RamsesGreatiii TTV

RamsesGreatiii TTV — CS2 Stats

DK76561198172063127[U:1:211797399]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

520Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
731Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.1 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 13 May 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,892 -2,344 13 May8 Jan · 29 days played
9,45612,599peak 12,59913 May8 Jan
12,599Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2024-05-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,584), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate37.7%41.9%42.7%5.0% short
Shot accuracy15.1%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.900.980.990.09 short
Match win rate38.5%43.3%43.9%5.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRamsesGreatiii TTVFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning22
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37585Last 10037%Win rateWLLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 709ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 734ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility2.7
Positioning2.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 716ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning2.2
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time708ms+65ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 708ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 20 May
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 20 May
453msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 26 Oct
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 24 Oct

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 52% over 23infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23121152%-0.03
anubisB21101148%-0.02
ancientC1971237%-0.04
vertigoD124833%-0.04
infernoD112918%-0.04
trainD51420%-0.05
dust2D51420%-0.04
overpass2020%-0.03
mirage2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,425Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,298Matches
38.5%Match win rate
37.7%Headshot %
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,766MVPs
731Hours (in match)
1,149Bombs planted
253Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,446inferno
1,514nuke
1,132vertigo
639dust2
543train
71lake
65safehouse
47cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

81Matches
47%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
60.4ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
4%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1331%1.6612.6
Anubis1369%0.879.9
Vertigo1050%0.739.9
Inferno875%0.8912.4
Ancient333%0.578.0
Train250%0.4610.5
Overpass10%0.6210.0
Dust210%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
27.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.2%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
716msReaction time
15.1%T opening success
14.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
10.62HE damage / grenade
10.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7862% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 716.0265ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.1424% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–12-0.0523%30 May
overpass11–13-0.0513%26 Oct
ancient3–13-0.068%26 Oct
overpass8–13-0.0121%9 Aug
train9–13-0.0415%9 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0416%26 Jun
train15–19-0.0318%20 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0310%20 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0213%18 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0611%18 Jun
ancient13–9-0.078%30 May
anubis13–50.0218%30 May
inferno10–13-0.027%30 May
train13–10-0.1210%24 May
anubis13–60.039%24 May
ancient7–13-0.0516%24 May
ancient15–15-0.0514%20 May
nuke13–30.0828%20 May
dust29–13-0.0524%20 May
train13–16-0.0313%14 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0118%14 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0610%11 Mar
nuke9–13-0.1116%28 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0322%1 Feb
ancient12–16-0.0517%1 Feb
anubis12–16-0.0514%1 Feb
mirage7–13-0.067%8 Jan
vertigo4–13-0.0220%8 Jan
anubis13–5-0.0214%5 Jan
vertigo13–3-0.0111%5 Jan
vertigo7–13-0.0517%5 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0810%4 Jan
nuke13–9-0.0519%4 Jan
nuke13–9-0.053%12 Dec
mirage8–13-0.012%12 Dec
train9–13-0.0313%1 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0516%1 Dec
vertigo7–13-0.028%1 Dec
nuke4–13-0.073%27 Oct
anubis10–13-0.0118%27 Oct
ancient9–13-0.017%24 Oct
vertigo13–2-0.0525%24 Oct
anubis15–15-0.0114%4 Oct
ancient11–13-0.0626%27 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0210%27 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0514%21 Sept
ancient13–50.0418%21 Sept
nuke13–100.0115%10 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0314%7 Sept
anubis6–13-0.035%6 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0619%6 Sept
anubis13–90.0213%3 Sept
anubis13–30.0425%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.078%30 Aug
inferno5–13-0.106%30 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0511%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0016%30 Aug
inferno14–16-0.016%22 Aug
inferno11–130.007%22 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0819%22 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0218%17 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0421%17 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0211%17 Aug
anubis6–130.0121%11 Aug
dust212–12-0.0210%11 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1424%11 Aug
nuke16–13-0.029%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0212%10 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0918%21 Jul
dust22–13-0.0511%21 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.1010%16 Jul
ancient13–11-0.049%3 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0414%18 Jun
nuke10–13-0.026%18 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0211%17 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.1012%17 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0514%17 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0227%17 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0413%6 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0213%6 Jun
dust27–13-0.0617%6 Jun
nuke13–30.076%5 Jun
inferno2–13-0.1019%5 Jun
dust216–13-0.0222%3 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0121%2 Jun
anubis13–80.0217%2 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0320%2 Jun
ancient13–10-0.015%27 May
ancient15–15-0.052%27 May
nuke2–13-0.0727%27 May
inferno11–13-0.0019%27 May
vertigo16–14-0.0211%24 May
nuke13–4-0.0019%24 May
anubis7–13-0.067%24 May
vertigo13–5-0.0611%24 May
anubis13–100.0110%16 May
vertigo7–13-0.0218%16 May
nuke13–11-0.078%14 May
vertigo11–13-0.0611%14 May
ancient6–13-0.0413%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →