erkobossi

erkobossi — CS2 Stats

76561198450863774[U:1:490598046]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

756Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,883Light Blue band · top ~55.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 763 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,883 -5,117 18 Aug – 2 Nov · 29 days played
9,32615,412peak 15,41218 Aug2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 763 +0 10 Sept – 3 Oct · 3 observations
763763peak 76310 Sept3 Oct
15,921Peak Premier in tracked matches
763Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 763
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,529 below peak (15,412)
  • +557 over 30 days · improving
  • -5,117 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 117 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGerkobossiFACEITLevel 6 · 763 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER9,883 · Light Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO763csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning59
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35–63–2Last 10035%Win rateLWLWTWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility4.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning5.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics2.3
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time571ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 512ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 11–13 · dust2, 17 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 22 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 17 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–17In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3613–2336%-0.02
dust2D155–1033%-0.01
ancientC156–940%-0.00
nukeD132–1115%-0.03
cacheD124–833%-0.02
infernoA53–260%-0.01
anubis—42–250%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

250Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
77.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8456%1.1315.6
Nuke5260%0.9815.6
Anubis3244%1.0814.3
Ancient2854%1.0315.9
Dust21527%0.8113.0
Cache1354%0.8715.8
Inferno1118%0.6910.3
Overpass450%0.7412.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.8%Spray accuracy
60.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
571msReaction time
59.9%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
11.07HE damage / grenade
6.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4027% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.0334% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–130.0010%2 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0610%1 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.117%1 Nov →
cache13–50.0320%1 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0713%31 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0412%30 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0721%30 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0416%30 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.137%30 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0615%30 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.1023%30 Oct →
dust213–110.0917%18 Oct →
ancient13–110.1120%17 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0824%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0724%27 Sept →
ancient11–130.0122%20 Sept →
cache3–13-0.082%19 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0515%19 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0417%19 Sept →
mirage8–130.0420%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0515%18 Sept →
nuke13–60.0212%18 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.095%17 Sept →
dust211–130.1318%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0710%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0222%16 Sept →
ancient19–17-0.017%16 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0313%16 Sept →
mirage13–70.058%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0211%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0313%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0315%11 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0710%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.076%5 Sept →
ancient7–130.0316%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0211%4 Sept →
inferno13–90.0226%4 Sept →
nuke9–130.0415%3 Sept →
cache9–130.019%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.058%30 Aug →
cache11–13-0.019%30 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.1115%29 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.037%29 Aug →
cache11–130.0513%29 Aug →
mirage5–130.0110%29 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0218%29 Aug →
inferno13–80.044%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0010%28 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0121%28 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0323%28 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0514%28 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0213%28 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0312%28 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.057%28 Aug →
dust27–130.0322%27 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0116%27 Aug →
dust24–13-0.1113%27 Aug →
anubis13–160.018%26 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0425%26 Aug →
dust213–60.0213%26 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0614%26 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0311%26 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.028%26 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0216%25 Aug →
ancient13–40.049%25 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0410%25 Aug →
mirage13–90.0419%25 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.130%24 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.066%24 Aug →
anubis13–80.0414%24 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.1013%24 Aug →
mirage5–130.0117%24 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0518%23 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0315%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0218%23 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0215%23 Aug →
mirage13–40.0413%23 Aug →
mirage13–20.0532%22 Aug →
mirage13–160.0011%22 Aug →
mirage10–130.0514%21 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.029%21 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0616%21 Aug →
dust29–13-0.036%21 Aug →
ancient14–160.089%21 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0512%21 Aug →
mirage4–110.0529%20 Aug →
mirage13–60.0213%20 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0323%20 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0510%20 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0616%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0117%20 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0419%19 Aug →
mirage2–4-0.020%19 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.1014%19 Aug →
ancient13–110.0118%19 Aug →
cache13–11-0.1014%19 Aug →
ancient2–0-0.050%19 Aug →
ancient11–130.0611%18 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0213%18 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0311%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.