snown

snown — CS2 Stats

DE76561198198403287[U:1:238137559]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

849Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,777Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,109Top 10% of 203,724 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19454 of 251095 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,109 +6,137 29 Feb – 6 Oct · 27 days played
16,65925,109peak 25,10929 Feb6 Oct
25,109Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2024-02-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,109
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,891 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate53.7%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy21.8%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.851.061.070.22 short
Match win rate40.2%46.3%46.9%6.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnownFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,109 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWTWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.8

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time597ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 31 May →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · mirage, 4 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · overpass, 8 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 31 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 17ancientWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3213–1941%0.01
infernoS1712–571%0.03
nukeB157–847%0.01
ancientD143–1121%-0.02
dust2A95–456%0.02
anubisB63–350%0.02
cache—42–250%0.00
overpass—33–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

165,367Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
5,241Matches
40.2%Match win rate
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
21.8%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 8 players
13,017MVPs
11,592Hours (in match)
4,137Bombs planted
1,476Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4759,081
AWP15,579
SG 5532,994
P2502,950
FAMAS2,569

Lifetime map wins

10,438inferno
5,518dust2
1,116train
934nuke
770vertigo
503cbble
47safehouse
37italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,416Matches
51%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
—ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
42.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
603msReaction time
50.2%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 28.6215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0226%6 Oct →
nuke15–150.1025%5 Oct →
nuke13–60.0718%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0514%5 Oct →
ancient6–130.0024%5 Oct →
mirage13–160.1226%1 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0019%1 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0514%1 Oct →
anubis13–60.0225%28 Sept →
inferno7–130.0830%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0222%28 Sept →
dust213–110.0832%28 Sept →
ancient1–12-0.0929%26 Sept →
inferno13–110.0110%26 Sept →
nuke13–30.0217%26 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0530%25 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0626%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.0717%25 Sept →
cache6–130.0519%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0235%25 Sept →
dust213–80.0323%25 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0123%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.0724%16 Aug →
inferno13–40.0518%27 Jul →
anubis9–130.039%14 Jun →
mirage13–160.1033%14 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0016%13 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0227%13 Jun →
overpass13–110.0232%6 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0117%6 Jun →
mirage11–130.1619%31 May →
ancient13–90.0620%31 May →
nuke13–60.0545%31 May →
mirage13–40.0826%3 May →
nuke14–160.0129%2 May →
mirage3–13-0.0535%1 May →
nuke13–9-0.0136%26 Apr →
anubis13–80.1414%26 Apr →
nuke7–90.0324%26 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0656%26 Apr →
nuke13–60.0730%18 Apr →
mirage13–30.0940%18 Apr →
inferno16–130.0413%16 Apr →
inferno13–70.1219%3 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0117%25 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0026%15 Mar →
ancient1–13-0.0425%20 Nov →
mirage15–150.0022%19 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0114%19 Nov →
overpass13–110.0220%13 Nov →
ancient16–12-0.0520%12 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0219%12 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0613%8 Nov →
overpass2–0-0.040%8 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0022%8 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0110%5 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0114%5 Nov →
dust27–130.0318%22 Oct →
mirage16–140.0225%22 Oct →
ancient13–110.0417%22 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0314%19 Oct →
inferno13–70.0322%19 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0019%19 Oct →
mirage16–130.0115%19 Oct →
inferno13–70.0121%18 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0326%18 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0322%11 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0112%10 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0023%10 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0121%7 Aug →
mirage8–130.0324%7 Aug →
dust213–110.0227%6 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0124%6 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0732%6 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0217%5 Aug →
mirage8–130.0313%5 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0121%5 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0314%4 Aug →
mirage5–00.0280%4 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0423%4 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0540%4 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.068%4 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0829%4 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.068%4 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.1012%4 Aug →
inferno13–90.0519%3 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0420%3 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0123%3 Aug →
mirage15–150.0216%2 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0418%2 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0218%31 Jul →
dust213–00.0918%31 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0211%31 Jul →
mirage9–130.0211%30 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0212%30 Jul →
inferno7–10.0926%29 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0021%29 Jul →
mirage11–130.0425%28 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0339%22 Jun →
nuke12–16-0.0427%29 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.