Di

Di — CS2 Stats

PT76561198178237747[U:1:217972019]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

701Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,520Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,120Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17545 of 219839 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,120 → 25,120
+11Tracked matches · now 701
+3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,120 +1,606 4 Jun10 Sept · 29 days played
22,41525,120peak 25,1204 Jun10 Sept
25,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-06-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,120
  • +1,347 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,437 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,880 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches10
Win rate70%
K/D1.16
Headshot %42%

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate35.7%48.3%51.0%15.3% short
Shot accuracy16.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.981.071.090.10 short
Match win rate64.5%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDiFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,120 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning51
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58402Last 10058%Win rateWWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.8
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.1
Utility6.8
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time535ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 23 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · inferno, 15 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 4–5 · mirage, 29 Jun
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 76% over 17dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2720774%0.03
mirageB23111248%0.02
cacheS1713476%0.02
ancientB115645%0.00
nukeC94544%0.02
dust2D62433%0.00
overpassC52340%0.01
anubis21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

151,469Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
10,430Matches
64.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 9 players
35.7%Headshot %
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
13,443MVPs
2,542Hours (in match)
5,166Bombs planted
1,623Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,680
AWP28,286
Knife6,733
P905,261
P2502,557
SSG 082,326

Lifetime map wins

8,207inferno
7,161dust2
2,629nuke
1,618vertigo
1,554train
576cbble
283dust
177office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

245Matches
60%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
91.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2778%1.4318.7
Mirage2157%1.6718.2
Cache1861%1.3818.9
Ancient617%1.0516.8
Dust2560%1.8828.6
Nuke580%1.5319.4
Overpass10%1.0617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
535msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
12.46HE damage / grenade
9.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7591% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0438%15 Sept
inferno7–10.168%9 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0629%2 Sept
inferno13–50.0226%2 Sept
inferno13–80.0813%29 Aug
cache13–10-0.019%29 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0714%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0315%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0719%28 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0211%28 Aug
mirage13–40.2116%23 Aug
inferno13–20.0213%23 Aug
inferno13–00.0411%23 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0224%23 Aug
dust211–130.0123%21 Aug
cache13–110.0625%21 Aug
cache13–7-0.075%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.047%20 Aug
dust24–13-0.0519%20 Aug
ancient3–13-0.008%20 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0517%19 Aug
mirage7–130.0124%19 Aug
inferno13–10.0323%18 Aug
cache13–7-0.017%18 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0717%8 Aug
mirage13–160.0012%8 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0111%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0113%8 Aug
ancient13–00.0014%8 Aug
cache13–50.0221%8 Aug
nuke10–130.0319%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0615%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0111%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0313%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0312%7 Aug
cache16–13-0.034%6 Aug
mirage8–5-0.059%6 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0417%6 Aug
mirage13–30.1526%5 Aug
mirage13–16-0.029%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0813%4 Aug
nuke9–130.016%4 Aug
cache11–130.047%4 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0417%3 Aug
inferno13–90.085%3 Aug
cache13–70.0235%3 Aug
cache7–130.0517%3 Aug
ancient13–70.0118%31 Jul
cache9–130.0314%31 Jul
ancient13–80.079%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0113%24 Jul
mirage13–7-0.046%24 Jul
ancient9–130.0424%24 Jul
ancient12–16-0.029%23 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0313%23 Jul
cache13–30.0411%23 Jul
mirage13–70.0517%21 Jul
nuke10–130.089%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0124%20 Jul
cache3–13-0.0526%20 Jul
inferno13–60.0915%16 Jul
inferno16–130.0112%16 Jul
cache13–70.0412%13 Jul
cache13–20.0713%13 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0220%12 Jul
inferno13–60.0310%12 Jul
overpass13–30.0820%4 Jul
inferno13–70.0715%4 Jul
mirage13–100.1311%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0415%3 Jul
ancient13–50.0312%3 Jul
nuke6–13-0.026%2 Jul
overpass13–70.006%2 Jul
mirage13–80.029%1 Jul
mirage13–110.023%1 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0216%1 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0013%29 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0230%29 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0521%29 Jun
mirage4–50.0513%29 Jun
overpass9–130.0111%29 Jun
inferno13–110.0321%29 Jun
inferno13–90.0216%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0023%28 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0129%28 Jun
inferno13–80.0317%27 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0222%27 Jun
nuke13–90.079%25 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0213%25 Jun
inferno16–130.0813%22 Jun
mirage14–160.0118%20 Jun
dust213–8-0.0112%16 Jun
inferno15–150.0717%16 Jun
cache13–50.098%13 Jun
inferno13–80.039%8 Jun
dust219–170.0720%8 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0114%7 Jun
cache16–140.107%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0312%4 Jun
cache19–160.0614%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →