Fuffy

Fuffy — CS2 Stats

US76561198203197801[U:1:242932073]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,676Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,879Top 25% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23577 of 251575 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,759 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+236Premier CS Rating · 24,643 → 24,879

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,879 +4,389 23 Jun – 14 Oct · 26 days played
18,48724,879peak 24,87923 Jun14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,759 +0 1 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
1,7591,759peak 1,7591 Sept18 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,759Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,759
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 242 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,879
  • +5,461 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 121 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFuffyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,759 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,879 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,759csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning63
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60–35–5Last 10060%Win rateWWLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility7.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.3
Utility7.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time621ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−6.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 12 Oct →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 21 Sept →
461msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 14 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 5ancientWeakest map · 50% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2010–1050%0.03
mirageB1910–953%0.02
nukeS139–469%0.01
anubisB137–654%0.01
cacheS119–282%-0.01
dust2S64–267%0.02
officeA53–260%0.02
infernoS55–0100%0.06
shelter—22–0100%0.08
train—20–20%0.07
vertigo—20–20%0.03
overpass—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,165Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9060%1.1516.3
Anubis7951%1.1314.8
Mirage6540%1.0414.7
Inferno4243%1.0915.1
Nuke3847%1.0315.1
Overpass1844%1.0714.2
Vertigo1765%1.0414.8
Dust21662%0.9014.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
87.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
632msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
10.93HE damage / grenade
20.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5132% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter13–110.0530%14 Oct →
office13–90.0217%14 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0220%14 Oct →
cache13–100.0117%14 Oct →
ancient13–40.1121%14 Oct →
nuke13–30.0520%13 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0318%13 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.057%13 Oct →
dust216–140.0113%13 Oct →
dust213–70.0721%12 Oct →
ancient2–130.0122%12 Oct →
ancient13–20.1530%12 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0129%12 Oct →
anubis13–60.0121%9 Oct →
dust213–50.0320%9 Oct →
inferno13–40.0820%9 Oct →
nuke11–130.0223%8 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0124%7 Oct →
train12–120.0820%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0617%6 Oct →
mirage15–150.0421%6 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0112%6 Oct →
anubis13–90.0619%5 Oct →
office8–30.0632%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0511%2 Oct →
cache13–8-0.039%2 Oct →
cache13–5-0.028%2 Oct →
cache13–60.0021%1 Oct →
office11–130.0524%29 Sept →
nuke12–2-0.0119%28 Sept →
mirage13–70.0018%28 Sept →
inferno13–110.0116%28 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0215%25 Sept →
anubis13–50.0935%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.0922%23 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0512%23 Sept →
nuke16–130.0113%23 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0614%22 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0354%21 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0232%21 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0318%20 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0421%19 Sept →
train12–120.0524%18 Sept →
office8–13-0.086%18 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0225%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0416%17 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0218%16 Sept →
mirage6–130.0827%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0032%15 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0119%14 Sept →
mirage13–20.0726%14 Sept →
inferno13–40.0427%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.0421%10 Sept →
mirage9–130.0423%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0219%9 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0022%8 Sept →
office13–100.0322%8 Sept →
ancient13–50.0429%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0225%5 Sept →
ancient13–10.1018%5 Sept →
inferno13–00.1332%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0617%5 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.1317%5 Sept →
ancient15–150.0416%3 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0011%2 Sept →
nuke13–60.0229%2 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0111%10 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0433%10 Aug →
ancient9–130.0215%7 Aug →
vertigo11–130.0626%6 Aug →
cache13–110.0219%6 Aug →
mirage11–130.0729%6 Aug →
anubis25–21-0.0223%3 Aug →
ancient13–80.1036%3 Aug →
shelter13–90.1031%18 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0020%18 Jul →
mirage13–50.0226%16 Jul →
dust25–130.0217%16 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0529%15 Jul →
nuke13–30.0830%14 Jul →
ancient13–90.1122%14 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0536%13 Jul →
ancient10–130.0033%13 Jul →
cache10–13-0.1126%11 Jul →
cache13–70.0425%11 Jul →
anubis3–130.0437%11 Jul →
mirage13–70.0728%11 Jul →
nuke13–70.0833%10 Jul →
anubis7–130.039%10 Jul →
mirage5–130.0417%10 Jul →
dust213–40.0226%9 Jul →
cache13–70.0410%7 Jul →
inferno13–50.0627%7 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0029%1 Jul →
mirage13–90.0519%29 Jun →
ancient13–100.0226%29 Jun →
overpass8–130.0325%29 Jun →
overpass16–130.0626%26 Jun →
anubis13–50.0531%25 Jun →
nuke13–100.0022%23 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.