miteww

miteww — CS2 Stats

BG76561198201097994[U:1:240832266]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,389Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,285Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,695 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,695 → 3,695
+21Tracked matches · now 2,389
−3.5ppWin rate · 37.9% → 34.5%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,858 -1,347 28 Dec – 16 May · 9 days played
25,60629,205peak 29,20528 Dec16 May
Faceit ELO: 3,695 +0 28 Aug – 22 Sept · 6 observations
3,6953,695peak 3,69528 Aug22 Sept
29,205Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,695Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2025-11-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,695
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 305 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches33——
Win rate61%——
K/D1.03——
Headshot %54%——

Measured 16 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,846), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate51.1%50.9%
Shot accuracy14.0%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.241.09
Match win rate54.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmitewwFACEITLevel 10 · 3,695 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,695csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning53
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time550ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 23 Mar →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 6 Jul →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 19 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 15 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2814–1450%0.06
dust2B209–1145%0.05
infernoA1912–763%0.06
ancientC167–944%0.04
anubisD71–614%-0.00
overpassS64–267%0.02
train—21–150%0.02
office—11–0100%0.11
nuke—11–0100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

244,324Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
8,342Matches
54.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players
51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
32,372MVPs
5,106Hours (in match)
10,981Bombs planted
3,971Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4787,570
AWP32,934
Knife6,051
SG 5535,624
P2504,091

Lifetime map wins

18,898inferno
12,588dust2
3,769train
3,403cbble
2,025nuke
953vertigo
696office
211safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,835Matches
57%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
80.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage38157%1.3116.2
Ancient33356%1.2215.8
Dust215658%1.3115.3
Inferno15567%1.3316.3
Anubis14157%1.3415.6
Overpass5263%1.3515.9
Cache4367%1.3314.7
Nuke2955%1.2614.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
552msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
7.57HE damage / grenade
12.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5967% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0113%11 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0132%8 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0317%2 Sept →
ancient7–130.0513%19 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0318%18 Aug →
mirage9–130.0121%7 Aug →
mirage14–160.0512%26 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.02100%6 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0311%25 Jun →
dust213–100.0322%21 Jun →
inferno13–80.0218%17 Jun →
dust214–16-0.0122%16 Jun →
anubis13–1-0.0114%7 Jun →
ancient7–130.0527%5 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0228%5 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0533%2 Jun →
dust211–130.0112%2 Jun →
ancient1–13-0.0333%30 May →
ancient13–40.0010%16 May →
mirage13–50.1332%15 May →
overpass8–13-0.058%14 May →
inferno13–70.0725%14 May →
mirage7–13-0.0042%13 May →
dust213–60.2135%7 May →
dust213–50.0322%29 Apr →
dust214–160.0622%29 Apr →
mirage13–70.1029%29 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0217%22 Apr →
inferno15–150.0815%22 Apr →
ancient3–130.0731%21 Apr →
inferno13–20.1824%11 Apr →
dust213–30.1218%11 Apr →
anubis12–120.1038%8 Apr →
inferno13–20.1720%6 Apr →
mirage14–160.0926%6 Apr →
dust26–130.0141%6 Apr →
mirage13–160.0917%5 Apr →
ancient13–70.2618%1 Apr →
dust213–110.0235%1 Apr →
dust28–130.0917%28 Mar →
mirage13–110.0619%28 Mar →
mirage13–60.1830%24 Mar →
mirage16–130.0817%24 Mar →
ancient16–130.1228%23 Mar →
mirage13–30.2823%23 Mar →
dust210–130.1127%23 Mar →
mirage13–40.1031%21 Mar →
dust26–130.0535%19 Mar →
mirage13–50.2225%18 Mar →
office13–110.1123%18 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0120%11 Mar →
inferno13–100.0230%11 Mar →
mirage11–130.0519%11 Mar →
dust216–130.0325%10 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0322%10 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0118%10 Mar →
ancient13–60.0125%27 Feb →
ancient4–130.0320%21 Feb →
dust29–130.0016%15 Feb →
overpass13–00.0717%15 Feb →
mirage13–70.0218%9 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0233%9 Feb →
mirage9–130.0933%9 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0516%8 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0112%7 Feb →
mirage12–160.0329%1 Feb →
mirage16–120.0016%1 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0027%29 Jan →
mirage13–80.0033%27 Jan →
anubis16–190.0117%23 Jan →
overpass13–110.0134%23 Jan →
dust28–130.0927%23 Jan →
dust213–60.1529%18 Jan →
overpass13–30.1030%18 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0219%18 Jan →
train13–50.0017%17 Jan →
dust213–9-0.0118%17 Jan →
anubis1–13-0.1014%17 Jan →
inferno9–130.0340%16 Jan →
mirage16–140.0323%15 Jan →
anubis0–13-0.0430%13 Jan →
ancient13–80.0115%10 Jan →
inferno13–10.1629%28 Dec →
ancient13–40.0828%28 Dec →
mirage13–50.0024%28 Dec →
overpass13–60.0222%22 Dec →
ancient10–10.1136%18 Dec →
mirage13–20.1937%18 Dec →
train6–130.0430%17 Dec →
mirage4–13-0.0435%14 Dec →
anubis3–90.0338%10 Dec →
mirage7–130.0131%10 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0121%5 Dec →
inferno9–70.0726%21 Nov →
inferno3–9-0.1016%21 Nov →
nuke9–70.1918%21 Nov →
inferno9–60.2132%21 Nov →
inferno9–70.0842%21 Nov →
inferno9–30.2021%21 Nov →
inferno8–80.0619%21 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.