.2481% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.069%30 Aug
nuke6–13-0.107%23 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0415%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0121%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0614%23 Aug
nuke8–13-0.058%17 Aug
dust213–90.0320%17 Aug
nuke13–10-0.069%17 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0410%16 Aug
cache13–10-0.0415%9 Aug
anubis5–13-0.068%9 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0811%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.0717%23 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0413%22 Jul
dust213–5-0.0718%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0322%18 Jul
cache13–100.0310%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0714%27 Jun
dust213–10-0.0520%18 Jun
ancient7–13-0.062%18 Jun
cache9–13-0.0722%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.095%31 May
nuke13–9-0.0016%31 May
dust213–7-0.0112%31 May
ancient7–13-0.054%31 May
dust213–11-0.0014%31 May
dust23–13-0.099%31 May
inferno12–16-0.058%25 May
dust28–13-0.069%25 May
dust23–13-0.0812%25 May
anubis5–13-0.1214%24 May
overpass13–11-0.043%24 May
dust29–130.0415%20 May
inferno16–13-0.0712%19 May
nuke13–11-0.0412%19 May
ancient8–13-0.1011%19 May
anubis9–13-0.0712%18 May
nuke16–14-0.018%13 May
ancient13–4-0.040%13 May
anubis7–13-0.0318%12 May
nuke15–15-0.069%11 May
ancient13–5-0.043%11 May
dust213–9-0.088%11 May
dust211–13-0.0716%11 May
ancient13–90.0119%10 May
anubis13–9-0.058%10 May
cache6–13-0.037%6 May
dust213–7-0.069%5 May
cache13–5-0.0812%5 May
dust23–13-0.0918%5 May
inferno8–13-0.0311%5 May
ancient13–3-0.014%4 May
mirage6–13-0.058%3 May
ancient7–130.0116%3 May
dust28–13-0.0414%30 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0817%30 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0516%30 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0411%30 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0313%29 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0615%29 Apr
dust213–10-0.0516%29 Apr
dust216–14-0.0811%29 Apr
dust28–13-0.0720%29 Apr
cache13–3-0.0219%29 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0520%28 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0516%27 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0418%27 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0515%25 Apr
dust27–10.0615%24 Apr
ancient13–10-0.096%24 Apr
dust213–10-0.055%23 Apr
overpass13–11-0.089%23 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0210%13 Apr
dust213–6-0.0211%13 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0411%13 Apr
train4–13-0.0212%13 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0513%6 Apr
ancient10–130.018%5 Apr
dust213–50.0514%5 Apr
dust213–11-0.0211%5 Apr
mirage11–13-0.089%5 Apr
ancient6–13-0.134%2 Apr
dust213–3-0.0218%1 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0721%1 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0713%31 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0110%31 Mar
dust28–13-0.079%31 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0812%31 Mar
inferno9–7-0.0413%31 Mar
dust27–13-0.0212%31 Mar
dust213–16-0.0614%30 Mar
overpass15–150.0017%30 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0315%27 Mar
ancient13–60.0410%26 Mar
dust23–13-0.0827%26 Mar
dust211–13-0.044%25 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0311%25 Mar
dust25–13-0.099%25 Mar
dust211–13-0.038%25 Mar
inferno4–13-0.049%25 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →