IdaSatan

IdaSatan — CS2 Stats

EE76561198972609419[U:1:1012343691]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,530Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+172Tracked matches · now 5,530
+2.6ppWin rate · 60.7% → 63.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,638 +1,670 15 Apr – 3 Jul · 5 days played
25,63027,638peak 27,63815 Apr3 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,738 +0 3 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
2,7382,738peak 2,7383 Sept20 Sept
27,638Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,738Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
66Days played since 2024-12-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIdaSatanFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,738csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning48
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63–32–5Last 10063%Win rateWLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time468ms−98ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 468ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 19 Feb →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · cache, 16 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · nuke, 15 Dec →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 30 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2114–767%-0.00
mirageS2014–670%0.01
anubisS1410–471%0.01
ancientA138–562%0.02
infernoB115–645%0.02
nukeA85–363%0.01
cacheS64–267%0.03
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
rush_001—10–10%0.06
sanctum—10–10%-0.10
alpine—10–10%0.03
warden—11–0100%-0.03
train—11–0100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,992Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
72.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage181651%0.9913.9
Anubis113952%1.0014.5
Ancient112854%1.0414.7
Dust279949%0.9513.6
Nuke19151%1.0014.2
Vertigo18543%0.9213.8
Inferno18250%1.0614.6
Overpass10348%0.9113.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
486msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
4.51HE damage / grenade
8.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0223%14 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0417%13 Oct →
rush_0016–80.0618%9 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0116%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0722%7 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0412%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0413%30 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0526%30 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0321%29 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0214%24 Sept →
mirage9–130.0522%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0114%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.0520%21 Sept →
anubis9–130.0212%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.0419%12 Sept →
mirage13–110.0426%9 Sept →
ancient13–90.0112%19 Aug →
ancient16–130.0818%16 Aug →
mirage9–130.0014%26 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0115%22 Jul →
mirage13–50.1022%21 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0315%17 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0720%10 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0324%10 Jul →
cache3–130.0121%8 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0119%8 Jul →
mirage3–130.0124%8 Jul →
dust213–110.0021%3 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0415%30 Jun →
mirage13–00.000%30 Jun →
dust213–50.0428%30 Jun →
anubis0–4-0.030%25 Jun →
nuke13–60.005%25 Jun →
vertigo13–110.0122%22 Jun →
ancient13–100.0616%22 Jun →
dust222–190.0318%10 Jun →
anubis13–100.0321%5 Jun →
ancient8–130.1220%1 Jun →
mirage12–120.0917%1 Jun →
inferno9–60.1214%20 May →
dust215–150.0020%18 May →
cache13–20.0948%16 May →
dust28–13-0.0219%16 May →
cache13–00.0710%3 May →
nuke7–13-0.0330%22 Apr →
inferno13–80.0622%16 Apr →
dust213–50.0125%15 Apr →
nuke13–80.0418%15 Apr →
ancient13–60.0218%8 Apr →
inferno9–130.0320%8 Apr →
dust213–20.0218%8 Apr →
anubis13–3-0.0323%5 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0512%5 Apr →
dust213–10.0429%5 Apr →
inferno13–70.0524%4 Apr →
mirage13–110.0023%4 Apr →
mirage13–3-0.0214%24 Mar →
dust212–120.0028%21 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0615%21 Mar →
mirage13–80.0318%12 Mar →
sanctum1–9-0.1010%12 Mar →
dust213–4-0.0014%12 Mar →
ancient5–130.0917%11 Mar →
dust25–130.0227%11 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0413%4 Mar →
anubis13–11-0.029%2 Mar →
alpine12–120.0323%28 Feb →
mirage13–110.0324%28 Feb →
warden13–6-0.0312%26 Feb →
inferno12–120.0628%26 Feb →
anubis13–100.0610%24 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0610%20 Feb →
dust213–40.0622%20 Feb →
ancient13–20.0612%20 Feb →
inferno9–130.0136%20 Feb →
anubis13–30.0414%20 Feb →
inferno13–5-0.029%19 Feb →
nuke13–90.1221%19 Feb →
anubis13–20.1420%19 Feb →
vertigo7–13-0.0626%11 Feb →
dust213–7-0.049%11 Feb →
inferno6–10.0839%10 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0415%1 Oct →
dust213–50.0122%21 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0327%17 Sept →
ancient11–130.0121%10 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0417%1 Aug →
anubis13–70.0318%6 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0314%13 Jun →
dust213–30.0410%17 May →
ancient10–13-0.0321%1 May →
mirage13–8-0.0227%5 Jan →
train13–8-0.0615%4 Jan →
mirage13–1-0.0317%4 Jan →
dust23–13-0.0728%3 Jan →
mirage13–90.0421%3 Jan →
ancient13–80.0121%2 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0410%29 Dec →
anubis13–40.0626%25 Dec →
nuke9–13-0.0421%15 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.