tpf.

tpf. — CS2 Stats

DE76561198171409410[U:1:211143682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

617Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,801Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,232 -27 25 Feb – 1 Apr · 7 days played
17,46519,868peak 19,86825 Feb1 Apr
19,991Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,351Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2024-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,351
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtpf.PEAK ELO1,351csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning61
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility4.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning6.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time645ms+37ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 24 Jul →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 1 Apr →
328msFastest reaction time · 7–2 · inferno, 13 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 47% over 30anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3014–1647%-0.01
ancientB2210–1245%-0.01
dust2B199–1047%-0.03
anubisC166–1038%-0.01
train—42–250%-0.02
overpass—32–167%-0.00
mirage—31–233%0.01
cache—21–150%-0.03
nuke—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,598Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
3,418Matches
43.6%Match win rate
52.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
6,755MVPs
1,801Hours (in match)
2,898Bombs planted
834Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,349
AWP4,441
P2502,103
FAMAS1,961
P901,499

Lifetime map wins

11,916inferno
8,317dust2
1,948cbble
567vertigo
439train
381nuke
65office
43lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

903Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
69.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1963%0.9615.2
Inferno1968%1.0714.8
Anubis1741%0.8414.0
Dust2933%0.8712.9
Overpass250%0.779.5
Cache2100%1.1615.0
Nuke2100%1.4214.0
Vertigo1100%1.1714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
651msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
11.24HE damage / grenade
7.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.207% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.0121%23 Jul →
inferno9–130.0419%5 May →
cache13–9-0.0028%5 May →
dust25–130.0314%5 May →
cache7–13-0.0619%5 May →
inferno13–110.0217%27 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0716%27 Apr →
inferno13–160.0115%27 Apr →
anubis6–13-0.1010%15 Jan →
inferno1–13-0.1142%9 Jan →
ancient11–130.0232%9 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0417%9 Jan →
inferno13–2-0.0136%28 Oct →
train2–13-0.0617%28 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0134%28 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0119%28 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.079%24 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0121%21 Oct →
inferno13–90.0426%21 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0118%4 Aug →
overpass13–5-0.0322%4 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0721%31 Jul →
train13–100.0026%31 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.0015%31 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0136%31 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0120%31 Jul →
overpass8–60.0233%24 Jul →
inferno13–2-0.0323%24 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0232%24 Jul →
nuke13–40.0913%24 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0224%24 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0115%24 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0727%1 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0617%1 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0254%1 Apr →
ancient4–130.0317%31 Mar →
dust210–130.0334%31 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0511%31 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0529%28 Mar →
ancient13–110.0525%28 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0217%28 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0527%27 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0626%27 Mar →
ancient13–70.0222%20 Mar →
mirage3–130.0521%11 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0329%11 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0038%11 Mar →
inferno10–130.0023%6 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0212%6 Mar →
train13–30.0212%6 Mar →
anubis13–4-0.0312%6 Mar →
inferno3–130.0025%27 Feb →
inferno13–90.0423%27 Feb →
ancient8–40.0033%25 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0033%25 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0123%25 Feb →
dust213–80.0023%25 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0429%19 Feb →
ancient16–14-0.0414%19 Feb →
dust213–3-0.0017%19 Feb →
anubis13–70.0323%19 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0429%18 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0618%18 Feb →
dust211–130.0120%18 Feb →
anubis15–15-0.0119%17 Feb →
mirage16–140.0428%16 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0213%16 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0129%13 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.0510%13 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0322%13 Feb →
anubis13–50.0617%13 Feb →
inferno12–120.0221%6 Feb →
anubis12–120.0329%6 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0217%6 Feb →
dust213–9-0.047%6 Feb →
inferno8–130.0121%6 Feb →
inferno13–100.0132%28 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0024%28 Jan →
anubis13–8-0.0123%28 Jan →
dust212–12-0.0429%28 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0530%28 Jan →
anubis4–13-0.0245%28 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.0413%21 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.0220%21 Nov →
dust24–13-0.1021%21 Nov →
ancient8–130.0115%21 Nov →
train10–13-0.0526%21 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0745%19 Nov →
anubis12–16-0.0713%19 Nov →
inferno13–60.0640%19 Nov →
anubis10–130.0118%19 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0122%19 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0524%21 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0213%15 Aug →
inferno7–2-0.030%13 Aug →
dust212–120.0126%13 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0219%13 Aug →
dust213–60.0338%13 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0424%12 Aug →
anubis13–90.0619%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.