Zu1K Fuck Dust II

Zu1K Fuck Dust II — CS2 Stats

DE76561198196406103[U:1:236140375]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,860Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,744Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,896Top 10% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13389 of 251601 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,896 +219 21 Jul – 12 Oct · 3 days played
25,64025,896peak 25,89621 Jul12 Oct
26,098Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-07-11

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,896
  • +219 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,104 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches54——
Win rate56%——
K/D1.26——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 14 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.6%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy20.3%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate49.1%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZu1K Fuck Dust IIFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,896 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning71
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −5.1pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.2
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time569ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 6 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 7 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · office, 3 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 22mirageWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2216–673%0.01
cacheA2011–955%0.02
ancientA159–660%0.02
mirageD80–80%0.00
officeD82–625%0.04
nukeA74–357%0.03
dust2—42–250%0.06
overpass—42–250%0.01
anubis—31–233%0.05
vertigo—33–0100%0.04
eldorado—22–0100%-0.03
debris—20–20%-0.12
boulder—10–10%-0.04
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

225,239Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,778Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
48.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
20.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
28,482MVPs
4,540Hours (in match)
5,527Bombs planted
4,019Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4769,887
AWP36,999
P2505,106
MP94,006
SG 5533,718
SSG 083,707

Lifetime map wins

22,420inferno
14,799dust2
7,862office
5,789vertigo
4,636nuke
4,094train
1,301cbble
395assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,008Matches
49%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7059%1.1417.5
Vertigo3426%1.0618.4
Ancient3250%1.0515.3
Anubis2454%1.2115.9
Nuke2458%1.2115.8
Mirage2040%1.0815.4
Dust21429%0.9413.9
Cache1250%1.3819.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
560msReaction time
57.9%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
7.57HE damage / grenade
4.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.0129%12 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0621%12 Oct →
dust216–140.0116%12 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0715%10 Oct →
dust23–130.0334%10 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0018%10 Oct →
nuke6–130.0520%10 Oct →
inferno16–120.0425%10 Oct →
ancient7–10.0115%10 Oct →
ancient13–90.0127%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.0720%5 Oct →
cache13–80.0639%4 Oct →
inferno13–50.0915%4 Oct →
mirage12–120.0921%4 Oct →
inferno13–30.0827%4 Oct →
overpass4–130.0431%4 Oct →
boulder12–12-0.0422%2 Oct →
mirage10–130.0330%2 Oct →
overpass13–70.1129%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0237%30 Sept →
anubis5–130.0613%15 Sept →
office5–130.0834%15 Sept →
cache13–50.0632%15 Sept →
vertigo9–70.0518%14 Sept →
inferno9–40.0429%14 Sept →
overpass4–9-0.1215%14 Sept →
inferno13–110.0219%13 Sept →
cache13–00.1429%13 Sept →
inferno13–20.0122%11 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0321%11 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0521%11 Sept →
vertigo9–20.1226%11 Sept →
overpass9–7-0.0022%10 Sept →
eldorado9–6-0.1031%10 Sept →
debris8–8-0.1114%10 Sept →
fachwerk13–7-0.0022%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0928%9 Sept →
vertigo9–6-0.059%8 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0315%8 Sept →
office3–13-0.0627%7 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0543%7 Sept →
nuke9–130.1233%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.2125%6 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0213%6 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0217%6 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0413%6 Sept →
cache13–60.1136%6 Sept →
dust213–70.2028%6 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0123%4 Sept →
cache8–130.0624%4 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0028%3 Sept →
ancient3–130.0522%3 Sept →
office13–50.0629%3 Sept →
office4–130.0522%3 Sept →
office9–130.0233%3 Sept →
anubis5–130.0919%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0215%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.0728%2 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0516%31 Aug →
nuke13–80.0229%31 Aug →
cache0–6-0.1113%31 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1929%31 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.0723%31 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0120%26 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0917%26 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0036%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.0117%12 Aug →
inferno13–110.0717%12 Aug →
cache13–70.0020%6 Aug →
inferno13–30.0735%6 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0318%5 Aug →
cache14–160.0023%5 Aug →
cache13–70.0231%5 Aug →
ancient13–60.0821%21 Jul →
anubis13–40.0027%21 Jul →
eldorado9–30.0514%20 Jul →
inferno9–40.0128%20 Jul →
nuke9–10.0522%20 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0119%20 Jul →
cache16–130.0625%20 Jul →
inferno7–130.0129%19 Jul →
ancient13–70.0221%19 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0316%17 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0323%17 Jul →
cache8–130.0117%16 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0326%16 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0116%15 Jul →
nuke13–110.0817%15 Jul →
debris7–9-0.1422%15 Jul →
inferno9–10.0219%15 Jul →
cache13–30.0326%15 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0217%15 Jul →
cache26–28-0.0119%12 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0226%12 Jul →
cache13–80.1414%11 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0412%11 Jul →
office12–120.1422%11 Jul →
office13–30.0311%11 Jul →
office3–130.0040%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.