tnk

tnk — CS2 Stats

VN76561198203108347[U:1:242842619]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,356Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,219Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,427Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34069 of 220527 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,356 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 1 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,427 +1,932 1 Jun14 Sept · 31 days played
20,76624,173peak 24,1731 Jun14 Sept
24,173Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-06-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 746 below peak (24,173)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,044 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,573 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate22.1%44.9%45.8%23.7% short
Shot accuracy16.6%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.041.050.09 short
Match win rate43.7%45.3%45.7%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtnkFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,427 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.6

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time627ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 2 Jul
54%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · anubis, 13 Jun
328msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · mirage, 3 Jul
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 7overpassWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA41231856%-0.02
cacheB137654%-0.03
dust2A116555%-0.01
ancientC104640%-0.01
overpassC83538%-0.02
nukeA74357%-0.00
anubisB63350%0.01
inferno41325%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

340,987Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
6,950Matches
43.7%Match win rate
22.1%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
18,617MVPs
3,219Hours (in match)
6,332Bombs planted
2,172Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,471
AWP29,774
P2504,524
SSG 082,736
Knife2,015
Tec-91,872

Lifetime map wins

6,670inferno
6,159dust2
3,196cbble
2,138nuke
2,015train
1,827vertigo
126office
73lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

467Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
88.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
60%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3100%1.0317.0
Ancient2100%1.2820.5
Inferno1100%1.3818.0
Nuke10%0.8121.0
Overpass1100%1.8815.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
631msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
4.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.405% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.1020%15 Aug
dust213–50.0014%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0123%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0419%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0814%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.1019%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0527%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0320%19 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0617%19 Jul
ancient13–50.0322%18 Jul
cache8–11-0.0843%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0119%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0029%16 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0126%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0620%13 Jul
cache13–2-0.0124%13 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0130%13 Jul
cache13–7-0.0120%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0216%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0428%12 Jul
cache13–80.0327%12 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0015%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0136%11 Jul
cache16–14-0.0133%11 Jul
cache13–100.0222%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.1126%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.0127%10 Jul
mirage13–70.0531%9 Jul
cache9–13-0.0331%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0630%9 Jul
mirage1–10-0.0429%8 Jul
cache8–13-0.0331%7 Jul
cache13–7-0.0628%7 Jul
ancient10–13-0.1113%6 Jul
inferno7–130.0132%6 Jul
mirage13–110.0331%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0021%6 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0140%5 Jul
anubis13–90.0536%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0836%5 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0239%5 Jul
overpass6–130.0139%5 Jul
dust213–6-0.0239%5 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0735%5 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0521%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0840%4 Jul
mirage1–5-0.090%3 Jul
mirage13–10.0129%3 Jul
nuke13–110.0024%3 Jul
ancient13–40.1023%2 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0320%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0021%30 Jun
dust213–70.0235%28 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0223%28 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0416%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0532%28 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0217%28 Jun
mirage13–100.0123%27 Jun
dust211–13-0.0326%27 Jun
dust213–60.0628%27 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0329%27 Jun
nuke8–130.0733%26 Jun
overpass7–13-0.058%21 Jun
dust213–9-0.0330%21 Jun
inferno13–90.0722%21 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0513%21 Jun
overpass16–13-0.0121%21 Jun
cache11–13-0.0018%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0621%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0117%19 Jun
nuke16–140.0319%14 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0533%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0028%14 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0826%14 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0531%14 Jun
mirage13–3-0.028%13 Jun
overpass4–13-0.044%13 Jun
anubis15–150.0754%13 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0210%13 Jun
mirage13–110.0424%13 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0322%12 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0119%12 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0334%12 Jun
dust27–13-0.0229%11 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0140%10 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0321%9 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0022%8 Jun
mirage13–60.0433%8 Jun
dust213–60.0828%8 Jun
overpass13–2-0.0833%8 Jun
mirage14–160.0029%7 Jun
anubis13–60.0118%7 Jun
mirage13–50.0631%7 Jun
overpass11–130.0330%6 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0036%6 Jun
mirage13–50.0231%6 Jun
mirage8–130.0226%6 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0120%6 Jun
overpass13–160.0021%1 Jun
mirage13–30.0031%1 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →