akumu

akumu — CS2 Stats

SM76561198171217411[U:1:210951683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,617Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,428Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26200 of 233471 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 18 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,428 -2,602 18 May14 Sept · 21 days played
24,39127,030peak 27,03018 May14 Sept
27,278Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-05-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,602 below peak (27,030)
  • -13 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,077 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 572 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGakumuFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,428 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning56
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility4.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time507ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 2 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–2 · mirage, 13 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · mirage, 13 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
512In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 17infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2581732%-0.00
dust2C1881044%-0.01
anubisS1712571%0.01
ancientA1710759%-0.01
infernoD82625%-0.02
cacheC73443%-0.00
nukeS64267%0.01
office1010%-0.02
train1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,346Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
80.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11449%0.9914.9
Ancient7454%1.0015.4
Anubis5749%0.9914.5
Vertigo4149%0.9213.9
Inferno4161%1.1417.9
Overpass3474%1.1616.1
Nuke2646%0.9416.6
Dust22045%0.9615.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
504msReaction time
48.9%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.433 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0320%14 Sept
dust26–130.0028%14 Sept
mirage6–130.0237%14 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0031%10 Sept
cache13–90.0831%10 Sept
dust215–15-0.0319%10 Sept
nuke13–30.1028%8 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0213%8 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0138%8 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0316%8 Sept
dust22–130.0128%24 Aug
mirage13–30.0426%24 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0329%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0324%19 Aug
mirage7–130.0622%19 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0413%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0317%16 Aug
mirage0–6-0.1227%16 Aug
anubis13–80.0220%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0333%14 Aug
ancient13–40.0019%14 Aug
mirage5–130.0224%14 Aug
mirage6–20.0350%13 Aug
office3–13-0.0237%13 Aug
train5–13-0.0630%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0517%13 Aug
cache3–13-0.0414%13 Aug
anubis13–70.0210%13 Aug
dust210–130.0223%13 Aug
dust29–0-0.0818%11 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0414%11 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0616%9 Aug
dust213–70.0515%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.039%7 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0336%7 Aug
mirage1–30.0350%7 Aug
mirage4–3-0.0320%6 Aug
dust213–60.0516%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0321%6 Aug
nuke16–120.0325%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0331%5 Aug
dust213–6-0.0113%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0114%5 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0013%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.0441%5 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0823%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0729%3 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0519%3 Aug
mirage5–1-0.0220%3 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0315%3 Aug
mirage7–10.035%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0726%2 Aug
ancient13–30.1410%2 Aug
dust213–20.0134%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0811%2 Aug
dust213–70.0822%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0411%2 Aug
anubis13–70.0216%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0523%2 Aug
anubis13–10.0613%2 Aug
cache13–60.0420%1 Aug
ancient13–00.0320%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0224%1 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0412%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0019%1 Aug
anubis13–110.0016%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0218%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0512%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0018%30 Jul
mirage15–150.0019%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0820%30 Jul
anubis13–110.0117%29 Jul
dust213–60.0913%29 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0023%29 Jul
anubis13–40.0211%29 Jul
mirage3–20.0214%19 Jul
mirage13–30.1314%19 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0225%17 Jul
anubis13–50.0212%16 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0127%8 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0020%8 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0232%8 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0114%6 Jul
dust23–20.0410%6 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0120%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0520%3 Jul
dust21–13-0.0711%3 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0930%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0018%23 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0121%23 Jun
ancient14–160.0014%25 May
mirage12–160.0325%24 May
mirage0–10-0.0713%18 May
dust213–5-0.0229%18 May
ancient13–100.0317%18 May
cache12–12-0.0216%18 May
cache13–70.0225%18 May
mirage4–13-0.0728%18 May
inferno6–13-0.0421%18 May
dust20–13-0.0814%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →