𝓛𝑒𝒽𝒯 — CS2 Stats

EE76561198202570843[U:1:242305115]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,632Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

7,841Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating24,585Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#24786 of 232878 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,585 → 24,585

0Faceit ELO · 1,985 → 1,985

+41Tracked matches · now 3,632

−1.7ppWin rate · 48.1% → 46.4%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 19 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,585 +0 22 Aug – 7 Sept · 2 days played

24,585Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,985Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

31Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,985
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 16 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07
Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 24,585
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 415 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,987), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Pink band median	Red band median	vs Red band
Headshot rate	50.2%	46.9%	49.2%	above
Shot accuracy	9.7%	13.0%	13.4%	3.7% short
Kill/death ratio	0.94	1.08	1.12	0.18 short
Match win rate	48.7%	46.7%	48.5%	meets

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning73

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–51–7Last 10042%Win rateLWWLWWTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.0pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

9–9–2 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.0

Utility7.5

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch2.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning7.3

Utility7.5

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels6.2

Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time517ms−25ms

first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%−6.4%

first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · overpass, 12 Sept →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · anubis, 22 Aug →

359msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · cache, 2 Sept →

13–2Biggest win · overpass, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 25% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	D	28	9–19	32%	-0.00
nuke	B	25	12–13	48%	-0.01
anubis	D	16	4–12	25%	-0.00
overpass	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
fachwerk	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
ancient	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.01
vertigo	—	4	1–3	25%	0.00
boulder	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

166,071Lifetime kills

0.94K/D

9,049Matches

48.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band

50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band

9.7%Shot accuracy

20,463MVPs

4,089Hours (in match)

18,294Bombs planted

2,837Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,549

M4A4 / M4A1-S25,616

Desert Eagle17,675

AWP17,199

P2000 / USP-S8,660

Glock-186,025

MP94,643

MAC-103,091

FAMAS2,762

HE Grenade2,500

Lifetime map wins

12,095inferno

11,818nuke

5,935dust2

5,552train

5,518vertigo

3,092cbble

72lake

45office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

928Matches

53%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

73.8ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	75	56%	0.95	13.9
Anubis	53	51%	1.20	15.8
Ancient	44	52%	0.97	14.6
Inferno	34	41%	1.02	16.4
Nuke	26	62%	1.01	13.3
Vertigo	17	71%	0.94	15.8
Overpass	17	65%	1.30	15.2
Dust2	16	56%	0.83	13.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

77.6%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

506msReaction time

59.5%T opening success

50.1%CT opening success

0.68Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

10.35HE damage / grenade

13.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	10–13	0.02	23%	19 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.03	19%	18 Sept →
overpass	13–9	0.05	23%	18 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.02	31%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	25%	18 Sept →
fachwerk	13–3	0.04	33%	17 Sept →
cache	12–12	-0.01	30%	17 Sept →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	19%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–4	0.03	12%	16 Sept →
overpass	13–7	0.11	31%	16 Sept →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	13%	16 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.01	20%	16 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.03	17%	15 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.07	18%	15 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.01	17%	14 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.09	30%	14 Sept →
overpass	5–13	-0.06	25%	14 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.02	11%	13 Sept →
nuke	12–12	0.00	18%	13 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	18%	13 Sept →
boulder	2–13	-0.07	29%	12 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	18%	12 Sept →
overpass	13–2	0.11	24%	12 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.02	22%	12 Sept →
train	13–5	0.01	24%	12 Sept →
cache	4–0	0.04	20%	12 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	21%	11 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.05	16%	11 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	19%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.08	29%	11 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.00	13%	11 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	19%	10 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	21%	10 Sept →
vertigo	4–13	0.06	21%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.03	47%	9 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	19%	9 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	30%	9 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.04	29%	8 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	33%	8 Sept →
overpass	11–13	-0.00	27%	7 Sept →
cache	13–5	-0.03	27%	7 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	20%	6 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.02	33%	6 Sept →
fachwerk	10–13	-0.03	39%	5 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	-0.04	41%	5 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.09	40%	5 Sept →
boulder	13–9	0.05	28%	5 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	42%	5 Sept →
train	6–13	0.04	22%	4 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.01	32%	4 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.08	28%	3 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	22%	3 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.03	23%	3 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	13%	3 Sept →
overpass	12–12	-0.06	31%	2 Sept →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	28%	2 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.04	22%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.04	20%	2 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.03	10%	2 Sept →
nuke	9–13	0.00	16%	2 Sept →
fachwerk	13–3	0.07	34%	2 Sept →
cache	5–13	0.05	24%	1 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	15%	1 Sept →
cache	12–12	0.06	25%	31 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	26%	31 Aug →
overpass	13–5	-0.04	26%	30 Aug →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.00	20%	30 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	30%	30 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.05	17%	29 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.03	30%	29 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.08	24%	28 Aug →
overpass	13–10	0.00	19%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–1	-0.04	20%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	23%	28 Aug →
boulder	9–13	0.01	22%	27 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	25%	27 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	34%	27 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.01	21%	26 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.02	18%	26 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	14%	26 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	43%	25 Aug →
cache	6–3	-0.01	25%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	23%	23 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	30%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	19%	22 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.04	36%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	24%	22 Aug →
anubis	2–13	0.02	50%	22 Aug →
fachwerk	13–10	-0.02	33%	22 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	23%	21 Aug →
overpass	13–3	0.02	37%	21 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.05	33%	21 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.04	29%	21 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	33%	20 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.01	37%	20 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.01	21%	20 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	45%	20 Aug →
overpass	8–13	-0.01	27%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	33%	19 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.01	20%	19 Aug →