MintTheLoonaSimp

MintTheLoonaSimp — CS2 Stats

US76561198184547329[U:1:224281601]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,436Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,765Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#87601 of 251518 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,646 -354 4 Sept – 19 Sept · 3 days played
19,64620,000peak 20,0004 Sept19 Sept
20,539Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.1%43.7%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy5.4%12.0%12.4%7.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.401.021.03above
Match win rate47.4%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMintTheLoonaSimpFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning75
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–40–14Last 10046%Win rateWLWLWLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −6.0pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.3
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.5
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact4.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time521ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–11 · vertigo, 20 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 5 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · mirage, 3 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 25mirageWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2514–1156%0.06
mirageD185–1328%0.02
cacheB147–750%0.05
dust2B115–645%0.06
vertigoA116–555%0.07
infernoC94–544%0.04
ancientC52–340%0.01
anubis—31–233%0.04
office—21–150%0.06
poseidon—11–0100%0.16
train—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,308Lifetime kills
1.40K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
3,049Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
45.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
5.4%Shot accuracy
10,401MVPs
952Hours (in match)
1,969Bombs planted
1,824Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,622
AWP4,479
SSG 082,383
MP92,107
P901,380
Tec-91,311

Lifetime map wins

5,217dust2
3,634office
3,012nuke
2,415inferno
2,038vertigo
371cbble
214train
69lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
57%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
102.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%1.5526.3
Ancient10%0.8713.0
Dust21100%1.5018.0
Inferno1100%1.1919.0
Nuke1100%1.5323.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
526msReaction time
56.9%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
4.78HE damage / grenade
7.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0634%11 Oct →
cache10–130.0519%11 Oct →
nuke13–60.019%11 Oct →
mirage6–130.0321%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.0220%11 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0717%11 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0111%8 Oct →
cache13–50.1515%8 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0021%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.0628%7 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0331%7 Oct →
nuke10–130.0323%6 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0522%5 Oct →
nuke13–100.0328%5 Oct →
mirage3–130.0354%5 Oct →
vertigo13–30.109%4 Oct →
dust28–130.0822%3 Oct →
inferno12–120.0526%3 Oct →
cache13–60.1722%1 Oct →
cache12–120.1120%1 Oct →
vertigo10–130.0823%1 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0121%1 Oct →
nuke12–120.1123%1 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0329%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0610%29 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0317%29 Sept →
dust213–70.1926%29 Sept →
mirage9–130.0214%28 Sept →
nuke5–130.1111%28 Sept →
nuke13–30.0731%28 Sept →
nuke13–40.2128%26 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0020%25 Sept →
mirage12–120.0614%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.1015%25 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0116%24 Sept →
inferno13–80.0318%24 Sept →
nuke13–80.0119%23 Sept →
ancient13–30.0610%23 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0824%23 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0915%23 Sept →
inferno13–90.0926%23 Sept →
vertigo13–20.1230%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.0521%21 Sept →
nuke13–60.0820%21 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0720%21 Sept →
nuke13–50.0317%21 Sept →
dust212–120.0127%21 Sept →
cache7–30.0737%21 Sept →
mirage8–130.0117%21 Sept →
office13–50.1222%20 Sept →
dust25–130.1014%20 Sept →
vertigo13–110.2418%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0731%20 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1123%19 Sept →
anubis13–80.0126%19 Sept →
nuke11–130.0232%19 Sept →
anubis12–120.1328%18 Sept →
nuke13–50.1122%18 Sept →
poseidon9–20.1621%18 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0323%18 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0316%18 Sept →
dust213–100.1618%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.1221%17 Sept →
dust213–80.0620%17 Sept →
cache13–100.0724%17 Sept →
mirage8–30.0829%17 Sept →
nuke10–100.0529%16 Sept →
dust213–110.0325%15 Sept →
nuke13–60.1223%15 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0317%15 Sept →
ancient10–130.0217%15 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0820%15 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0322%15 Sept →
dust23–70.0821%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0633%14 Sept →
cache11–130.017%14 Sept →
train12–120.0316%14 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0022%12 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0113%12 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0332%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0521%11 Sept →
nuke11–130.0824%9 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0123%9 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0024%5 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0123%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0415%4 Sept →
cache13–60.0325%4 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0313%4 Sept →
inferno6–130.0317%4 Sept →
nuke11–130.0322%4 Sept →
inferno13–60.1321%4 Sept →
inferno6–130.0519%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.1426%3 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0320%3 Sept →
mirage12–120.0214%3 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0028%3 Sept →
nuke12–120.1027%3 Sept →
cache13–40.1420%3 Sept →
ancient2–130.0113%3 Sept →
office5–13-0.0031%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.