MysTE — CS2 Stats

US76561198198322471[U:1:238056743]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,578Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,972Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,638Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#33731 of 240140 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,223 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 25 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,638 -5,886 25 Jun – 18 Sept · 13 days played

30,621Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,223Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

26Days played since 2026-06-25

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,223
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 277 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

6,983 below peak (30,621)
-5,886 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,362 to go
Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=28,192), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	53.1%	51.0%
Shot accuracy	15.3%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.19	1.09
Match win rate	50.6%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning71

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD61–33–6Last 10061%Win rateWLLLLLLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −119ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 40%
Avg reaction 455ms

Last 10

3–6–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 37%
Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 34%
Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.0

Utility5.3

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels7.0

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning7.1

Utility5.3

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels7.3

Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time561ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms

Headshot accuracy32.8%+2.2%

first ⅓ avg 30.6% → last ⅓ avg 32.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 11 Jul →

100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–2 · nuke, 18 Sept →

297msFastest reaction time · 1–2 · nuke, 18 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 3 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	25	15–10	60%	0.03
dust2	A	20	11–9	55%	0.01
nuke	S	11	8–3	73%	0.03
inferno	S	10	7–3	70%	0.04
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.02
ancient	A	8	5–3	63%	0.02
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	0.02
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.04
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.05
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

127,299Lifetime kills

1.19K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

5,317Matches

50.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

53.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

15,412MVPs

2,425Hours (in match)

7,561Bombs planted

1,602Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4743,222

M4A4 / M4A1-S22,142

AWP12,410

P2000 / USP-S9,191

Desert Eagle8,073

Glock-185,469

SSG 084,983

P2502,681

Galil AR2,436

MP91,937

Lifetime map wins

10,706inferno

8,275dust2

2,708vertigo

2,279nuke

1,385train

221office

196cbble

108italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

633Matches

55%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

85.2ADR

61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	90	58%	1.21	19.0
Dust2	34	44%	1.14	17.3
Anubis	33	55%	1.07	16.6
Inferno	28	68%	1.48	20.5
Ancient	26	27%	0.95	16.4
Overpass	15	67%	1.19	17.7
Nuke	15	47%	1.05	17.5
Train	11	45%	1.07	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.8%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

87.5%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

571msReaction time

58.0%T opening success

60.6%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

10.75HE damage / grenade

4.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	16–13	0.01	26%	18 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.05	25%	18 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.04	28%	18 Sept →
nuke	1–2	-0.12	100%	18 Sept →
ancient	1–13	-0.01	21%	5 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	24%	5 Sept →
ancient	13–16	-0.02	27%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.09	42%	29 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	39%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	42%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	13%	29 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.07	35%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.10	25%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	29%	26 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.05	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.15	29%	26 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.03	46%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.04	39%	25 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	38%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.01	30%	25 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.09	42%	24 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.01	44%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	23%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	36%	24 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.15	28%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	27%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.11	37%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	29%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.00	29%	24 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.03	27%	24 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.09	25%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	33%	18 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	27%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.03	44%	18 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	36%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	27%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	47%	17 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	27%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.09	56%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	29%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.04	20%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.04	31%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	40%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	41%	13 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.06	29%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	27%	13 Jul →
anubis	2–9	-0.04	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.15	40%	12 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	20%	11 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.05	41%	11 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	23%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.17	48%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.05	41%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.04	35%	9 Jul →
fachwerk	8–13	0.01	36%	9 Jul →
shelter	13–3	0.06	56%	9 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	24%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.04	31%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	31%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.07	43%	5 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	39%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	29%	5 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.10	27%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	48%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	28%	4 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	39%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	35%	3 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.06	27%	3 Jul →
mirage	4–0	0.02	13%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.09	30%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.12	55%	3 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.14	36%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	36%	2 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	36%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.09	58%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	20%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	14%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	28%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	33%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.01	31%	30 Jun →
dust2	11–0	0.03	50%	29 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.07	25%	28 Jun →
overpass	9–13	0.03	22%	28 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	23%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	29%	28 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	19%	28 Jun →
office	13–8	0.10	37%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.03	19%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	24%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.01	33%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.04	43%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.02	30%	27 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.02	25%	27 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.01	22%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	27%	27 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	22%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.15	50%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.08	17%	25 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.09	39%	25 Jun →