Megaris

Megaris — CS2 Stats

HM76561198177027851[U:1:216762123]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,173Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,397Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#79620 of 232560 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,894 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 7 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,884 -19 7 Jun22 Jun · 3 days played
19,88419,999peak 19,9997 Jun22 Jun
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,894Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-06-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,894
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 107 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.0%46.8%48.3%8.3% short
Shot accuracy12.8%13.0%13.2%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.061.07meets
Match win rate41.2%46.3%46.9%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMegarisFACEITLevel 8 · 1,894 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,894csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning56
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time514ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 11 Aug
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 20 Jul
344msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 20 Aug
12–0Biggest win · cache, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
813In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 29cacheWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA29181162%0.01
ancientB1991047%-0.01
infernoA1911858%-0.02
nukeA169756%-0.02
cacheC104640%-0.01
mirage21150%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.04
overpass220100%-0.04
dust2110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

103,308Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,532Matches
41.2%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
12.8%Shot accuracy
11,333MVPs
2,070Hours (in match)
5,825Bombs planted
1,570Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,859
AWP13,109
P903,736
Knife3,014
P2502,645
MAC-102,609

Lifetime map wins

10,242inferno
4,479dust2
2,952vertigo
2,111nuke
1,109train
539cbble
434office
173lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

490Matches
52%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
76.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6865%1.2516.3
Ancient6650%1.0014.7
Anubis6156%1.1114.9
Nuke3949%0.9915.6
Dust23653%1.1715.5
Cache2050%1.2213.7
Mirage1540%1.2215.9
Overpass956%1.2711.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
68.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
511msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
11.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8583% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0514%17 Sept
anubis13–20.1215%16 Sept
anubis13–80.0217%16 Sept
nuke3–13-0.098%16 Sept
cache12–00.0823%15 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0013%15 Sept
cache6–130.0015%14 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0217%14 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0121%13 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0027%13 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0415%11 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0413%11 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0317%8 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0619%8 Sept
inferno13–50.1224%7 Sept
cache13–9-0.0114%7 Sept
anubis13–11-0.027%7 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0116%6 Sept
anubis5–13-0.032%6 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0517%3 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0412%3 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0416%2 Sept
dust213–11-0.0216%1 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0116%1 Sept
ancient13–80.0615%31 Aug
cache13–70.0916%31 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0512%27 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0115%27 Aug
nuke19–160.0028%27 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0019%26 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0120%24 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0116%24 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0114%24 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0317%23 Aug
anubis13–90.1312%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0112%20 Aug
anubis13–50.0413%20 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0517%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0124%18 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0222%18 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0530%17 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0610%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0413%14 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1111%13 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0123%12 Aug
cache9–13-0.0317%12 Aug
vertigo6–9-0.0633%11 Aug
nuke9–50.1310%11 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1529%11 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0217%10 Aug
nuke0–9-0.1513%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0426%9 Aug
nuke19–16-0.0317%9 Aug
cache13–16-0.0417%5 Aug
cache13–60.0515%3 Aug
nuke9–130.0027%3 Aug
inferno19–150.0222%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0313%3 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0124%2 Aug
anubis10–130.0414%2 Aug
anubis6–130.0115%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0317%29 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0323%22 Jul
ancient13–70.0730%20 Jul
nuke13–70.0335%20 Jul
nuke13–30.0318%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0618%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0113%17 Jul
anubis19–15-0.0413%15 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0923%15 Jul
ancient13–40.0224%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0511%7 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0222%7 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0613%7 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0220%6 Jul
ancient13–50.0221%6 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0117%5 Jul
ancient16–120.0218%5 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0014%5 Jul
cache10–13-0.0817%4 Jul
inferno13–80.0122%3 Jul
ancient13–70.0116%3 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0423%3 Jul
anubis13–90.0622%3 Jul
inferno13–9-0.048%2 Jul
cache2–13-0.0927%2 Jul
cache14–16-0.0526%30 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0220%30 Jun
inferno13–40.0824%30 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0111%30 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0521%28 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0316%28 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0614%24 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0213%24 Jun
ancient13–100.0118%24 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0220%22 Jun
anubis13–70.0319%22 Jun
inferno14–160.0116%22 Jun
anubis13–80.0514%12 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0231%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →