calz

calz — CS2 Stats

76561198169821777[U:1:209556049]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,270Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,766Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,543Top 50% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75560 of 258683 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,711 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (55 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,543 → 20,543
0Faceit ELO · 1,711 → 1,711
+77Tracked matches · now 1,270
−6.9ppWin rate · 48.3% → 41.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,543 +1,893 28 Mar – 5 Sept · 23 days played
18,65021,094peak 21,09428 Mar5 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,711 +0 30 Aug – 5 Sept · 2 observations
1,7111,711peak 1,71130 Aug5 Sept
21,094Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,711Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
67Days played since 2026-02-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,711
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 40 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 551 below peak (21,094)
  • -551 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,457 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.3%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy14.0%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.071.090.06 short
Match win rate45.6%46.9%48.4%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcalzFACEITLevel 9 · 1,711 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,543 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,711csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time567ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · vertigo, 4 Jun →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 3–6 · mirage, 26 Jun →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 24 May →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 27 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 38anubisWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3819–1950%-0.01
anubisC219–1243%-0.02
ancientB199–1047%-0.01
infernoB126–650%-0.01
cache—43–175%0.00
overpass—21–150%0.01
dust2—22–0100%-0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.12
nuke—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,683Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
3,475Matches
45.6%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
9,406MVPs
1,766Hours (in match)
2,118Bombs planted
999Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,687
AWP11,749
FAMAS1,371
P2501,366
Tec-91,305

Lifetime map wins

3,442inferno
2,396dust2
948cbble
683nuke
637vertigo
612train
268aztec
162dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

898Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28150%0.9916.0
Ancient18951%1.0315.0
Anubis17153%0.9915.8
Inferno8340%0.9314.5
Vertigo1953%0.9516.7
Cache1275%1.0816.8
Dust21040%0.9215.4
Overpass650%1.0815.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
555msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
7.43HE damage / grenade
11.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8601% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0426%29 Oct →
inferno14–160.0121%22 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0219%22 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0313%19 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0117%18 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0838%17 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0716%17 Oct →
ancient13–100.039%13 Oct →
mirage16–19-0.0218%11 Oct →
ancient9–130.0131%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0312%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.045%7 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0527%26 Jul →
anubis13–90.0318%23 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0013%22 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0354%21 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0820%6 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0411%4 Jul →
ancient10–130.0118%3 Jul →
mirage13–40.0530%30 Jun →
anubis15–150.0518%29 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0135%27 Jun →
mirage3–6-0.0357%26 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.066%24 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0414%18 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.043%17 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0611%12 Jun →
mirage13–100.0820%11 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0023%11 Jun →
anubis12–16-0.0320%8 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0427%5 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0011%4 Jun →
vertigo13–70.1221%4 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0528%2 Jun →
ancient13–80.0425%1 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0313%26 May →
ancient13–5-0.0135%25 May →
mirage13–11-0.0414%25 May →
anubis10–13-0.0216%25 May →
mirage13–8-0.0234%24 May →
anubis19–160.0114%22 May →
ancient4–13-0.0616%21 May →
anubis13–110.0020%19 May →
inferno13–50.0826%19 May →
mirage6–13-0.0918%17 May →
ancient8–13-0.0415%16 May →
anubis14–16-0.0122%15 May →
mirage13–8-0.0415%14 May →
anubis9–130.0013%12 May →
anubis16–130.0515%10 May →
mirage22–19-0.0419%10 May →
nuke2–13-0.0326%10 May →
mirage6–13-0.0727%10 May →
cache10–130.0216%9 May →
cache13–50.0013%9 May →
anubis11–13-0.049%9 May →
mirage12–16-0.0612%9 May →
mirage11–130.0520%8 May →
anubis13–8-0.047%8 May →
cache13–9-0.0215%8 May →
inferno4–13-0.0915%7 May →
anubis13–70.0730%7 May →
ancient13–6-0.068%6 May →
mirage13–80.0635%6 May →
mirage13–100.0319%4 May →
inferno13–8-0.038%3 May →
mirage13–11-0.0613%2 May →
cache13–40.0217%29 Apr →
mirage13–40.0422%29 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0022%28 Apr →
mirage13–60.0710%27 Apr →
overpass13–90.0723%25 Apr →
anubis16–12-0.0116%23 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0215%22 Apr →
mirage0–13-0.0436%21 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0529%21 Apr →
mirage7–10.0140%21 Apr →
ancient8–130.0126%21 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0026%21 Apr →
ancient7–130.0626%21 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0526%20 Apr →
mirage13–80.0241%18 Apr →
overpass0–4-0.0517%18 Apr →
inferno13–40.0621%18 Apr →
inferno13–50.0223%17 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0827%13 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0819%13 Apr →
inferno13–70.0226%10 Apr →
mirage11–130.0132%29 Mar →
mirage7–1-0.0450%29 Mar →
ancient13–110.0523%29 Mar →
mirage8–130.0212%28 Mar →
mirage13–100.0223%28 Mar →
dust213–4-0.088%24 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0119%24 Mar →
mirage5–130.0232%23 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0217%23 Mar →
ancient13–60.0417%23 Mar →
anubis13–6-0.0820%26 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0513%26 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.