Lämsy — CS2 Stats

76561198184303631[U:1:224037903]✓ No bans

1,504Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 Learning
Premier CS Rating23,038Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9074 of 40739 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,843 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLämsyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,843 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,038 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning29
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.4
Aggression0.1
Utility5.1
Positioning2.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning2.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics2.3
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time630ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — ancient 13–6
131Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
18In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB20101050%-0.04
infernoB179853%-0.04
nukeA149564%-0.05
mirageD134931%-0.06
dust2A116555%-0.05
anubisC94544%-0.05
cacheC94544%-0.01
overpass440100%-0.00
vertigo2020%-0.16
poseidon1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

489Matches
56%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
54.2ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7162%0.8111.0
Mirage6442%0.6710.3
Ancient6162%0.6911.3
Inferno4959%0.7711.0
Nuke3866%0.739.6
Dust23250%0.7410.5
Train1669%0.7811.7
Overpass1464%0.858.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.1%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
60.2%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
627msReaction time
12.4%T opening success
18.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
5.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0767° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.0829% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0214%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0218%29 Aug
cache6–13-0.0317%29 Aug
ancient13–2-0.075%29 Aug
ancient16–12-0.059%16 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0915%16 Aug
cache2–13-0.0822%16 Aug
inferno9–20.0117%14 Aug
nuke13–8-0.047%8 Aug
ancient13–50.037%8 Aug
cache13–50.024%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0213%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.135%8 Aug
anubis13–8-0.075%8 Aug
ancient13–60.099%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0612%8 Aug
nuke4–13-0.095%6 Aug
ancient3–130.0328%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0210%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0614%6 Aug
cache13–30.009%6 Aug
inferno15–15-0.076%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0213%5 Aug
mirage13–60.017%5 Aug
nuke13–100.0213%5 Aug
ancient13–9-0.077%5 Aug
nuke13–7-0.069%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0612%4 Aug
cache13–5-0.0114%4 Aug
dust213–3-0.0413%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.1213%4 Aug
nuke13–9-0.083%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0112%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.0919%3 Aug
inferno8–13-0.067%3 Aug
anubis10–13-0.068%22 Jul
dust213–30.0312%22 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0419%22 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0310%22 Jul
nuke9–13-0.084%22 Jul
inferno13–20.0616%22 Jul
cache5–13-0.046%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.1016%10 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0512%10 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0211%10 Jul
cache13–40.0417%10 Jul
dust213–4-0.0413%26 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0720%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.099%26 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0112%26 Jun
ancient10–13-0.089%7 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0119%7 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0720%7 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0515%7 Jun
dust28–13-0.054%7 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0813%7 Jun
nuke3–13-0.130%6 Jun
inferno13–4-0.047%6 Jun
mirage13–9-0.077%15 May
ancient3–13-0.1118%15 May
dust216–13-0.068%15 May
inferno8–13-0.0725%15 May
nuke13–8-0.0425%13 May
ancient13–7-0.0824%13 May
inferno11–13-0.028%13 May
overpass13–9-0.0313%9 May
mirage13–7-0.037%9 May
inferno13–2-0.013%9 May
ancient13–9-0.029%9 May
nuke13–9-0.050%9 May
anubis13–2-0.0420%9 May
dust213–1-0.0126%9 May
dust213–30.0013%5 May
nuke13–3-0.038%5 May
ancient11–13-0.075%5 May
inferno13–8-0.0520%2 May
ancient13–9-0.014%2 May
mirage13–16-0.067%2 May
inferno13–7-0.086%2 May
ancient13–9-0.0412%2 May
anubis13–9-0.0615%2 May
dust29–13-0.0717%2 May
cache3–130.0216%2 May
inferno14–16-0.0415%18 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0116%18 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0610%18 Apr
anubis13–30.022%18 Apr
ancient13–50.0118%18 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0426%18 Apr
vertigo4–9-0.2610%18 Apr
overpass9–30.037%18 Apr
nuke9–00.0425%18 Apr
inferno6–9-0.1531%18 Apr
vertigo6–9-0.076%18 Apr
poseidon2–9-0.0321%18 Apr
ancient10–13-0.090%18 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0410%18 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0512%12 Apr
ancient10–13-0.044%12 Apr
overpass13–90.0113%11 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →