Jorgos

Jorgos — CS2 Stats

GR76561198175948363[U:1:215682635]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

844Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,020Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88569 of 230384 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Jul 2026 (77 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 22 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,020 -451 13 Jun5 Jul · 2 days played
19,02019,471peak 19,47113 Jun5 Jul
19,578Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,562Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-01-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,562
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 189 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 451 below peak (19,471)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 980 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJorgosPREMIER19,020 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,562csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning65
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −6.0pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.1
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.5
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time613ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–4 · office, 1 Feb
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 9 Jun
461msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 2 Feb
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 7 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 7anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C24101442%0.04
infernoC1871139%0.05
mirageC1881044%0.05
cacheS107370%0.08
anubisD72529%0.01
nukeS770100%0.07
ancientC73443%0.08
overpass42250%0.04
vertigo2020%-0.04
office21150%0.17
train110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

201Matches
57%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3863%1.2914.8
Dust21958%1.2917.0
Anubis1735%0.9014.8
Train1675%1.1317.1
Overpass1540%0.9815.4
Inferno1560%1.6719.0
Mirage1464%1.3314.3
Ancient1155%1.2518.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
614msReaction time
50.5%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
7.13HE damage / grenade
5.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4224 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.0223%7 Jul
dust26–13-0.0321%5 Jul
dust213–30.0719%5 Jul
nuke13–20.0331%5 Jul
inferno4–130.0418%3 Jul
cache13–50.0614%30 Jun
cache13–80.1228%30 Jun
cache13–40.0824%14 Jun
inferno5–130.0110%13 Jun
overpass13–8-0.019%13 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0212%13 Jun
dust213–60.0418%13 Jun
nuke13–90.1440%12 Jun
nuke13–110.0323%12 Jun
cache9–13-0.0424%12 Jun
ancient10–130.1026%11 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0117%9 Jun
cache13–30.0453%9 Jun
mirage13–40.0319%8 Jun
cache13–10.0925%8 Jun
cache13–80.1219%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0212%4 Jun
anubis8–130.0324%22 May
dust26–13-0.0220%22 May
ancient8–130.0113%18 May
mirage13–70.1410%18 May
cache8–130.0819%17 May
cache13–70.0918%17 May
dust28–130.0116%14 May
cache10–130.1319%14 May
overpass7–13-0.0411%14 May
anubis13–70.024%14 May
dust26–130.1018%13 May
nuke13–50.1119%9 May
anubis3–13-0.0912%9 May
dust216–140.0112%2 May
inferno5–130.0124%10 Apr
overpass8–130.0113%5 Apr
dust213–30.026%5 Apr
dust213–5-0.0126%5 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0521%3 Apr
inferno11–130.0523%29 Mar
mirage13–20.0517%27 Mar
mirage7–90.0224%21 Mar
mirage13–100.0718%21 Mar
vertigo7–13-0.0713%21 Mar
dust29–11-0.0323%10 Mar
dust211–130.0126%7 Mar
inferno2–130.0123%7 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0226%7 Mar
ancient13–100.1326%21 Feb
train13–110.1018%20 Feb
ancient7–20.0745%20 Feb
mirage13–80.1123%20 Feb
dust212–120.0719%20 Feb
inferno13–80.0941%20 Feb
mirage13–20.0521%20 Feb
dust29–130.0513%17 Feb
mirage7–130.1222%17 Feb
nuke13–100.0515%17 Feb
dust210–130.0823%16 Feb
inferno13–20.0430%16 Feb
ancient13–20.1521%16 Feb
inferno6–9-0.0241%16 Feb
dust213–110.1620%11 Feb
mirage13–50.0818%11 Feb
overpass13–40.2023%11 Feb
inferno13–90.1119%11 Feb
mirage6–130.0531%8 Feb
dust213–90.0423%8 Feb
mirage6–130.1128%8 Feb
anubis6–130.1129%8 Feb
anubis12–120.0515%7 Feb
dust213–70.1013%7 Feb
inferno13–00.0523%7 Feb
ancient9–130.089%7 Feb
vertigo1–7-0.0227%6 Feb
office8–130.0829%6 Feb
mirage4–130.0415%6 Feb
ancient3–130.0019%6 Feb
dust213–90.1022%2 Feb
mirage8–8-0.0020%2 Feb
dust213–100.0226%2 Feb
inferno9–40.1920%2 Feb
inferno3–9-0.1413%2 Feb
office13–40.2520%1 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0521%31 Jan
nuke13–80.0728%31 Jan
dust215–150.0220%31 Jan
dust210–130.0928%31 Jan
inferno7–90.1021%30 Jan
mirage12–120.1116%30 Jan
dust29–130.0321%30 Jan
mirage10–130.0320%29 Jan
inferno13–100.1518%29 Jan
inferno3–130.0120%27 Jan
inferno13–20.2431%23 Jan
dust212–160.0015%23 Jan
nuke13–20.0426%22 Jan
dust210–130.0214%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →