majandal

majandal — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198195352007[U:1:235086279]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

441Tracked matches32%Win rate2021Tracked since
877Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating7,902Light Blue band · top ~64.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 441 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 19 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,902 +4,492 19 May17 Sept · 25 days played
3,27010,116peak 10,11619 May17 Sept
10,116Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-05-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,214 below peak (10,116)
  • -730 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,502 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,098 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate38.6%41.0%41.3%2.7% short
Shot accuracy9.2%14.1%12.6%3.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.620.950.960.33 short
Match win rate36.0%42.2%42.5%6.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 2 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmajandalFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER7,902 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning21
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44515Last 10044%Win rateLWLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility3.5
Positioning2.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning2.1
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07−0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.07
Reaction time674ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 7 Jun
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 4 Jun
484msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · vertigo, 3 Jul
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 27 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1771041%-0.04
dust2C1661038%-0.06
mirageB157847%-0.04
anubisC114736%-0.03
infernoC104640%-0.04
nukeC104640%-0.06
ancientS75271%-0.04
overpass41325%-0.07
office43175%-0.06
vertigo42250%-0.06
italy21150%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,366Lifetime kills
0.62K/D
1,413Matches
36.0%Match win rate
38.6%Headshot %
9.2%Shot accuracy
1,443MVPs
512Hours (in match)
730Bombs planted
157Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,669dust2
2,165inferno
809nuke
390office
344vertigo
83train
55safehouse
48cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
17%Win rate
0.45Avg K/D
48.5ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10%0.6710.0
Ancient10%0.335.0
Dust210%0.6710.0
Nuke10%0.8113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
663msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
17.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
5.36HE damage / grenade
4.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3948% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3916 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.0583% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0917%14 Sept
overpass13–80.0713%14 Sept
italy3–13-0.1110%14 Sept
italy13–6-0.1420%14 Sept
cache7–130.0117%7 Sept
dust213–10-0.0118%7 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0612%6 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0722%5 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0218%5 Sept
cache2–13-0.0710%5 Sept
cache0–13-0.0911%5 Sept
mirage5–13-0.098%3 Sept
office13–11-0.0824%3 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0413%2 Sept
inferno7–13-0.059%1 Sept
overpass7–13-0.1113%1 Sept
cache3–13-0.0612%1 Sept
cache13–7-0.0320%31 Aug
office12–12-0.095%30 Aug
cache8–13-0.085%30 Aug
cache12–12-0.0911%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0310%30 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0315%22 Aug
office13–8-0.0615%22 Aug
overpass4–9-0.1720%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.058%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.134%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.1027%21 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0820%21 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2214%21 Aug
cache13–9-0.0630%20 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0716%20 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0217%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0213%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0714%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%5 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0318%5 Aug
mirage12–120.0123%4 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0415%3 Aug
dust213–110.0215%3 Aug
ancient13–9-0.038%24 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0340%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0914%22 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0911%17 Jul
nuke13–6-0.048%17 Jul
dust21–6-0.120%17 Jul
cache13–8-0.0618%17 Jul
mirage13–6-0.104%16 Jul
anubis13–70.0119%16 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0927%15 Jul
cache2–10-0.050%15 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0815%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0415%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0224%7 Jul
inferno13–11-0.045%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0330%3 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0725%3 Jul
dust29–13-0.086%3 Jul
nuke4–13-0.1022%3 Jul
office13–10-0.016%1 Jul
cache8–13-0.0418%1 Jul
cache13–9-0.0423%1 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0721%29 Jun
dust213–5-0.0416%29 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0529%29 Jun
dust211–13-0.0316%29 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0322%25 Jun
cache13–40.0424%24 Jun
inferno13–110.0425%23 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0522%21 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0327%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0129%21 Jun
vertigo13–3-0.0316%21 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0914%21 Jun
cache8–13-0.0217%7 Jun
ancient6–13-0.085%7 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0316%7 Jun
inferno13–30.1522%7 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0114%7 Jun
nuke13–1-0.0418%7 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0913%5 Jun
cache13–3-0.0216%4 Jun
dust213–11-0.1018%4 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0144%4 Jun
mirage13–50.0214%2 Jun
dust213–11-0.0216%31 May
inferno13–1-0.0418%31 May
mirage10–13-0.0911%31 May
cache4–13-0.087%31 May
anubis12–120.026%31 May
anubis3–13-0.105%31 May
mirage13–60.0511%30 May
nuke9–13-0.0813%29 May
dust27–13-0.0727%27 May
anubis13–00.048%27 May
anubis11–20.0135%27 May
dust28–13-0.0915%27 May
cache13–80.0328%25 May
mirage8–13-0.047%24 May
mirage13–8-0.0610%19 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →