Stinx — CS2 Stats

US76561198182599678[U:1:222333950]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,215Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,712Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,672Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1853 of 34681 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,672Peak Premier on CSDB

2,314Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,314
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 186 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 26,672
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,328 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,873), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Red band median
Headshot rate	51.1%	49.9%
Shot accuracy	15.6%	13.4%
Kill/death ratio	0.91	1.12
Match win rate	45.1%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning44

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWWLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression4.3

Utility5.5

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels0.7

Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning4.4

Utility5.5

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time667ms+26ms

first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms

Headshot accuracy23.6%+5.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–7

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

W2Current streak

13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.00
nuke	S	19	13–6	68%	0.00
dust2	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
inferno	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.02
cache	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.03
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

135,039Lifetime kills

0.91K/D

5,778Matches

45.1%Match win rate

51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band

15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Red band

13,380MVPs

5,451Hours (in match)

5,640Bombs planted

1,598Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,743

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,095

AWP13,594

P2000 / USP-S11,592

Desert Eagle11,215

Glock-184,168

SSG 082,966

Knife2,834

Tec-92,705

P2502,324

Lifetime map wins

14,659dust2

7,855inferno

5,141vertigo

4,121nuke

2,037train

795cbble

261office

168lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,118Matches

56%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

79.6ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	116	51%	1.02	14.6
Ancient	108	58%	1.07	15.1
Dust2	107	56%	1.16	16.5
Anubis	66	61%	0.96	13.7
Inferno	55	40%	0.90	14.2
Nuke	45	51%	1.12	15.7
Vertigo	37	68%	1.11	16.1
Overpass	22	59%	0.99	15.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.9%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

655msReaction time

25.3%T opening success

40.1%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

8.86HE damage / grenade

5.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.2799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–3	-0.02	38%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	21%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	26%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	25%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	39%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	38%	11 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	40%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	14%	31 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.03	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	39%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.03	27%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.03	24%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	32%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	33%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.01	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	16%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	11%	15 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	15%	14 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	28%	11 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	11%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–12	0.04	14%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.08	29%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	23%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	22%	23 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.00	23%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.03	19%	21 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	27%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.04	16%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.01	20%	14 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	21%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.09	17%	11 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.01	21%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.07	23%	4 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	29%	2 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	10%	28 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	28%	28 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.12	14%	8 Mar →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	15%	2 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	22%	1 Mar →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	18%	1 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.00	16%	27 Feb →
nuke	13–2	0.05	6%	25 Feb →
dust2	13–8	0.02	7%	24 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	14%	24 Feb →
ancient	10–13	0.04	22%	24 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	33%	23 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	17%	23 Feb →
nuke	19–16	0.04	27%	23 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	16%	22 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	26%	22 Feb →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	32%	22 Feb →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	29%	22 Feb →
dust2	13–2	0.00	9%	22 Feb →
inferno	16–13	0.02	16%	21 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	16%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–0	0.07	18%	21 Feb →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	13%	21 Feb →
mirage	14–16	0.05	23%	21 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.05	25%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	38%	21 Feb →
overpass	9–1	0.04	17%	20 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	13%	20 Feb →
ancient	13–3	0.04	13%	18 Feb →
anubis	16–14	0.00	20%	18 Feb →
mirage	19–16	0.01	23%	18 Feb →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	24%	18 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	18%	17 Feb →
ancient	7–13	0.01	29%	4 Feb →
mirage	15–15	0.07	23%	1 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.01	17%	1 Feb →
overpass	4–13	-0.03	18%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	8%	1 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.04	9%	1 Feb →
dust2	13–8	0.06	28%	28 Jan →
inferno	6–13	0.00	25%	26 Jan →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	12%	21 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	24%	10 Jan →
inferno	15–15	0.01	14%	6 Jan →
nuke	10–13	-0.10	16%	4 Jan →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	16%	4 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.05	15%	2 Jan →
mirage	16–14	0.01	14%	1 Jan →
overpass	2–13	-0.09	3%	30 Dec →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	13%	30 Dec →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	20%	30 Dec →
nuke	4–13	0.01	7%	29 Dec →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	9%	29 Dec →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	27%	28 Dec →
nuke	13–8	0.03	12%	28 Dec →
ancient	13–5	0.00	17%	28 Dec →
dust2	11–13	0.02	35%	27 Dec →
ancient	14–16	0.02	12%	27 Dec →
dust2	10–13	0.03	18%	27 Dec →
nuke	16–14	0.04	24%	22 Dec →
dust2	13–7	0.09	29%	22 Dec →