dog 3

dog 3 — CS2 Stats

HK76561198190598871[U:1:230333143]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

398Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,066Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#41682 of 221350 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 29 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,673 +1,328 29 May15 Jun · 7 days played
20,23922,673peak 22,67329 May15 Jun
22,888Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2025-05-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.4%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy16.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.061.07above
Match win rate35.5%46.3%46.9%11.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdog 3FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning57
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.8

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time629ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 10–1 · anubis, 28 Jul
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 15 Jul
469msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 23 Jul
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 23 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
133In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 49% over 35
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35171849%-0.00
dust2A2213959%0.01
anubisA1610663%0.01
nukeA106460%-0.02
infernoB84450%-0.02
ancientS64267%0.01
train32167%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (49% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

114,159Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
4,200Matches
35.5%Match win rate
47.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8,977MVPs
2,066Hours (in match)
2,911Bombs planted
613Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,806
AWP9,916
P908,790
UMP-452,279
MAC-101,812
Tec-91,710

Lifetime map wins

17,160dust2
2,136inferno
1,056office
805cbble
592train
480nuke
273vertigo
222italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

185Matches
57%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4959%1.1617.1
Dust22374%1.3417.4
Anubis2255%1.1716.9
Inferno1464%0.9814.0
Ancient1155%0.9613.6
Nuke743%0.9916.4
Train333%1.1118.0
Cache10%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
642msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
11.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5617% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

49% win rate across 35 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0325%31 Jul
anubis10–10.1444%28 Jul
inferno13–110.0526%23 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0230%23 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0224%22 Jul
mirage5–130.0424%22 Jul
dust213–11-0.0218%20 Jul
dust213–11-0.0221%19 Jul
nuke16–140.0129%19 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0315%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0524%17 Jul
mirage3–130.0112%17 Jul
ancient13–40.0529%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0023%17 Jul
dust24–13-0.0626%16 Jul
ancient8–30.0129%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0540%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0426%15 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0152%15 Jul
dust20–13-0.040%15 Jul
dust213–20.0920%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0124%4 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0827%3 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0230%3 Jul
dust216–14-0.0138%3 Jul
mirage19–22-0.0721%29 Jun
dust28–13-0.0512%28 Jun
ancient8–130.0229%21 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0216%21 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0419%21 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0514%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0724%20 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0327%19 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0021%19 Jun
dust27–130.0516%18 Jun
dust216–120.0826%18 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0716%18 Jun
dust213–30.039%18 Jun
train12–160.0128%17 Jun
anubis13–70.0519%17 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0020%17 Jun
dust213–6-0.0028%17 Jun
anubis13–30.049%16 Jun
mirage13–110.0220%16 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0425%15 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0019%15 Jun
mirage13–110.0131%15 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0732%13 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0622%13 Jun
dust213–40.0630%13 Jun
dust213–70.0116%13 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0521%12 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0122%12 Jun
mirage13–20.0617%12 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0018%12 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0418%11 Jun
dust210–13-0.0238%11 Jun
anubis13–60.0418%10 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0420%10 Jun
mirage13–80.0217%10 Jun
anubis13–110.0315%10 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0320%9 Jun
mirage13–30.0628%9 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0133%8 Jun
mirage13–80.0322%8 Jun
anubis13–60.0416%8 Jun
mirage13–60.0113%8 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0933%8 Jun
mirage16–19-0.0312%8 Jun
ancient13–60.0122%8 Jun
dust216–14-0.0123%8 Jun
mirage13–90.0312%7 Jun
dust212–120.0629%7 Jun
dust213–70.0438%7 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0623%6 Jun
anubis13–70.0326%6 Jun
train13–60.0611%6 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0317%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0220%6 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0120%6 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0114%3 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0212%2 Jun
nuke16–130.0327%1 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0315%1 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0141%1 Jun
train13–11-0.0139%1 Jun
mirage13–80.0113%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.0413%1 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0130%31 May
dust25–13-0.0027%31 May
mirage13–90.0118%31 May
dust28–13-0.0026%31 May
inferno7–13-0.0020%31 May
anubis7–13-0.0324%30 May
inferno4–13-0.0421%30 May
mirage13–50.0932%30 May
ancient9–130.0228%29 May
dust213–110.0020%29 May
dust213–100.0433%29 May
nuke10–13-0.0430%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →