UuniMamma

UuniMamma — CS2 Stats

FI76561198169631477[U:1:209365749]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,619Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,408Purple band · top ~26.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 980 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,408 +2,796 22 Sept – 18 Oct · 18 days played
12,61215,408peak 15,40822 Sept18 Oct
16,013Peak Premier in tracked matches
980Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 980
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 71 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 15,408
  • +2,796 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,592 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUuniMammaFACEITLevel 4 · 980 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,408 · Purple bandPEAK ELO980csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning60
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 696ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 674ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time619ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 12 Sept →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 18 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 16 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
11–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2010–1050%-0.01
infernoB199–1047%-0.03
nukeS1813–572%0.02
ancientB147–750%-0.03
anubisC104–640%-0.02
mirageC94–544%-0.01
cacheA95–456%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,119Matches
50%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
68.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27049%0.8713.5
Dust221147%0.9214.1
Ancient14755%0.7712.3
Nuke13854%0.8914.2
Anubis13248%0.8713.7
Inferno8449%0.7912.5
Vertigo729%0.8715.9
Cache683%0.8815.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
613msReaction time
51.3%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
4.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.9777% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0418%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.0416%18 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0125%18 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0322%18 Oct →
nuke13–10.0464%18 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.1419%17 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0314%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.0224%17 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0123%17 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0113%17 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0336%17 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0214%17 Oct →
nuke4–130.0224%17 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0322%16 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0121%16 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0026%16 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0330%16 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0013%16 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0326%16 Oct →
inferno7–130.0235%16 Oct →
cache8–130.0322%15 Oct →
nuke13–90.0529%15 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.018%15 Oct →
dust213–60.0224%15 Oct →
mirage11–130.0228%15 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0311%15 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0621%15 Oct →
inferno13–110.0316%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0111%14 Oct →
nuke13–20.0435%14 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0628%14 Oct →
dust213–10.1120%14 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0116%14 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0326%13 Oct →
mirage13–110.0332%13 Oct →
dust216–120.0125%11 Oct →
ancient13–70.0023%11 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0229%11 Oct →
inferno5–130.0023%11 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0029%3 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0417%3 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0126%3 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0523%3 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0129%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0824%2 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0426%2 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0417%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0516%2 Oct →
inferno13–40.0815%1 Oct →
anubis2–12-0.0125%1 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0220%1 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0125%1 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0814%1 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0925%1 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0216%30 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0322%30 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0322%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0228%30 Sept →
mirage13–50.079%30 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0319%29 Sept →
anubis13–50.0416%29 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0730%28 Sept →
nuke13–00.1334%28 Sept →
ancient13–110.0022%28 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0826%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0920%27 Sept →
nuke13–10.0333%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0219%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0510%26 Sept →
dust210–130.0415%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0436%23 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0720%23 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0422%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0613%22 Sept →
dust26–13-0.069%21 Sept →
train1–13-0.100%21 Sept →
dust29–130.0020%15 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0250%12 Sept →
nuke9–00.3429%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0114%5 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1917%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0527%3 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0319%3 Sept →
cache6–13-0.067%3 Sept →
dust29–130.0319%29 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0626%29 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0130%27 Aug →
dust213–50.0117%27 Aug →
nuke13–90.0125%25 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0610%25 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0232%25 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0314%20 Aug →
anubis19–16-0.0515%15 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0624%15 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0616%14 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0231%14 Aug →
nuke13–90.0217%14 Aug →
cache16–140.0314%12 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0911%11 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0743%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.