Dralen

Dralen — CS2 Stats

76561198200377013[U:1:240111285]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

998Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,793Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 998 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 18 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,979 -8,486 18 Oct19 Jun · 26 days played
12,01721,465peak 21,46518 Oct19 Jun
21,465Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2025-10-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 8 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.8%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy14.2%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.931.021.040.11 short
Match win rate44.6%44.7%45.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDralenFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning40
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41563Last 10041%Win rateTWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 731ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility6.4
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.0
Utility6.4
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time615ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 11–1 · ancient, 5 Mar
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · ancient, 11 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 22 Oct
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 54% over 13mirageWeakest map · 33% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD33112233%-0.01
dust2D2171433%0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
ancientB137654%-0.00
nukeD62433%-0.01
anubis43175%-0.02
overpass32167%-0.03
cache21150%0.01
vertigo1010%0.05
train1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,348Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
4,505Matches
44.6%Match win rate
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,083MVPs
1,793Hours (in match)
3,481Bombs planted
997Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,691
AWP8,542
P902,747
SSG 082,088
FAMAS1,939
MP71,864

Lifetime map wins

10,930dust2
8,525inferno
1,422nuke
689vertigo
481cbble
358train
336office
162italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

216Matches
51%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
71.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2952%0.7712.2
Inferno967%0.7012.7
Anubis850%0.8713.0
Ancient825%0.7513.8
Vertigo743%0.5810.7
Dust2580%1.0418.2
Nuke250%0.946.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
615msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
12.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.993% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0923%11 Aug
ancient13–0-0.0138%11 Aug
cache13–11-0.0223%22 Jul
inferno3–13-0.1233%19 Jun
dust22–13-0.0128%19 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0420%19 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0915%1 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0517%31 May
inferno2–13-0.0819%31 May
inferno11–30.0514%31 May
inferno13–60.0216%21 May
nuke9–130.0332%16 May
overpass13–110.0515%11 May
nuke13–100.0921%10 May
mirage6–130.0213%10 May
mirage13–40.1029%10 May
mirage9–13-0.0413%10 May
mirage6–100.0115%10 May
nuke9–13-0.0114%10 May
ancient13–50.0411%10 May
dust213–70.0211%10 May
ancient13–40.0323%10 May
mirage16–140.0423%10 May
inferno0–5-0.100%9 May
dust25–8-0.0138%9 May
ancient10–130.0319%9 May
mirage10–13-0.0715%9 May
ancient9–130.0329%9 May
mirage13–10-0.0210%8 May
mirage0–13-0.0121%8 May
dust29–130.0131%7 May
dust29–130.0616%7 May
dust213–110.0125%7 May
mirage16–140.0215%6 May
cache9–130.0426%6 May
dust213–80.0414%16 Apr
mirage15–150.0023%16 Apr
dust211–130.0213%9 Apr
mirage11–130.0223%9 Apr
vertigo12–120.0519%5 Apr
dust213–80.0318%5 Apr
anubis13–110.0123%5 Apr
dust26–130.0525%29 Mar
dust211–13-0.0121%29 Mar
mirage13–110.1123%29 Mar
inferno7–130.0723%29 Mar
dust24–13-0.0617%29 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0420%29 Mar
inferno13–50.1010%29 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0225%27 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0423%25 Mar
mirage13–90.0420%25 Mar
dust29–13-0.0417%25 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0817%16 Mar
ancient13–60.0423%16 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0217%15 Mar
dust213–90.0712%15 Mar
inferno13–40.0728%15 Mar
dust23–13-0.0715%15 Mar
dust211–130.0336%15 Mar
ancient11–10.1318%5 Mar
dust213–16-0.0431%5 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0724%18 Feb
mirage9–13-0.053%18 Feb
dust213–30.0521%18 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0320%18 Feb
inferno1–13-0.0633%12 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0923%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0216%11 Feb
dust216–140.0219%11 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0520%11 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0924%2 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0511%2 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0526%2 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0623%31 Jan
inferno13–60.0334%31 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0421%31 Jan
mirage13–80.0318%31 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0431%31 Jan
dust27–13-0.0817%28 Jan
mirage4–12-0.0219%28 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0331%27 Jan
mirage13–80.0819%27 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0827%27 Jan
anubis13–70.0310%27 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0824%10 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0119%10 Jan
inferno13–50.0418%9 Jan
inferno13–110.0316%9 Jan
dust211–130.0121%13 Nov
train0–13-0.0911%9 Nov
mirage3–13-0.0219%30 Oct
overpass1–13-0.1121%30 Oct
mirage5–13-0.0126%22 Oct
inferno3–13-0.0532%22 Oct
ancient13–6-0.0018%20 Oct
mirage9–13-0.0621%20 Oct
overpass13–8-0.0432%20 Oct
inferno12–16-0.0523%19 Oct
mirage5–0-0.060%18 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →