MARTTI NRO 1 BÄMÄ

MARTTI NRO 1 BÄMÄ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198195206351[U:1:234940623]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,310Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,629Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,764Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98333 of 251282 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,764 +169 31 Aug – 7 Oct · 25 days played
16,87220,193peak 20,19331 Aug7 Oct
20,940Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,187Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,187
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 14 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,429 below peak (20,193)
  • +1,892 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,236 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches66——
Win rate45%——
K/D0.83——
Headshot %61%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate61.6%44.3%46.9%above
Shot accuracy17.0%11.9%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.031.080.25 short
Match win rate40.3%45.2%46.7%6.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMARTTI NRO 1 BÄMÄPREMIER18,764 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,187csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning50
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time629ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 15 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 20 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · cache, 28 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 14nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB178–947%-0.02
anubisC146–843%-0.01
cacheA148–657%-0.02
mirageD144–1029%-0.02
infernoC146–843%-0.03
dust2B136–746%-0.00
nukeD133–1023%-0.00
overpass—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

180,595Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
6,916Matches
40.3%Match win rate
61.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Purple band
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
12,458MVPs
3,629Hours (in match)
7,296Bombs planted
1,378Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4773,122
AWP10,278
P2505,007
FAMAS2,471
SSG 081,856

Lifetime map wins

9,876inferno
5,715dust2
4,389train
3,489nuke
2,059cbble
1,772vertigo
105office
44lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

944Matches
54%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
69.2ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2846%0.9415.3
Ancient2446%0.8112.8
Mirage2060%1.2117.3
Dust21741%0.8411.5
Inferno1669%1.0615.3
Nuke1362%1.0114.3
Train667%0.507.0
Vertigo580%0.9315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.7%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
637msReaction time
47.3%T opening success
32.2%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
11.85HE damage / grenade
5.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.2019% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–20.1923%7 Oct →
anubis8–130.0124%7 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0919%6 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0527%6 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0525%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.058%6 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0327%5 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0826%5 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0119%5 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0638%4 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0618%4 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0221%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0229%1 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0226%1 Oct →
dust216–14-0.084%1 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0117%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0314%29 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0520%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0224%29 Sept →
ancient13–90.0124%28 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0121%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0437%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0225%28 Sept →
cache16–140.0026%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0215%23 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0241%22 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0723%22 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0917%21 Sept →
inferno13–100.0236%21 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0239%21 Sept →
ancient13–70.0233%21 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0031%21 Sept →
anubis11–130.0441%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0260%20 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0636%20 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0512%19 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0626%19 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0430%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0336%19 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0835%18 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0333%18 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0430%17 Sept →
cache13–50.0132%17 Sept →
ancient9–130.0127%17 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0626%17 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0114%17 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0528%16 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0128%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0326%16 Sept →
dust27–130.0035%15 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0236%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0432%15 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0135%15 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0127%15 Sept →
overpass8–8-0.0023%15 Sept →
nuke9–10.3615%15 Sept →
dust213–30.0736%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0732%8 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0138%8 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0127%8 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0328%7 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0821%7 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0518%7 Sept →
mirage5–130.0036%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0138%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0152%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0830%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0518%6 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0129%6 Sept →
anubis10–130.0124%6 Sept →
cache4–130.0130%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0519%6 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0233%6 Sept →
mirage10–130.0036%4 Sept →
inferno13–70.0125%4 Sept →
mirage14–160.0527%4 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0529%4 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0333%4 Sept →
nuke16–130.0039%4 Sept →
cache13–90.0122%4 Sept →
dust27–130.0124%4 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0929%4 Sept →
anubis13–10.0257%4 Sept →
dust213–70.0126%3 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0028%3 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0229%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0329%2 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0130%2 Sept →
mirage13–100.0225%2 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0628%2 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0444%2 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0124%2 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0623%2 Sept →
cache13–110.0326%1 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0127%1 Sept →
ancient13–70.0233%31 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0320%31 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0224%31 Aug →
nuke15–150.0541%31 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0331%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.