Ixodes ricinus

Ixodes ricinus — CS2 Stats

DK76561198176646286[U:1:216380558]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,377Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,887Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,040 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (59 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,040 → 2,040
+82Tracked matches · now 3,377
+10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 66.7%

Rating over time

2,040Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
69Days played since 2025-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,040
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 460 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate32.3%48.2%50.9%18.6% short
Shot accuracy15.5%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.071.090.07 short
Match win rate41.9%46.9%48.4%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIxodes ricinusFACEITLevel 9 · 2,040 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,040csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning64
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time522ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 28 Jul →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · dust2, 25 Jan →
391msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · mirage, 25 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 30 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 23ancientWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2317–674%0.03
ancientC219–1243%-0.00
infernoB2110–1148%-0.00
anubisA106–460%-0.01
overpassB105–550%-0.02
mirageA74–357%0.01
cache—31–233%-0.00
train—31–233%-0.03
dust2—20–20%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

163,658Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
7,479Matches
41.9%Match win rate
32.3%Headshot %
15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17,288MVPs
3,536Hours (in match)
9,741Bombs planted
2,380Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,957
AWP36,606
FAMAS5,564
SG 5534,389
MAC-103,669

Lifetime map wins

17,592nuke
17,273inferno
11,231vertigo
3,550dust2
2,572train
329office
88cbble
78lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,572Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.2ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient45549%1.0916.4
Inferno33147%1.0715.2
Nuke30361%1.1316.1
Anubis30249%1.0415.5
Mirage11732%0.8913.7
Overpass10646%0.9915.0
Dust26131%0.9714.4
Vertigo4943%1.0115.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
523msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
9.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–140.0413%25 Oct →
ancient13–100.0517%11 Oct →
ancient9–130.0413%22 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0111%20 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.039%17 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0115%16 Sept →
nuke13–100.0916%15 Sept →
cache13–40.0824%15 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0811%22 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0315%19 Aug →
anubis8–130.0114%10 Aug →
nuke13–100.0324%10 Aug →
nuke13–40.0817%16 Jul →
ancient16–12-0.0311%14 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0422%14 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0418%11 Jul →
anubis19–160.0116%8 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0226%8 Jul →
anubis7–130.0519%22 Jun →
anubis13–60.016%8 Jun →
nuke13–110.0320%4 Jun →
nuke13–80.0616%4 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0117%4 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0317%3 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0114%3 Jun →
nuke13–50.0310%31 May →
nuke13–40.0615%30 May →
nuke13–20.0914%30 May →
ancient6–13-0.0210%30 May →
inferno13–10-0.0413%27 May →
inferno7–13-0.026%3 May →
cache4–13-0.067%30 Apr →
nuke5–130.007%18 Apr →
nuke9–130.0516%15 Apr →
inferno22–180.0310%14 Apr →
ancient13–2-0.059%13 Apr →
anubis13–5-0.083%5 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0116%2 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.028%1 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0119%1 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0414%30 Mar →
ancient13–40.0313%28 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0416%19 Mar →
anubis16–13-0.0116%11 Mar →
inferno10–130.0124%24 Feb →
nuke11–130.0112%24 Feb →
mirage13–100.0311%18 Feb →
nuke13–60.0322%18 Feb →
inferno13–4-0.0810%15 Feb →
nuke13–60.0014%15 Feb →
mirage13–70.0224%13 Feb →
anubis13–50.0910%10 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0410%10 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.015%8 Feb →
dust215–150.0131%25 Jan →
overpass3–13-0.0614%24 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0313%24 Jan →
ancient13–16-0.0225%15 Jan →
overpass10–13-0.0115%11 Jan →
inferno7–130.0115%11 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.029%2 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.009%2 Jan →
ancient11–130.0018%30 Dec →
mirage4–13-0.024%25 Dec →
ancient9–13-0.019%18 Dec →
nuke14–16-0.0210%7 Dec →
mirage3–130.0120%18 Nov →
inferno6–130.0725%10 Nov →
inferno13–110.069%9 Nov →
nuke16–120.0013%9 Nov →
nuke13–90.0617%9 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0111%6 Nov →
ancient13–70.0314%4 Nov →
nuke13–50.0821%3 Nov →
overpass16–130.0217%3 Nov →
train24–28-0.0313%20 Sept →
inferno8–80.0622%19 Sept →
overpass9–13-0.069%12 Sept →
inferno13–60.018%12 Sept →
ancient14–160.0214%12 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0125%9 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0110%9 Sept →
train13–9-0.0410%9 Sept →
inferno13–50.014%24 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0317%20 Aug →
overpass13–8-0.0119%19 Aug →
train6–13-0.0317%12 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0012%10 Aug →
ancient8–130.012%2 Aug →
overpass13–7-0.0113%2 Aug →
overpass13–100.0013%30 Jul →
inferno19–22-0.0113%30 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.017%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0613%30 Jul →
inferno19–150.015%28 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.0418%28 Jul →
nuke13–50.1314%28 Jul →
overpass13–8-0.0018%28 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0122%25 Jul →
ancient16–140.058%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.