formidable

formidable — CS2 Stats

RU76561198204821175[U:1:244555447]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,130Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,626 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,626 → 2,626
+1Tracked matches · now 2,130
0.0ppWin rate · 53.6% → 53.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 6 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,492 -2,154 22 Mar3 Jul · 13 days played
17,55522,409peak 22,40922 Mar3 Jul
22,409Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,626Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-03-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,626
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 374 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGformidableFACEITLevel 10 · 2,626 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,626csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44497Last 10044%Win rateLLLLWWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −85ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time576ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 28.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 25 Jun
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · inferno, 25 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · train, 14 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 24 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25111444%-0.00
mirageD1551033%0.00
ancientB147750%-0.00
infernoA116555%-0.01
cacheD102820%-0.02
poseidonC73443%0.09
anubisB63350%0.01
nukeA53260%-0.02
train21150%0.02
vertigo110100%-0.03
overpass110100%0.02
office1010%-0.03
stronghold110100%-0.03
sanctum1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,797Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
77.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage81055%1.0915.3
Ancient60758%1.1316.6
Anubis37051%1.1215.6
Dust236347%1.0714.9
Nuke8448%1.0414.4
Overpass8152%1.0416.3
Inferno7342%0.9313.8
Vertigo4233%0.9114.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
577msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
8.69HE damage / grenade
5.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7554% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno1–9-0.2060%7 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0420%28 Aug
dust210–130.0128%28 Aug
dust26–13-0.0423%27 Aug
dust216–130.0229%15 Aug
train13–10.0316%14 Aug
ancient12–120.0020%29 Jul
ancient5–130.0219%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0612%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0413%22 Jul
ancient7–130.0219%17 Jul
dust213–80.0220%16 Jul
ancient13–10.0317%11 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1238%9 Jul
cache3–13-0.0518%8 Jul
dust24–13-0.0713%8 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0933%8 Jul
mirage9–130.0126%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0431%3 Jul
nuke16–120.0725%2 Jul
ancient13–60.0026%2 Jul
dust213–8-0.0221%1 Jul
dust213–90.0315%29 Jun
dust20–13-0.0522%29 Jun
cache13–80.0321%26 Jun
cache12–12-0.0124%26 Jun
inferno0–4-0.25100%25 Jun
anubis0–4-0.000%25 Jun
nuke13–60.0423%25 Jun
inferno9–40.3432%25 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0332%22 Jun
ancient13–100.0517%22 Jun
anubis13–90.0519%22 Jun
inferno9–30.0037%16 Jun
dust211–13-0.0319%4 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0335%2 Jun
mirage13–70.0835%2 Jun
dust213–7-0.0321%2 Jun
ancient0–13-0.040%2 Jun
inferno9–60.0738%21 May
poseidon4–9-0.0211%21 May
cache8–13-0.0212%20 May
ancient6–130.0736%20 May
nuke1–13-0.0914%19 May
overpass13–80.0212%19 May
ancient13–110.0215%19 May
anubis5–130.0212%17 May
dust212–120.0030%17 May
dust28–130.0119%16 May
mirage5–13-0.0313%15 May
poseidon8–80.0723%14 May
inferno2–9-0.2017%14 May
dust213–70.0013%11 May
inferno13–3-0.0019%8 May
cache6–13-0.066%8 May
cache9–13-0.0330%7 May
cache13–7-0.0911%7 May
inferno9–70.0733%7 May
cache7–13-0.0220%6 May
mirage0–5-0.060%6 May
dust212–12-0.0226%3 May
cache3–13-0.0333%3 May
poseidon3–90.1417%29 Apr
cache7–130.0526%29 Apr
mirage14–160.0315%28 Apr
mirage13–110.0819%28 Apr
dust27–130.0331%20 Apr
dust212–12-0.0340%19 Apr
dust213–40.1324%19 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0729%18 Apr
poseidon9–10.2428%15 Apr
poseidon9–00.2671%15 Apr
poseidon9–7-0.0236%15 Apr
inferno9–70.1536%15 Apr
dust23–130.0212%8 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0235%8 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0724%6 Apr
dust211–130.0723%6 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0123%31 Mar
dust213–5-0.0121%30 Mar
dust213–11-0.0726%28 Mar
dust213–60.1126%25 Mar
mirage13–70.1027%25 Mar
dust29–13-0.0032%25 Mar
ancient5–13-0.1122%24 Mar
anubis13–00.000%24 Mar
anubis3–13-0.1233%23 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0118%22 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0429%22 Mar
inferno4–130.0126%22 Mar
anubis13–20.1029%21 Mar
train10–130.0127%21 Mar
dust27–13-0.0617%21 Mar
nuke12–12-0.0432%21 Mar
office0–13-0.0339%11 Mar
stronghold13–10-0.0331%11 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0121%9 Mar
mirage14–160.0512%9 Mar
sanctum2–9-0.1024%6 Mar
poseidon7–9-0.0547%6 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →