MP5 PEEK

MP5 PEEK — CS2 Stats

DK76561198176504923[U:1:216239195]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

281Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
193Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,730 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,879 +6,186 28 Apr – 8 Jan · 14 days played
9,69318,977peak 18,97728 Apr8 Jan
18,977Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,730Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2025-03-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,730
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 21 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.9%46.8%48.2%2.3% short
Shot accuracy2.3%13.0%13.2%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.07meets
Match win rate47.4%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMP5 PEEKFACEITLevel 8 · 1,730 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,730csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning48
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–54Last 10046%Win rateLLWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −11.1pp headshot accuracy · +44ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.6
Utility4.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time492ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 29 Apr →
77%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 3 Jun →
63msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 3 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
2–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2411–1346%0.03
nukeA2011–955%0.03
mirageD134–931%0.01
dust2C135–838%0.01
ancientD113–827%0.02
overpassA53–260%-0.00
cacheS54–180%0.01
anubis—42–250%0.07
vertigo—31–233%0.01
train—11–0100%0.08
transit—11–0100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,083Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
479Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
45.9%Headshot %
2.3%Shot accuracy
1,369MVPs
193Hours (in match)
435Bombs planted
134Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,175inferno
983nuke
630dust2
78train
55vertigo
46office
4lake
2bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

219Matches
50%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
100.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6156%1.4920.6
Nuke5250%1.3019.3
Ancient4055%1.3621.2
Overpass2450%1.3521.1
Dust21839%1.1817.9
Mirage1429%1.0216.7
Train667%1.4422.7
Anubis425%1.2719.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
503msReaction time
42.4%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
5.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4677 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0515%1 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0019%1 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0615%1 Aug →
overpass13–80.0517%31 Jul →
vertigo6–13-0.0218%31 Jul →
nuke0–13-0.0633%31 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.048%31 Jul →
inferno13–70.0718%31 Jul →
cache13–20.0218%31 Jul →
overpass13–50.037%31 Jul →
mirage4–130.0510%31 Jul →
nuke13–40.0319%31 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0111%31 Jul →
inferno11–130.0816%31 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0132%31 Jul →
vertigo8–13-0.0213%31 Jul →
dust25–130.0214%31 Jul →
mirage1–130.0445%18 Jul →
dust213–30.0247%18 Jul →
inferno9–130.0371%18 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0347%18 Jul →
nuke0–10-0.1420%11 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0425%11 Jul →
cache8–00.0250%11 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0314%11 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.0217%11 Jul →
nuke0–13-0.0425%11 Jul →
cache13–90.039%11 Jul →
mirage13–70.0215%11 Jul →
inferno13–60.0322%11 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0226%11 Jul →
cache2–80.0113%1 May →
overpass2–13-0.0424%29 Mar →
dust213–60.0620%28 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.006%19 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0421%15 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0213%26 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0415%26 Feb →
mirage13–16-0.0121%22 Feb →
dust22–13-0.0218%22 Feb →
nuke13–110.0712%8 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0415%8 Feb →
dust213–60.0210%8 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0714%31 Jan →
nuke13–100.0321%31 Jan →
mirage9–130.0323%30 Jan →
inferno13–50.0120%30 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0121%30 Jan →
dust213–8-0.0122%24 Jan →
train13–80.0812%11 Jan →
ancient13–60.0113%10 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0213%9 Jan →
inferno3–8-0.0315%8 Jan →
ancient6–130.0323%5 Jan →
nuke13–30.0722%5 Jan →
inferno7–130.0912%16 Nov →
ancient13–90.0920%13 Nov →
ancient11–130.0714%12 Nov →
inferno9–40.1619%27 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0320%26 Oct →
inferno13–30.0511%12 Oct →
inferno5–130.0142%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.1515%6 Oct →
ancient9–130.0128%4 Oct →
overpass13–1-0.0238%4 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.075%3 Oct →
inferno8–130.1025%3 Oct →
transit9–40.189%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0218%3 Oct →
inferno11–20.1415%3 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0529%1 Sept →
ancient13–80.1217%29 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0310%17 Aug →
nuke13–50.1818%17 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0116%15 Aug →
dust24–130.0219%14 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0611%14 Aug →
anubis7–00.0563%11 Jun →
inferno4–130.0177%3 Jun →
nuke6–2-0.0733%1 Jun →
dust27–130.0047%29 May →
nuke13–30.0925%29 May →
anubis13–60.1017%24 May →
dust26–130.1060%22 May →
nuke13–10-0.0235%21 May →
nuke13–90.0316%20 May →
inferno9–130.0414%20 May →
mirage14–160.0126%19 May →
inferno13–70.0611%19 May →
nuke13–30.2623%29 Apr →
ancient5–130.0531%29 Apr →
mirage13–90.1312%28 Apr →
inferno13–80.1315%28 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.008%24 Mar →
dust213–80.0323%24 Mar →
nuke11–130.0514%24 Mar →
anubis1–90.1250%23 Mar →
dust20–13-0.0623%23 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0415%23 Mar →
mirage7–30.0218%23 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.