♛FloZzeN™

♛FloZzeN™ — CS2 Stats

76561198170537355[U:1:210271627]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,550Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,838Top 50% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69133 of 251191 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,230 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,838 +317 5 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 days played
20,52120,838peak 20,8385 Sept23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,230 +0 28 Aug – 11 Sept · 3 observations
2,2302,230peak 2,23028 Aug11 Sept
20,838Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,230Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,230
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 270 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,838
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,162 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♛FloZzeN™FACEITLevel 9 · 2,230 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,838 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,230csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning59
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–48Last 10052%Win rateLLLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility3.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.9
Utility3.3
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time509ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 22 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 1 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 20 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
16–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB199–1047%0.00
dust2C166–1038%-0.01
mirageS1510–567%-0.02
anubisB147–750%0.02
ancientB137–654%0.01
nukeA116–555%0.02
cacheA106–460%0.02
vertigo—21–150%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,040Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient97449%1.0115.0
Mirage89148%0.9914.8
Anubis85850%1.0715.5
Dust278348%0.9914.8
Inferno54749%1.0214.9
Nuke48052%1.0615.1
Overpass16851%1.0115.3
Train13545%0.9714.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
66.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
509msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
6.38HE damage / grenade
5.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4512% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3921 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2282% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0413%3 Oct →
nuke6–130.0516%2 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0127%2 Oct →
dust25–130.0426%2 Oct →
dust27–130.0123%1 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0111%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.016%29 Sept →
inferno8–130.0410%29 Sept →
cache2–130.0318%28 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.016%26 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.019%26 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0228%26 Sept →
dust213–50.0326%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0817%26 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.016%26 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.050%25 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0523%25 Sept →
ancient13–60.037%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0213%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.0113%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.029%23 Sept →
inferno13–20.1622%22 Sept →
nuke13–40.015%22 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0418%22 Sept →
ancient13–70.0423%19 Sept →
cache10–13-0.039%19 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.059%18 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.089%7 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0414%6 Sept →
cache13–60.1224%6 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0311%6 Sept →
dust24–4-0.0717%5 Sept →
inferno13–90.0115%4 Sept →
mirage13–100.0018%4 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0315%3 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0825%3 Sept →
vertigo7–90.0928%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0016%1 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.039%1 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0216%25 Aug →
ancient13–30.0414%25 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0516%25 Aug →
anubis13–110.0523%24 Aug →
anubis13–100.0312%24 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0015%23 Aug →
cache16–140.0519%23 Aug →
dust213–70.0115%23 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0415%23 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0514%23 Aug →
anubis13–160.0217%23 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0318%22 Aug →
cache16–190.0017%21 Aug →
dust28–13-0.068%20 Aug →
ancient16–140.0110%19 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.039%18 Aug →
ancient5–130.0416%18 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0124%18 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.1122%17 Aug →
mirage13–50.0720%17 Aug →
anubis13–30.0420%17 Aug →
dust27–130.0126%17 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0315%16 Aug →
dust213–50.0718%14 Aug →
nuke9–130.0716%13 Aug →
ancient13–80.0524%13 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0112%13 Aug →
anubis13–70.0419%13 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0415%12 Aug →
cache13–50.0715%12 Aug →
anubis4–120.0731%11 Aug →
anubis13–110.0510%11 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0419%10 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0424%8 Aug →
vertigo9–70.1313%8 Aug →
nuke13–50.0410%8 Aug →
cache13–70.0912%7 Aug →
inferno13–110.0713%7 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0223%7 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0116%6 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0313%6 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.074%5 Aug →
dust210–130.0231%4 Aug →
nuke7–130.0212%3 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0013%3 Aug →
ancient11–130.0014%2 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0023%2 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.033%2 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0315%1 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0332%1 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0319%1 Aug →
dust24–130.0320%1 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0311%31 Jul →
nuke9–130.047%28 Jul →
ancient13–30.0613%28 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0124%28 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0412%28 Jul →
inferno5–130.0123%26 Jul →
anubis16–120.0711%26 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0218%26 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0114%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.